Fallout Series
- Thread starter myzko
- Start date
![[-project.rattus-]](/data/avatars/s/0/161.jpg?1568638684){kind=avatar}
lso due to teh s
I guess that's also due to Fallouts setting. A post-apocalyptical world just doesn't have much room for cheerful people...
But I personally was really looking forward to Oblivion, only to find out how shallow that game is after the graphics-and-physics-euphoria was over (after about two hours)... So I am treating Bethesda basically like a small spoiled brat who just found out that Santa is only his Dad in a cheap costume.
Also, that's a way to cheat myself: instead of having high hopes, I have none. This way, in the worst case my expectations are met and I am not in for a frustrating experience, and in any other case, I am pleasantly surprised. I'll end up buying it anyways, unless the forum consensus here is that it sucks balls, but I definitely won't feel so cheated if it actually isn't like Fallout at all.
I mean, it's not like Oblivion is a bad game. It really isn't, it's just that it didn't meet my expectations (which, tbh were mostly generated by Bethesda PR) I had in both the game and the series. I would have very much enjoyed it if it just wasn't branded as Elder Scrolls...
I guess that's also the problem I have with the R6 series: I'm always in for mindless shooting, but not if the name suggests something else. It was like buying chocolate and finding out that it actually is just bacon. Not that bacon is bad, but, well, you know, you just bought chocolate for a reason: you wanted chocolate and not bacon.
The only merit R6 Vegas has to me is that it makes the GRAW series actually look like a decent tactical fps...
well, where were we now? ^^
No problem mate
But in my opinion, people shouldn't bash a game when it's not even released. After release you can bash it if is crappy. That's my main gripe about diehard Fallout fans. They are so pessimistic.
I guess that's also due to Fallouts setting. A post-apocalyptical world just doesn't have much room for cheerful people...
But I personally was really looking forward to Oblivion, only to find out how shallow that game is after the graphics-and-physics-euphoria was over (after about two hours)... So I am treating Bethesda basically like a small spoiled brat who just found out that Santa is only his Dad in a cheap costume.
Also, that's a way to cheat myself: instead of having high hopes, I have none. This way, in the worst case my expectations are met and I am not in for a frustrating experience, and in any other case, I am pleasantly surprised. I'll end up buying it anyways, unless the forum consensus here is that it sucks balls, but I definitely won't feel so cheated if it actually isn't like Fallout at all.
I mean, it's not like Oblivion is a bad game. It really isn't, it's just that it didn't meet my expectations (which, tbh were mostly generated by Bethesda PR) I had in both the game and the series. I would have very much enjoyed it if it just wasn't branded as Elder Scrolls...
I guess that's also the problem I have with the R6 series: I'm always in for mindless shooting, but not if the name suggests something else. It was like buying chocolate and finding out that it actually is just bacon. Not that bacon is bad, but, well, you know, you just bought chocolate for a reason: you wanted chocolate and not bacon.
The only merit R6 Vegas has to me is that it makes the GRAW series actually look like a decent tactical fps...
well, where were we now? ^^
You can have no hopes without constantly spilling trite bull**** about how the game will suck when it's released years from now. And FFS quit it with ****ing vegas, ugh, it's like a broken record that no one wants to listen to. Listen to yourself, *****ing about a game you admit is not a bad, but the ****ing NAME just ruined it for you. Madness!
Methinks you should read his post again, for you have obviously not understood it...
