Are you going to increase the weapon sway? Make bracing your weapon on surfaces actually worth it!
Last edited:
Dear TWI, PLEASE ANSWER US THIS
- Thread starter ArchoN2010
- Start date
I really, really hope they don't. It would be pretty stupid if they did.
It would make sense contextually if you sprint and get out of breath you are going to have a harder time steadying your aim than if you are completely fresh.
From a rested soldier the aiming is fine but sprinting doesn't seem to do anything not to mention we can infinitely hold our breath it would seem.
Good one. Be gone you troll, and next time make it less obvious.
I agree with shot, or tired until you are a bit rested up. Otherwise, the sway is as real as it gets, in reality even when you enter ironsights you don't sway like a bull on speeds, you have a gentle sway, and if you hold your breath you can stay pretty much motionless for 5-10 seconds at least.
Remember something, weapons are Made to be accurate, and sway as little as possible. They were made like that back then, and are made like that now. The sway system, on normal conditions (when tired, there should be a bit more sway, I agree there) is perfectly fine as it is.
EDIT: ArchoN2010, not trolling, I really hope they don't.
Contrary to popular belief, there is actually weapon sway in RO2. Play on different servers if you're not getting it. There are also supersonic bullet cracks (vewy vewy quiet ones), and suppression 'jerks' much like those in Darkest Hour, but less pronounced.
The more you know.
The more you know.
So anyone who doesn't agree with you is a troll?
I'd like to see sway increased after running / out of breath. I think the present sway when 'fresh' is fine, i find resting my weapon does help personally. Obviously it only matters for long range shots, but that is how it should be.
Yip...a gentle sway especially after being shot, sprints and ladders etc. is needed so much! As well as a realistic recoil.
The amount of automatic weapons itself is ridiculous. I feel like a stormtrooper in Battlefront...but being shot with a ppsh (on auto) from 50m+ is so ****** weird and annoying.
I think sway and recoil would solve the prob with the horde of automatic-stromtroopers...i remember well the days when in RO1 I knew that a mp40 or ppsh would have been a tough choice on certain maps because of the middle to long distances.
Now it is terrible to play...nothing against a nice variety of weapons...but such an inflation of (semi)autos that are deadly even on long distances is kiddystyle-fps
my 2 cents
The amount of automatic weapons itself is ridiculous. I feel like a stormtrooper in Battlefront...but being shot with a ppsh (on auto) from 50m+ is so ****** weird and annoying.
I think sway and recoil would solve the prob with the horde of automatic-stromtroopers...i remember well the days when in RO1 I knew that a mp40 or ppsh would have been a tough choice on certain maps because of the middle to long distances.
Now it is terrible to play...nothing against a nice variety of weapons...but such an inflation of (semi)autos that are deadly even on long distances is kiddystyle-fps
my 2 cents
Last edited:
Define "Realistic Recoil".
Having fired weapons similar to those found in game, and even far larger weapons, I really don't see a problem with the recoil as far as realism goes.
What is a problem is how quickly you can line up your sights for long range shots. Close range it shouldn't matter. I can about face and put a round through centre mass at 25-50m without much effort. However shooting at long range would take me a few more seconds to settle down and aim properly. If you're standing 5 feet in front of me, I'm not missing.
What the weapons need is 'weight'. They should be effected by physical inertia, and control inertia. (That is, the mass of the weapon forcing it to continue in a given direction, and your control not quite being exact. You're not a robot who can stop at exactly 43.33333 degrees, you'll likely over shoot, correct, still be off slightly, correct again, etc.)
No, that wouldn't be "fun." In CoD, you don't have weapon sway, and that's the most "fun" game ever. And since can't have too much of a good thing, we should have as much CoDness on the market as possible!
CoD is "fun" and it has sold millions upon millions of copies. Let's make RO2 like CoD so we can sell millions upon millions of copies, nobody gives a **** about the customers anyway, just give us your moneyz.
Yeah, the people that like this outnumber us 1000 to 1! They'd all be on the forums to say so, except it's too technically sophisticated for them, but, they're the Silent Majority, rest assured!
Yeah...i think this is exactly what i meant
Ah, none of what I posted had anything to do with recoil, but was merely stuff that happens while you are lining up a shot,...
+1
Disregard haters, TWI. Sway is fine as-is. Please don't degrade long-range combat with unrealistic sway. As it stands, you have good rifle duels at 150m+, and that's exactly how it should be. Sway just takes away from the riflemen even more than the hordes of automatic weapons and tiny maps do. This would be the final nail in the coffin.
+1
If you're constantly getting shot by riflemen you never saw, perhaps you should consider not being seen. I use it all the time to great success, and I capture objectives and get plenty of kills while doing so. Just use cover and concealment to avoid getting shot. You know, like real soldiers do.
Or, because, you know, they're too busy playing the game.
I don't know about you, but I don't visit developer forums that often. Shoot, the only reason I joined this one was to report some bugs when the beta started. Then I saw all the whiners trying to get the game mechanics changed, and here I am 900 posts later one of the few people arguing for the status quo. The fact of the matter is that everyone else is too busy having fun to come to the forums and complain about nothing.
Last edited: