Cpt-Praxius's Updated Review of RO2:

  • Please make sure you are familiar with the forum rules. You can find them here: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/index.php?threads/forum-rules.2334636/

DiedTrying

FNG / Fresh Meat
Jan 17, 2011
1,433
843
0
USA Prime Credit
I must have some bias where I find long winded posts to be an attempt at killing an opposing opinion through repetition and long thoughts (I can't remember what this is called exactly, I think it's labeled under a logical fallacy)

but I think in Prax's case, it's just his personality and not due to him having an agenda.
 

r5cya

FNG / Fresh Meat
Jan 17, 2011
6,047
445
0
San Bruno, California
i'd love to see some armored personnel carriers. problem is, i don't think there's really room for them. commissar is about the only map with enough room. well, i guess the tank map would work as well. it would really be nice if that one had some caps for infantry to get into and some vehicles to get them there. i can't really see a carrier working good at all on apartments, barracks and least of all, grain elevator. not at the tiny size they are now. the maps are really set up for run and gun. i love this game but am not all that pleased that the maps force us into arcade style gaming.

as far as gameplay and bugs go, yeah. i'd like to see that fixed first. there's still just too many little things that get in the way of the fun. that list is best stated on another thread to avoid getting off track on this one.
 

Cpt-Praxius

FNG / Fresh Meat
Dec 12, 2005
3,300
1,667
0
Canadian in Australia
..... In summary, I really have no interest in "conversing" with prax's yappy lap dog as it's obviously a lost cause.

Then here's a brilliant idea that even you should be able to figure out..... if you have no interest in actually responding to any threads or topics I decide to create.... maybe you should avoid posting in my threads or responding to my posts.... maybe you should stop hi-jacking threads others might have some interest in and unloading more of your pointless trolling and b*tching.

You complain about others actually agreeing with me, you continue to finger point at others who decide to try and contribute to a topic..... you then trash on anybody who seems to kiss my arse when all they're doing is trying to have a some-what mature conversation & point out how they somehow follow me everywhere I go in the forums.....

.... yet it seems to be you who is the one following me around in here. I've never even seen you post anything constructive or useful in any thread.... all you do is hi-jack threads to further b*tch about things you don't like and to fling poop at myself and everyone else who you don't agree with.

You haven't even directed any response to the original post or the topic for that matter...... thus troll

You have no interest?

Good.... go piss off somewhere else then, cuz nobody has any interest in you and your self-righteous, self-entitled emo crap.

Nobody gives a sh*t what you care about anymore, I don't, nobody else in here does and by your own words, apparently the Devs don't either..... so why don't you just take your precious drama queen troll bullsh*t off to Call of Duty where you and your kind belong.

You're not helping anything, you're not contributing towards anything, you don't even have an opinion on the game anymore..... you're just stuck constantly targeting community members, trashing them at any chance you get and side-tracking thread topic after thread topic.

We get it..... you're a troll who has nothing better to do than to go into the forums of a game you don't like to insult & flame all the members and troll-hard about how much you don't like the game and how nobody listens to you.

Gee, I wonder why nobody listens to you anymore. :rolleyes:

What a spectacular waste of time you are...... and I bet you didn't even read any of this because it's more than two sentences long and too complicated for you to keep all in your head at once.

Been over this before; I've posted many things to help posters on here and I've made many suggestions. I've also asked in the past, for you to point out where I trashed the game or called people stupid for liking it. For some reason you always skip that bit.

You don't know how I feel about the game and you can't find any posts to prove your cockamamie hypothesis. On that note, thanks for providing more evidence of your inflated ego ie..."I help the forum, I make suggestions that make the game more fun" :rolleyes:

Speaking of quoting.... why should I even bother to futher prove you wrong, when you can't even prove me wrong with quotes from this very thread?

"I help the forum, I make suggestions that make the game more fun"

Really? I said that?

Funny, I could have sworn I said "At least some of us are trying to suggest ways of improving the game and making it more fun...."

Never said I help the forum without question or that my suggestions make the game more fun.

But keep cherry picking what you think I said and skewing quotes that aren't even quotes to try and further your pointless crusade against us evil'doers. :rolleyes:

You couldn't fail more if you tried.

..... I still find it mildly amusing that where ever I find Prax I find you.

And yet, where ever I am, you seem to be there too...... what does that tell you about yourself?

Uh-oh..... too many quotes in one post and too many words, here comes more of DT's complaints of having to read too much. If this is all too much for you to read and to grasp that you mis quote even more, perhaps you'd do better following Twitter.
 
Last edited:

Cpt-Praxius

FNG / Fresh Meat
Dec 12, 2005
3,300
1,667
0
Canadian in Australia
i'd love to see some armored personnel carriers. problem is, i don't think there's really room for them. commissar is about the only map with enough room. well, i guess the tank map would work as well. it would really be nice if that one had some caps for infantry to get into and some vehicles to get them there. i can't really see a carrier working good at all on apartments, barracks and least of all, grain elevator. not at the tiny size they are now. the maps are really set up for run and gun. i love this game but am not all that pleased that the maps force us into arcade style gaming.

Well yeah, HT/Transports won't work very well on Apartments or Grain Elevator, but could work on Barracks where they could cover most of the side routes or modify the maps so they can go down 1 or 2 main roads between the buildings.

as far as gameplay and bugs go, yeah. i'd like to see that fixed first. there's still just too many little things that get in the way of the fun. that list is best stated on another thread to avoid getting off track on this one.

Fair enough.
 

Sensemann

FNG / Fresh Meat
May 10, 2009
1,147
269
0
Shanghai, China
and unloading more of your pointless trolling and b*tching.

I've never even seen you post anything constructive or useful in any thread.....

I've never even seen you post anything constructive or useful in any thread.....

all you do is hi-jack threads to further b*tch about things you don't like and to fling poop at myself and everyone else who you don't agree with.

You haven't even directed any response to the original post or the topic for that matter...... thus troll

Good.... go piss off somewhere else then, cuz nobody has any interest in you and your self-righteous, self-entitled emo crap.

Nobody gives a sh*t what you care about anymore, I don't, nobody else in here does and by your own words, apparently the Devs don't either.....

so why don't you just take your precious drama queen troll bullsh*t off to Call of Duty where you and your kind belong.

We get it..... you're a troll who has nothing better to do than to go into the forums of a game you don't like to insult & flame all the members and troll-hard about how much you don't like the game and how nobody listens to you.

What a spectacular waste of time you are......

and I bet you didn't even read any of this because it's more than two sentences long and too complicated for you to keep all in your head at once.

You couldn't fail more if you tried.

What did you have for breakfast? Are you a rapper or sth?

Now I don't know if you wrote it or some other dude, but certainly I agree that the "hijacking" of threads where people state that they like the game is strange at the very least. If the criticism is well-sorted and more than "this game sucks" and the like, I think it's absolutely fine to have it posted anywhere, also on threads like yours where you try to tell us this game is perfect. If people like you can enjoy RO 2 in it's current state, I accept that, it's your opinion. Continue playing and enjoy.

For many, this is not the case and those tend to mostly be (I am talking about the guys that are active on the forum, not the unknown group of players that is not playing RO 2 anymore or never appeared on the forums) guys that have played RO for years, many even played the game in it's early mod stages. And those loyal fans and customers seem, majorly, to dislike certain game aspects. Those are also the guys that have stated their problems, concerns, dislikes and so on numerous times, mostly without any responses from TWI.

I told you this before: If you don't understand what's the problem for many of us complaining, check the forum posts between December 2010 and July 2011, where many of the features were finally addressed by TWI and the community started worrying.
The features that are now the ones leading to all this unhappiness and to put it in your words "trolling and b*tching" were presented one after another.

For me personally, if I didn't know RO 2's predecessor and the forums full of the features and improvements RO 2 would have brought compared to it's predecessor, I would have probably said "RO2 is a great game".

However, being able to compare RO 2 to RO-mod and keeping in mind the statements and promises from TWI, I feel that RO 2 is not just a let down, but I even go so far to say that I have been mislead. While I am in no way saying that TWI pulled this off to get the extra cash to dump the game and its community afterwards, like a dude in another thread wants to make us believe that RAMM said in the beta that they even did not create the realism mode, I feel that they tried the big shot, no matter the costs.

And this has broken trust and an outrage of people and in my eyes this is absolutely their right. If you are on a crusade to convince people that this game is the must-have-best-game-of-all-times, then fine. Continue doing so. But accept if people dislike it. I think 95% of the people on this forum are old and mature enough to make a distinction between a guy saying "This game is da fail, f*** TWI" and someone that either likes/dislikes the game, but coming up with an explanation that doesn't sound like straight from the ghetto.

And if any Moderator reads this, please consider to take this dump up-/downvoting off these forums. Since it was initiated, the "climate" of this forum has become pretty cold, as if anybody needs to see green/red dots behind a name to judge if that person is posting sth valid or not. I think we are all old enough to judge by ourselves...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Golf33 and THD

Cpt-Praxius

FNG / Fresh Meat
Dec 12, 2005
3,300
1,667
0
Canadian in Australia
..... also on threads like yours where you try to tell us this game is perfect.

If I thought the game was perfect, I wouldn't be making threads adding suggestions and ideas to make it better, would I? This thread simply wouldn't exist.

If people like you can enjoy RO 2 in it's current state, I accept that, it's your opinion. Continue playing and enjoy.

For many, this is not the case and those tend to mostly be .... guys that have played RO for years, many even played the game in it's early mod stages. And those loyal fans and customers seem, majorly, to dislike certain game aspects.

Yes, I am aware of this and I've played RO since the mod days as well.... this thread was created with those people in mind, where I was trying to tie in a possibility as to why RO2 just doesn't seem to fit past RO's that they have played, specifically how there are few vehicles in the game for players to use, thus less available tactics and easier ability for players to run and gun.

I was suggesting that if vehicles such as HT's and other transports were added into the game and into some of the current maps, I suspect that the tactics and combat in RO2 would start to shift more towards what players are familiar with in past RO's.

Everything I posted in my original post of this thread were based on my own observations of what's different between RO2 and past RO's...... I said I enjoy RO2 as it currently is, but I also acknowledged that there are issues that still need to be resolved and I was suggesting possibilities to resolve some of these issues.

But rather than someone coming in and saying "no, adding vehicles into the game won't make much of a difference in gameplay or interest" or "yes, I think this could be a step in the right direction" I instead got crap flung my way about writing long posts and further trashing RO2 in general as if nothing can be done, the game just sucks and that's it.

Those are also the guys that have stated their problems, concerns, dislikes and so on numerous times, mostly without any responses from TWI.

Well I never get any responses from Tripwrie from any of my posts.... does that mean I should start stomping my feet and spamming the same crap into every thread I come across?

I told you this before: If you don't understand what's the problem for many of us complaining, check the forum posts between December 2010 and July 2011, where many of the features were finally addressed by TWI and the community started worrying.

I know full well what many of the problems these people have with the game, which range from performance issues, low player count, gameplay physics, differences between past RO's and RO2, level progression..... the list goes on and on.

And as I have been telling many people.... try reading exactly what I type and try not to imagine hidden messages in what I am trying to say.

The reason why most of my posts are so long, is because too many people either mis-quote me thinking I am saying something completely different or if I write something short and sweet, people start to assume I mean something I never said and thus..... I continue having to make even longer posts trying to clarify my position when I shouldn't have to.

As I already said, I acknowledge these issues of these people in the community.... this thread was to suggest a possible fix (among many other fixes) that could get RO2 back along the lines of past RO's, in the way these players want.

I even made this thread:
Some Middle Ground Changes:
http://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/showthread.php?t=71491

In order to help get many of the main things these people want in the game, in the game, without causing more issues with those who want the game to remain they way it is.

Yet even when I do this, it's either ignored or I'm just told I'm being a Tripwire/RO2 Fanboy who sees nothing wrong with the game and it's perfect...... even when I'm clearly trying to acknowledge these problems and suggestion possible solutions.

So I'm not sure what else you expect from me..... but after a while, one just no longer can give a crap and cater to these people when they simply don't listen and just assume what your position is without reading what you write.

The features that are now the ones leading to all this unhappiness and to put it in your words "trolling and b*tching" were presented one after another.

No, what I consider trolling and b*tching is when someone comes into a specific thread talking about a specific topic or idea and posting the same complaints, the same issues and the same crap over and over again, while completely ignoring the original thread topic..... which is hi-jacking and when it happens in just about every thread I enter and when it's almost the same wording each time, that's trolling..... or at the very least, spamming.

If someone at least addressed the original topic first and then went on with their usual rant..... or ranted on right away but at least tried to tie it into the actual thread topic, I wouldn't have room to complain.

But anytime I see a thread talking about ideas or suggestions on what to add or change to make the game better, the topic is suddenly hi-jacked and shift off into another direction by the same 2-3 usual suspects..... who don't even make an attempt to address the actual topic of debate.

So if they're not even going to address the real topic of the thread, why should I try and address their issues they keep bringing up?

For me personally, if I didn't know RO 2's predecessor and the forums full of the features and improvements RO 2 would have brought compared to it's predecessor, I would have probably said "RO2 is a great game".

However, being able to compare RO 2 to RO-mod and keeping in mind the statements and promises from TWI, I feel that RO 2 is not just a let down, but I even go so far to say that I have been mislead. While I am in no way saying that TWI pulled this off to get the extra cash to dump the game and its community afterwards, like a dude in another thread wants to make us believe that RAMM said in the beta that they even did not create the realism mode, I feel that they tried the big shot, no matter the costs.

And this has broken trust and an outrage of people and in my eyes this is absolutely their right. If you are on a crusade to convince people that this game is the must-have-best-game-of-all-times, then fine. Continue doing so. But accept if people dislike it.

I'm not on a crusade to get everybody to go buy this game or to state that it's the best game of all time.... the original post I made in this thread alone should be proof of this, as I was trying to shed light on existing problems in RO2, not just in gameplay but in community and player counts, and I was trying to suggest a possible quick-fix in the time being to resolve some of the problems I pointed out in my original post.

I don't go out and tell people to buy or not buy a game.... what others do or play is no concern of mine and I couldn't care less.

But for those interested in improving and moving RO2 into the right direction, I will post ideas, thoughts and suggestions towards fixing them, and I try my best to make those suggestions meet many of the demands or thoughts of both sides of the argument in question.

Obviously I don't hit the mark all the time.

I think 95% of the people on this forum are old and mature enough to make a distinction between a guy saying "This game is da fail, f*** TWI" and someone that either likes/dislikes the game, but coming up with an explanation that doesn't sound like straight from the ghetto.

And if any Moderator reads this, please consider to take this dump up-/downvoting off these forums. Since it was initiated, the "climate" of this forum has become pretty cold, as if anybody needs to see green/red dots behind a name to judge if that person is posting sth valid or not. I think we are all old enough to judge by ourselves...

True, I wouldn't care either way if the rep system was removed..... and like I said, if people have issues with the game or complaints.... by all means, express yourself like everybody else, but rather than just stomping your feet and ranting on about what you don't like or hate, at least provide solutions to the problem and keep them relative to the thread in question.

The more one spams the same thing over and over again, from thread to thread, the less their issues are taken seriously.

My issue was never with those who don't like RO2 as it currently is.... my issue is towards people who continually hi-jack thread topics to continue to talk about the exact same things over and over again like what we're doing right now.

There's piles of threads already where people are talking about these things, why does it need to be continually dragged into other topics?

I was actually interested in getting some serious responses towards my original post..... I was actually interested in a number of other thread topics, which were all hi-jack to talk about this same stuff.

Frankly, even when someone tried to make a completely different/new topic to discuss, it always ends up being a rage-war over the same things over and over and over again.

Does anybody even remember what the topic was in this thread anymore?

Since every single thread these days are hi-jacked so the same people can argue and complain about the same things over and over again, what's the point in being here anymore? The same handfull of members are constantly derailing every thread in order to keep necro-complaining about their same issues..... the only logical reason I can think of is because they think if they dominate and spam every thread so that the exact same topic is brought back over and over again, maybe it'll make a difference.

The only difference it's making is it's making more and more members leave these forums because it's a waste of time.
 
Last edited:

mowskwoz

FNG / Fresh Meat
Feb 7, 2011
305
75
0
Phoenix, Arizona
Well, you guys did it. The internet is full.

To all the "I like RO2" people, really, just don't feed the trolls. If you don't talk to them, they leave. Forums are one of the few places where if you ignore something long enough, it goes away.

To all the " I don't like RO2" people. I'm sorry the game isn't what you wanted. I'm sorry you spent money on it and feel ripped off. I've been there too. Complain about everything if you feel you must, but you're wasting your efforts. Here's the game. This is what it is. Once the SDK comes out maybe you or someone you know can make it how you want.

It's getting embarrassing in here with all this drama.

Up vote if you're tired of seeing yet another post about people's personal issues...
 

Sensemann

FNG / Fresh Meat
May 10, 2009
1,147
269
0
Shanghai, China
I was suggesting that if vehicles such as HT's and other transports were added into the game and into some of the current maps, I suspect that the tactics and combat in RO2 would start to shift more towards what players are familiar with in past RO's..

The only map of RO 2 which could use HTs imho is Pavlov's. Maybe with a HT, they could finally manage to get into the capzones on time and have a chance to win. In no other map, HTs are currently needed, because the maps are simply too small. On Commissar's, maybe, but if it was up to me, I would say no. Still too small of a map.

Well I never get any responses from Tripwrie from any of my posts.... does that mean I should start stomping my feet and spamming the same crap into every thread I come across?

No, you shouldn't. As much as I mentioned in my previous post. Those few hi-jackers are usually the ones that registered in the last couple of weeks pre-release and that have maybe 5 posts in total, from which 4 are "**** THIS GAME, IT'S ****". As mentioned before: Everybody can judge by himself how valid that qualitative feedback is.

Btw, I don't know "DiedTrying" except from the forums and he certainly doesn't need me to support him. But I have the feeling you 2 cannot come along with each other. None of my business. But I remember to have read several of his posts/threads where he brought up valid points. Maybe I have missed the part where you 2 started to see a red blanket in each other.


Yet even when I do this, it's either ignored or I'm just told I'm being a Tripwire/RO2 Fanboy who sees nothing wrong with the game and it's perfect...... even when I'm clearly trying to acknowledge these problems and suggestion possible solutions.

If this happens, you should probably think if this has sth to do with what you are writing, or what your message is and what the message is to the reader. We both could look at the very same thing and you telling me it's purple, while I say it's blue.

So I'm not sure what else you expect from me......

Mate, I don't expect nothing. I just think that if everybody reflects on himself a bit more, some people might come to a conclusion. To be honest, when this whole freaking pro/con war on RO 2 being an awesome game would happen face to face in a pub, the discussion would be over after 5 minutes, because people would not be willing to make a monkey out of themselves (I am not addressing you or anybody else here directly). In a forum, anonymity allows the wheel to spin over and over again, cause nobody gives a sh*t.


But for those interested in improving and moving RO2 into the right direction, I will post ideas, thoughts and suggestions towards fixing them, and I try my best to make those suggestions meet many of the demands or thoughts of both sides of the argument in question.

The forum is full of ideas on how to improve the game. In my eyes, it's now time for TWI to either deliver sth or give us an idea on what is going to be addressed in the future. Otherwise, we are sitting in the same boat and can prepare chips and coke for another couple of weeks of entertainment...
 
  • Like
Reactions: REZ

PHREAK76

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 2, 2011
28
10
0
They're only words.

They're only words.

Words words words words words words and some more words.

A quote filled with words words words words words words words words words words words words words words words words

Some more words underneath with a space.


Pointless insult with some blanked out b*tches and sh*ts thrown in for good measure.


Some long winded complaints. Followed by another quote

A word filled quote : words words words words words words words words words words words words words words words words words
A reply to the quote with yet more complaints and personal "observations".

A link to another thread I've written with yet more of my own suggestions as if I haven't given enough in the last 400 words.
[url]http://apointlessthreadivewritten.forums.tripwireinteractive.com[/URL]

Some BOLD TEXT....

Some more words made from text coloured in yellow (very nice)

A complaint to tripwire this time noless with some more words thrown into the mix for good measure, followed by some b*tching about no one ever listening to me.

Followed by another insult.


And after writing all that I'm ready to go all over again.
 

MtnMan01

FNG / Fresh Meat
Feb 17, 2006
266
21
0
Well, you guys did it. The internet is full.

To all the "I like RO2" people, really, just don't feed the trolls. If you don't talk to them, they leave. Forums are one of the few places where if you ignore something long enough, it goes away.

To all the " I don't like RO2" people. I'm sorry the game isn't what you wanted. I'm sorry you spent money on it and feel ripped off. I've been there too. Complain about everything if you feel you must, but you're wasting your efforts. Here's the game. This is what it is. Once the SDK comes out maybe you or someone you know can make it how you want.

It's getting embarrassing in here with all this drama.

Up vote if you're tired of seeing yet another post about people's personal issues...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Very Very well said Mowskwoz I couldn't agree more.

Cpt-Prax/Train,, Rock on. Please NO feeding the TROLLS!!;)
 
Last edited: