Second only to your willful ignorance.
And since it seems like you struggle with your plight, let me make it easier on you to understand how your own argument contradicts it self.
You still following?
So the concept of it not starting up still is substandard right? The "big big" issue magically goes away and doesn't come back until the majority are put out by it?
Please elaborate how the issue is then less serious if it's only encountered by the minority?
Because your logic is basically summarized as the following "This cancer has a 100% mortality rate, but we will let it go because only a few people are dying, yeah it sucks but we'll have to wait til the majority catch it before it becomes worth our time.
So spare me your moronic insults if you can't even understand what you're spouting and then have the confidence to be hypocritical about it.
And since it seems like you struggle with your plight, let me make it easier on you to understand how your own argument contradicts it self.
So the game being unable to start up at all should only be considered a "big big" issue if the majority suffers it?omano;n2296077 said:If the 'table was turned' as you say, of course it would change the problem because if everyone else (the big big majority) couldn't start the game at all there would be a big big obvious problem in the game.
You still following?
So the concept of it not starting up still is substandard right? The "big big" issue magically goes away and doesn't come back until the majority are put out by it?
Please elaborate how the issue is then less serious if it's only encountered by the minority?
Because your logic is basically summarized as the following "This cancer has a 100% mortality rate, but we will let it go because only a few people are dying, yeah it sucks but we'll have to wait til the majority catch it before it becomes worth our time.
So spare me your moronic insults if you can't even understand what you're spouting and then have the confidence to be hypocritical about it.
Last edited: