[Game] Breach
- Thread starter ERK
- Start date
Instead of simply disliking this post in all your loyalty you could actually answer my question.
Here's what I dug up.
Looks like there are 23 weapons.
[url]http://breachgame.com/weapons[/URL]
There are 5 classes (rifleman, gunner, support, sniper, and recon).
[url]http://breachgame.com/character-classes[/URL]
Also, there are 12 gadgets and 14 perks to customize your class.
[url]http://breachgame.com/gadgets[/URL]
As for the maps, I read somewhere there being 3 maps with one also having a night version. There's also a 4th map that unlocks like we saw with BC2: Vietnam.
Looks like there are 23 weapons.
[url]http://breachgame.com/weapons[/URL]
There are 5 classes (rifleman, gunner, support, sniper, and recon).
[url]http://breachgame.com/character-classes[/URL]
Also, there are 12 gadgets and 14 perks to customize your class.
[url]http://breachgame.com/gadgets[/URL]
As for the maps, I read somewhere there being 3 maps with one also having a night version. There's also a 4th map that unlocks like we saw with BC2: Vietnam.
I noticed this, too. I wonder how much rage it causes with gun nuts when they spell names wrong...
This looks like it could be fun, especially for $20. The third person is a bit odd though, and the destruction doesn't look as good as it is in BC2.
Also, why do the gunshots all. Sound. The same. Every shot that went whizzing past the player's head had that whooshing "pew" sound.
Also, why do the gunshots all. Sound. The same. Every shot that went whizzing past the player's head had that whooshing "pew" sound.
Uhh, they have real(istic) and complete destruction whereas in BC2 buildings are destroyed always on pre-set areas, so how is it better exactly?
I mostly meant visually. In BC2 the destruction (to me) is beautiful and satisfying, whereas in this game it looks like a bunch of matches collapsing.
hockeywarrior
FNG / Fresh Meat
Lol that military dude doing the demonstration cracked me up. I love how he talked about how super realistic all the features of the game were, and yet never justified the 3rd person cover system with real world comparisons.
I mean the game might be fun -- I'm just criticizing the presenter's arguments. He was being inconsistently focused on realism. While he touted the realistic ballistics, suppression, tactics, and stuff like that, he failed to mention how someone should be able to see around corners without actually LOOKING around them ... and hence why the 3rd person cover system makes no sense.
Oh well lol, I just get a kick out of these guys.
I mean the game might be fun -- I'm just criticizing the presenter's arguments. He was being inconsistently focused on realism. While he touted the realistic ballistics, suppression, tactics, and stuff like that, he failed to mention how someone should be able to see around corners without actually LOOKING around them ... and hence why the 3rd person cover system makes no sense.
Oh well lol, I just get a kick out of these guys.
I thought I'm the troll here!Fixed
That definitely isn't realistic destruction, I'll even go out on a branch and say that BC2's destruction system is more realistic, for the simply reason being that buildings are not made out of matches there and won't collaps when being hit by one single 40mm grenade.
The game is as far from reality in every aspect as BC2, it just has a slightly fancier destruction system and a 3rd person cover system. I mean, just watch the gameplay. Unfortunately they market this game as "realistic", which turns it from a might buy game into a "No way I'm gonna buy that" game.
Guys, at last be honest with yourselves and the game. It's NOT realistic in any way.
Last edited:
I thought I'm the troll here!
That definitely isn't realistic destruction, I'll even go out on a branch and say that BC2's destruction system is more realistic, for the simply reason being that buildings are not made out of matches there and won't collaps when being hit by one single 40mm grenade.
The game is as far from reality in every aspect as BC2, it just has a slightly fancier destruction system and a 3rd person cover system. I mean, just watch the gameplay. Unfortunately they market this game as "realistic", which turns it from a might buy game into a "No way I'm gonna buy that" game.
Guys, at last be honest with yourselves and the game. It's NOT realistic in any way.
For the average gamer ArmA2 isn't the standard of realism.
Tripwire spoils us with their first person cover system and blind fire that is actually blind, don't they?
No, for the average gamer even CoD is realistic*
*as i've heard many of them exclaim, even in some reviews.
Realistic? Really? They've showed in multiple videos a guy shooting out a single wood log support for a building nestled on a hill resulting in the entire building falling apart.
I don't see this as being much more advanced than BC2's destruction either, at least not in the way it's used. You can just pinpoint in greater detail what you want to destroy but the end result in gameplay does not seem to make much of a difference from what I'm seeing. Granted, I haven't looked to far into this.
The graphics aren't too bad but I'm not digging the overly simplistic (cartoony) designs and the first person weapons look very budgety.
Still, it doesn't look awful, and I'd be more than willing to download a demo (is there one?). I still probably won't bite for even a $20 price tag considering HOS is right around the corner and it really doesn't look all that different than BC2 as was said.
I don't see this as being much more advanced than BC2's destruction either, at least not in the way it's used. You can just pinpoint in greater detail what you want to destroy but the end result in gameplay does not seem to make much of a difference from what I'm seeing. Granted, I haven't looked to far into this.
The graphics aren't too bad but I'm not digging the overly simplistic (cartoony) designs and the first person weapons look very budgety.
Still, it doesn't look awful, and I'd be more than willing to download a demo (is there one?). I still probably won't bite for even a $20 price tag considering HOS is right around the corner and it really doesn't look all that different than BC2 as was said.
hockeywarrior
FNG / Fresh Meat
My biggest issue with the game is that the whole destruction thing looks like a gameplay gimmick to me. It should be a FEATURE of the game, not a main gameplay element. If I want physics at the center of a game I'll play Garry's Mod or something like that.
