Its not insta-heal,if you take another hit at the body part you bandaged(which is non-lethal normally) you are done.(Or if you take another hit at a lethal part which is always 1 hit or slow death)In my more than 100 hours of experience,I have never ran out of bandages,because I usually die after I bandage once or just die or get in slow death.
Whereas in BF3,you can live through a 20 minute game without dying and eating up 1000 bullets if you take cover every few seconds.It must be really difficult to decide which is realistic huh?(You are probably trolling so I'm not gonna try hard.)
Gentlemen,If you'd stop giggling like a school girl or throwing bull**** for an hour or two,go play RO2 on a 64 player server w/ full realism and w/ territory gamemode.
Playing RO2 Firefight with 16 people and relaxed realism surely would feel/look "not realistic".And the videos you sent doesn't mean anything to me,watched the last one before and it was just bull****,I can do it on ANY game of your choice.(Or find such a video,which is even easier)
I've played BF since BF1942,and it was NEVER a "realistic shooter".It had some features here and there,but it is an arcade shooter in core.And since BF3 feels more like a Bad Company title,its even less realistic and more arcade.(and cod-ish apparently).It'd actually be decent if it was like BF2 and not BC2.
Last edited:
