I think a lot of people have "Orkish" views on what a firefight is, they think its people blasting away at each other with 'dakka' until one sides has to flee which is not how it would be done. People seem to support this idea by saying the US army used 23'000 rounds per insurgent death in Iraq but that wrong way of look at it, its has been American doctrine to fire a **** load of ammo into anything that looks like a threat for a very long time and they fire that amount not to kill but save lives by suppressing threats. During WW2 all sides did their best to avoid "firefights", the yanks would dump ammo on everything they did not the sight of, the Germans moved up their heavy MGs to machine gun everything, the British shelled the **** out everything and the Russians would throw everything but the kitchen sink at every threat. What we would call a firefights was too "risky"as the one of the rules of Warfare is to ensure that there are no even battles...
Just keep in mind that vast majority of deaths in WW2 were due to artillery, bombing and people not even seeing what killed them rather than the firefights would see in games which would be rare in WW2...
TBH the best thing about BF3 is the soundtrack:
Battlefield 3 [Soundtrack] - Track 02 - Thunder Run - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4D2C266F9563A09A
Just keep in mind that vast majority of deaths in WW2 were due to artillery, bombing and people not even seeing what killed them rather than the firefights would see in games which would be rare in WW2...
TBH the best thing about BF3 is the soundtrack:
Battlefield 3 [Soundtrack] - Track 02 - Thunder Run - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4D2C266F9563A09A
Last edited: