- - - snip - - -
Back to the point.....the USMC used a stripped down lighter version of the BAR without attachments for use specifically in the jungles.
Agreed. Let the TRUTH be known.
- - - snip - - -
Back to the point.....the USMC used a stripped down lighter version of the BAR without attachments for use specifically in the jungles.
Not rude at all ...just to the point. No offense meant simply sticking to the reality of it all.
It was understood but too generalized... Only time they used the Bipods was when "ordered" to do so. "Most", as indicated, never came into question....
Obviously, you've never tried to move quickly in and through jungle growth with a twenty pound weapon attempting to stay alive and having your folded or unfolded Bipod's legs snagging everything in sight. Or, having the Bipod on and open on a beachhead firing the weapon and watching it bury itself in the sand/loose soil/mud. Rest assured, there were none keeping that thing on their weapon. Besides, removing it reduced the weight by approx three pounds.
And you have? Mike spare us the bull****, your old but I dont think your quite old enough to be a WW2 vet.![]()
Why must most all debates wind up in the throes of personal attacks?
Probably because your responses have a rather patronising, dismissive air about them. I'm sure that wasn't the intention, but that's the way it appeared, so don't be surprised when people get defensive.
Back on topic, I'm willing to accept that no Marines in the Pacific theatre ever used the BAR bipod. That said, from a gameplay perspective I think it's a nice feature and marks the BAR out more as a support weapon, rather than just a bit automatic rifle. I feel more encouraged to use it for suppressive duties.