-1. This is a bad idea. So long as the dart bug is fixed, all will be well with the world. Or at least the part of it the Medic needs.
Area of Effect darts
- Thread starter Crow72
- Start date
what i mean is, when you hit DJ Skully's backpack, or hit someone's arm, it doesn't count but instead counts as a wall or something similar.
I mean to make it so that hitting Skully's bag or someone's arm counts as healing and not as clipping a wall.
Last edited:
Shouldn't be the case, since as I said it uses a single collision cylinder; it doesn't detect collision on different parts on the character.
I sometimes get false positives even when I hit the guy directly. Annoying when it happens. I would rather have that fixed then AOE dart.
False positives happen all of the time. My experience is similar to Candlejack's, but to be honest a player can be standing still, facing me, and I can shoot them dead center mass with a dart and the first one will still glitch out at a rate of maybe 20%.
Real men get it in the face. :IS2:
Aiming for the leg guarantees a heal because when you aim for the head and torso, you are hitting the ExtendedZCollision which stops the heal from working sometimes :O
I was fine with Medic when the Syringe was fixed. A ranged healing device was just gravy. IMO, the class doesn't need to have healing any easier.
Wierd, when I was debugging with a hitscan shotgun I programmed, it seemed that some sort of collision cylinder around a player was blocking the damage or effects from killing the player so I just added in a line of code that fixed that and it sure enough, it worked.
i would say yes to AoE darts as long as the down side is either:
1)They take all 100 charge instead of 50 for normal.
or
2)They heal less than normal healing darts.
1)They take all 100 charge instead of 50 for normal.
or
2)They heal less than normal healing darts.
Last edited:
I don't understand
I don't understand randomly getting voted down for no reason either
No reason at all.
Why not vote up instead?
I don't understand randomly getting voted down for no reason either
No reason at all.
Why not vote up instead?
I'm getting used to it, got 3 vote downs for saying I like the m4 and 2 vote downs for saying I prefer to start with more expensive guns than otherwise. :/
Good thing I didn't even started a new thread yet, that'd be like -10
I'm getting used to it, got 3 vote downs for saying I like the m4 and 2 vote downs for saying I prefer to start with more expensive guns than otherwise. :/
Good thing I didn't even started a new thread yet, that'd be like -10
People in this forum do not like the M4, why? Because its an american gun I'm guessing. And it's no surprise why you got 2 votes down for saying you prefer to start with more expensive guns.
Sorry for hijacking the thread.
Which is even worse because half+ the guns of this game are already american, it pisses me off that people are completely ignorant of origins of guns and which countries uses which guns, they take the game as reference and simply because the gun is in KF they immediately assume the gun is british and M4 is not used by any other nation other than USA. I really never found any reference saying the british army ever used a SCAR, really, the only thing I could find is that they were studying the adoption of SCAR by the SAS and even then I found no official reference to this, oddly enough the SAS and SBS are using the C8SFW (info from the official UK army webpage) which is guess what ? A variation of M4 built by a Canadian company. Yet I get people voting me down for supporting the M4, lol
And how is it bad to say that I prefer to start with xbow than lar since xbow sells for 600 and lar costs 200, meaning you can simply sell the xbow after wave 1, get the LAR and profit 400 ? You'd need to be a idiot/elitist not to start with the most expensive guns if you had the choice.
@ro_sauce
I think so. I just hope that getting too much negatives don't mean instaban or something like that...
Which is even worse because half+ the guns of this game are already american, it pisses me off that people are completely ignorant of origins of guns and which countries uses which guns, they take the game as reference and simply because the gun is in KF they immediately assume the gun is british and M4 is not used by any other nation other than USA. I really never found any reference saying the british army ever used a SCAR, really, the only thing I could find is that they were studying the adoption of SCAR by the SAS and even then I found no official reference to this, oddly enough the SAS and SBS are using the C8SFW (info from the official UK army webpage) which is guess what ? A variation of M4 built by a Canadian company. Yet I get people voting me down for supporting the M4, lol
And how is it bad to say that I prefer to start with xbow than lar since xbow sells for 600 and lar costs 200, meaning you can simply sell the xbow after wave 1, get the LAR and profit 400 ? You'd need to be a idiot/elitist not to start with the most expensive guns if you had the choice.
@ro_sauce
I think so. I just hope that getting too much negatives don't mean instaban or something like that...
The little Like? thing at the bottom right of every post?