Another "great" preview

  • Please make sure you are familiar with the forum rules. You can find them here: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/index.php?threads/forum-rules.2334636/

Feuer76

FNG / Fresh Meat
Dec 4, 2008
45
12
0
From what i read *reviewer* is shell shocked by RO2-he likes it but his fondness of brainless FPS shooters prevails in most of the review points.

I think he will continue to play COD in the future.
 

Atavax

FNG / Fresh Meat
Jul 26, 2011
39
17
0
From what i read *reviewer* is shell shocked by RO2-he likes it but his fondness of brainless FPS shooters prevails in most of the review points.

I think he will continue to play COD in the future.


Its sad that there are people that actually think like this. Is that the excuse you convinced yourself to believe? You're bad at bf and cod games because you're smart and they are brainless shooters? Thats so sad... A good player in any shooter, whether its a cod, a bf, a tf, a cs, a ro, or whatever is going to be thinking just as strategically as any other.
 

Shakermaker

FNG / Fresh Meat
Aug 2, 2011
131
36
0
Amsterdam
Its sad that there are people that actually think like this. Is that the excuse you convinced yourself to believe? You're bad at bf and cod games because you're smart and they are brainless shooters? Thats so sad... A good player in any shooter, whether its a cod, a bf, a tf, a cs, a ro, or whatever is going to be thinking just as strategically as any other.

Nail on the head. Different game mechanics call for different strategies. One of my favorite online shooters is TF2, but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy RO and it clearly doesn't mean I use the same tactics in both games.
 

gyps

FNG / Fresh Meat
May 5, 2009
822
73
0
Tbh not sure what to make of this the tranlation leaves much to be disired
and doesn't make a lot of sense.

So until someone who speak polish actually translates it will be hard to judge what he's trying to get over
 

TheDude101

FNG / Fresh Meat
Aug 15, 2011
65
15
0
I don't know why people are getting antsy about little things like this. All my favorite games, even the popular ones, have mediocre-bad reviews from one or two magazines listed on metacritic.

On top of that the maps aren't small and I haven't even played. Just from watching videos some of them look medium sized compared to RO1, and some still look large or even larger(Cept some tank maps, those were ridiculous, quit making them for RO and go play T-72 steel balkans or whatever.)

I just think too many new players pre-ordered with barley an idea of what Red Orchestra was, and are scared of what it will be. And a bunch of old players who are scared that it will turn out like COD. Like one player was upset about unlocks until he read that you wont be able to run around realism servers with a kar98k on russian side unless you pick it off the ground.

Another player was worried about the sounds not being in a native language for his team. Do you have any idea how big a pain of the *** it is to be screaming for machine gun ammo and have 5-10 teamates run past you? Just with this problem they made an awesome decision IMO, keep enemy voices so you still crap yourself when Germans are whispering giberish in the ruins next door, but understand your teamates so you know about that grenade.

Just watch the gameplay videos if your doubting it. The almost month old videos look awesome. Hell even the AI looks at least looks STALKER: Clear Skys competant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: u-s-e-r

D_Pawel

FNG / Fresh Meat
Aug 15, 2011
1
5
0
Apos -> Thx for linking this preview, but few things:
1. I enjoyed playing beta RO2 after first bad impression (and I wrote this in preview),
2. I didn't write "maps are very smal", only "maps are smaller than in FH2"

I wrote impressions-based-preview (no review!) and problem with Red Orchestra 2 beta is that many features aren't now available - tanks for example. In conclusion I wrote, that I wait with my final judgment to final version of the game (despite fact, that even if RO2 will have smaller scale than FH2, I will enjoy playing this game because of its atmosphere).

" has this person played RO1?"
I played. Not very long but yes, I played.

"If he liked BFBC2 and disliked RO2 that means RO2 is awesome!!!"

I like both games :>.

[Sorry for any mistakes in language]
 
Last edited:

TheDude101

FNG / Fresh Meat
Aug 15, 2011
65
15
0
Its sad that there are people that actually think like this. Is that the excuse you convinced yourself to believe? You're bad at bf and cod games because you're smart and they are brainless shooters? Thats so sad... A good player in any shooter, whether its a cod, a bf, a tf, a cs, a ro, or whatever is going to be thinking just as strategically as any other.

No I don't play BF and COD because it takes half a magazine to kill someone. And as such I don't respect the opinion of people who like that game, when it comes to other games, especially anything with a pysics engine. Nothing to do with strategy(Tactics at this level btw.)
 

teemu92

Grizzled Veteran
May 31, 2011
1,050
140
63
Finland
www.youtube.com
ZNJ6I.jpg


Why?
Its a thing for originpc nothing to do with the EA thing.
 

doomis

FNG / Fresh Meat
Jun 18, 2009
570
98
0
Glad you came to clear things out Pawel, it's easy to get carried away when something you like a lot does not make others think the same ;), hope you get your hands on a more polished and finished game soon.
 

Icey_Pain

FNG / Fresh Meat
Aug 8, 2011
706
304
0
For a reviewer to review a game properly, he or she should be a gamer in my opinion. Somebody that can flawlessly use the control scheme of any game.

A game reviewer should be able to extract the essence of a game and put it into well formulated words and correct sentences. To do that a reviewer must be able to adapt to the aggressiveness or defensiveness of a game.

RO1 and 2 are defensive in nature, since you need to defend your life and that of your comrades. These days most games take an aggressive stance on how to play the game.

Most game reviewers these days actually lack the experience to adapt their playing style to the game. And with defensive play being the minority of the games, it gives the newbie reviewers something that they can not adapt to. Which is why they can't seem to get their fun out of it.

Which to me is more a problem of a lack of experience than anything else.
 

HellBilly

FNG / Fresh Meat
Jun 13, 2011
197
145
0
why arent these reviewers playing the firefight game mode?

thats what its for .. no classes, no objective .. just play
 

Faneca

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 16, 2010
1,150
778
0
Portugal
Here guy compares new RO2 to BF2/BC2/FH2 and says that game looks bad ("game is just ugly"), game learning curve is long, maps are very small, LMGs are useless in attack and firefights aren't intense.

>RO2 looking ugly
>very small maps
>LMGs useless in attack
>non-intensive firefights

Now this just is just a troll.
 

Krazyxazn

FNG / Fresh Meat
Mar 23, 2009
407
117
0
He's just silly, ignore his preview.

Everything he says is like opposite of what other previewers are saying :p