I've gotten a one shot rifle kill on a moving target on the large park map from something like 240m. There are a few maps where 300m is possible, but ... yeah, that does seem a bit outlandish.
75% kills head shoots
- Thread starter Sir Reginald
- Start date
I've gotten a one shot rifle kill on a moving target on the large park map from something like 240m. There are a few maps where 300m is possible, but ... yeah, that does seem a bit outlandish.
I don't think they weapons are to accurate at all in RO2.
As a matter of fact, the accuracy are a lot more realistic than in RO ost. Unfortunately, It's the opposite with the weaponhandling itself.
The weapons have no weight and you can throw them around like they were made out of paper - even weapons such as the MG. It was the same in RO OST aswell but instead the weapons were inaccurate. There is no need to line up shots either. It's more or less instant aim with perfect precision. The weaponhandling in RO OST portrayed the weapons in a lot more realistic manner than in RO2 simply because the weapons required skill to use which is exactly the case in real life. I am not going to argue if the drunken sway or the inaccurate weapons are realistic or not - because by fact they aren't - but it did portray the weaponhandling a lot more realistic than in RO2. If you would give the Germans the ability to use all WW2 weapons as in RO2 the outcome of the war would have been diffrent. It requires no genius to say that quite a lot less than 75% of all deaths on the field the terms of gunfire in WW2 were done by shots to the head. Simple weaponhandling may work well in games like BF were you can take a lot more damage but if you mix simple weaponhandling with easy deaths the gameplay becomes highly unbalanced.
As a matter of fact, the accuracy are a lot more realistic than in RO ost. Unfortunately, It's the opposite with the weaponhandling itself.
The weapons have no weight and you can throw them around like they were made out of paper - even weapons such as the MG. It was the same in RO OST aswell but instead the weapons were inaccurate. There is no need to line up shots either. It's more or less instant aim with perfect precision. The weaponhandling in RO OST portrayed the weapons in a lot more realistic manner than in RO2 simply because the weapons required skill to use which is exactly the case in real life. I am not going to argue if the drunken sway or the inaccurate weapons are realistic or not - because by fact they aren't - but it did portray the weaponhandling a lot more realistic than in RO2. If you would give the Germans the ability to use all WW2 weapons as in RO2 the outcome of the war would have been diffrent. It requires no genius to say that quite a lot less than 75% of all deaths on the field the terms of gunfire in WW2 were done by shots to the head. Simple weaponhandling may work well in games like BF were you can take a lot more damage but if you mix simple weaponhandling with easy deaths the gameplay becomes highly unbalanced.
Yeah, agreed. Also, I dare anyone to paste a screenshot of their stats showing 75% headshots.
First of all - some sway or weapon weight added to weapon and longer ADS time after moving would be good to make rapid movement and aiming less effective. It should be possible to be done, but not as effective as it can be right now.
On the other hand shooting targets in the head is not impossible the closer your enemy and when he is not moving. Most of my long distance headshots are done when my targets are standing still and I have a good view on their heads.
On the other hand shooting targets in the head is not impossible the closer your enemy and when he is not moving. Most of my long distance headshots are done when my targets are standing still and I have a good view on their heads.
Last edited:
