I haven't heard about this before, it is only now that I was made aware of the incident. The footage revealed is, well, rather disturbing.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/business/2009/g20/7988812.stm
To my eyes, the man is conspicuously trying to keep a low-profile, evidently trying not to draw attention or appear to be protesting. In a situation like that, with a worked-up crowd all over the place, and he's strolling with his hands in his pockets, looking at his feet? That's like the Nazca lines of wanting to be left alone.
But that doesn't work, does it? Aight, remember this: when there's a protest around, you DO NOT want to be found in the street, just for the pure freak chance of an unprovoked incident.
EDIT: As an afterthought - was it the Milwall top that riled up the policeman so much? Did his threat prioritisation fail that hard?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/business/2009/g20/7988812.stm
To my eyes, the man is conspicuously trying to keep a low-profile, evidently trying not to draw attention or appear to be protesting. In a situation like that, with a worked-up crowd all over the place, and he's strolling with his hands in his pockets, looking at his feet? That's like the Nazca lines of wanting to be left alone.
But that doesn't work, does it? Aight, remember this: when there's a protest around, you DO NOT want to be found in the street, just for the pure freak chance of an unprovoked incident.
EDIT: As an afterthought - was it the Milwall top that riled up the policeman so much? Did his threat prioritisation fail that hard?
Last edited: