Who is right - Serbia or the inhabitants of Kosovo?
And who gave the UN and NATO the right to decide?
And who gave the UN and NATO the right to decide?
the entire globe supports an independent Kosovo!
thats not true
Oh right, I suppose you mean the Russians? Well it is an independent state now. See an Ruskie armour rolling in?
If you want to find out whose for or against it you cant go far wrong with the BBC news site. Bur I find it hard to believe that only Russia and Serbia have an objection to it. Any country with a region in dispute would have a reason to be not so keen on the idea of Kosovo's independence.Would you like to back up your statements with some sources?
-in that they won a battle in that region in the 1300s
Then they treated the Kosavars as trash, and they have been on the giving end of oppression and genocide, so the Serbs don't get any benefits of any doubt in this case.
From 1961 to 1980, 92, 197 Serbs and 20, 424 Montenegrins migrated out of Kosovo. Following the separatist riots in 1981, another 38,000 Serbs and Montenegrins migrated out of Kosovo. This silent and invisible ethnic cleansing and expulsion of the Kosovo Serbian population was not documented or condemned by the US government, media, or human rights groups. Such human rights violations against the Serbian Orthodox population of Kosovo led to instability.
The KLA secessionist and separatist terrorist war begun in 1998 had as its goal the expulsion of the non-Albanian population of Kosovo, Orthodox Serbs, Roma, Turks. The KLA indiscriminately murdered Kosovo Serb civilians, policemen, government officials, and Albanians tha t did not support secession. The US government and media, however, never presented the Kosovo Crisis as a separatist or secessionist conflict, but instead, as a conflict based on human rights violations and minority rights violations against the Albanian population. The Kosovo Crisis was a secessionist conflict. The US government and media sought to create an imperative for military intervention in Kosovo through propaganda. How was this done? The standard and established propaganda formula or paradigm was followed. In all propaganda meant to lead to war, atrocities are a fundamental element. Atrocities were needed. None were forthcoming. The US allies and proxies then were ordered to step up their attacks on the Serbian population and security forces. The KLA responded by murdering Yugoslav policemen and Serbian farmers. In Pec, six Serbian teen-aged youths were brutally murdered. KLA troops based in Albania increased their infiltration of Kosovo
Unlike Palestinians, Kurds, or Basques, Albanians already have a homeland or home country, Albania or Shqiperia. Their claim to Serbian territory is thus not valid. What Albanian separatists seek is the creation of a Greater Albania, a readjustment of borders, territorial aggrandizement at the expense of a neighboring, sovereign state. The Kosovo crisis is reminiscent of the Suden crisis in the 1930s. The Sudenland , a region of Czechoslovakia, was made up of 3.2 ethnic Germans, over 90% of the population of the region, who demanded secession from Czechoslovakia. Such a secession would be unacceptable to any sovereign state and would inevitably lead to war. In 1938 the Munich Agreement resulted which led to the secession of the Sudenland
This technique was employed by novelist and free-lance writer Susan Sontag who portrayed the Muslims as "secular", "urbanized", "cosmopolitan", "tolerant", who are, "after all, just like us", that is, just like the nation that is being persuaded to militarily intervene, the US. Remarkably, to the Muslim world, Muslim propaganda portrayed itself just like them, i.e., militant and radical Muslims seeking to establish a Muslim fundamentalist state in the heart of the infidel Europe. In appealing to the US to intervene, the propaganda sought to show that the Muslims are plain folks, like you and me.
Bad attitude to albanians after the WW2 will shine a new light if one will read a thing or two about what division Skadenberg with albanian soldiers did there to serbian civilians.Conversely, Orthodox Serbs were portrayed by racist stereotypes of the enemy, the other, "them", as uncivilized, backward, "mountain Serbs", mountainous, animal-like, vermin-like, in short, unlike us, not like us, not plain folks like us, but "nationalists", "zealots", "uncivilized", "fanatical", barbaric mountain dwellers not part of the Western enlightened tradition, not part of the West, not part of "enlightened Latin Christendom"(Roman Catholicism).
Would you like to back up your statements with some sources?
+ China. BTW, I love how Turkey is "for" independence - how many kurds want to live in Kurdistan, again?.. Why not give them this chance?Against: Russia, Spain, Romania, Slovakia, Cyprus
Do you know how many Russians live in Latvia? How many Russians live in Estonia? There is only 60% of Latvians in Latvia, only 63% (I think that's the right number) of Estonians in Estonia, the rest is made of Russians in majority. There are cities and whole areas with most of the population of Russians. Now should I tell you what issues are there with their rights? have anybody heard of a "non-citizen" passports? Russians can't express their will of leaving monument in the center of the city, I can't imagine them having independent country from Latvia and Estonia.. But I take it that all you Kosovo supporters will support them after such precedent.NOT being on voting lists, practically NOT being recognized as citizens. A quarter of the population has how many representatives in the parliament?