• Please make sure you are familiar with the forum rules. You can find them here: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/index.php?threads/forum-rules.2334636/

Activision and Blizzard merge to become . . .

Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Oooooooooooooooooooooooo Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Hmmmmmmmmm...

I have a problem with large games companies, because more money should translate into more quality games, which are on the whole just better, because you can devote more man hours to every aspect of their development, and generally have everything done better.

But this very rarely happens. They don't have an interest in doing that because their goal ultimately becomes making themselves larger, or richer. Something which sadly is done by producing the same generic crap we've all seen before because that's what sells the most.
 
Upvote 0
Game production has become very expensive so it's only natural the smaller developers are bought by or team up with the big fishes. Rather Activision than EA I say, leaves more room for competition.
The only small producer that i can think of that is still independent since the early 90s is Novalogic. And they haven't put out anything new for 2 years now.

The game insustry is just that, an industry.
 
Upvote 0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activision

the only games I dont recognize here are those from the early 80s, if those are what you mean then good for you, but I dont think they should count

Pitfall! was a huge success back in the days, I don't think you can grasp how popular it was if you where never in to the early computer games scene back then.

Also that list isn't complete since I don't see titles like Adventures of Rad Gravity and other games that where successful.
Also games like Quake 2 and Quake 3 are successful games so I wouldn't say Activision has always sucked. It is just as much a false statements as saying EA has always sucked (which isn't true either).
 
Upvote 0