• Please make sure you are familiar with the forum rules. You can find them here: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/index.php?threads/forum-rules.2334636/

Interesting Video

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
[3.SA]Koba

[3.SA]Koba

Grizzled Veteran
Sep 20, 2006
578
66
Dallas, TX
www.3rdshock.org
#1
This is an interesting video which someone sent me over xfire today. - http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/index.html

It goes over the following topics ...

astrological allegory in religion

central banking and its political ramifications

financial interests behind the major wars of the 20th century

the Real ID Act

the North American Union

and television's effect on collective consciousness


It's a full length film, so you can watch it in parts. The first 7 minutes and 45 seconds is an intro and can be skipped.

Warning: Part I regarding the astrological allegory in recurring themes thru ought the major religions may be distasteful to people of faith.


enjoy.
 
Last edited:
#5
Thought the religion part was really interesting, gotta hate those religous (fanatical) b******* out there, eat that! (*puts on flame proof suit*). For those more interested in the 9/11 part should check out a film called Loose Change, i think it's second or maybe even third edition...

Bankers running the world (more or less)... skeptical
 
Upvote 0
#7
It is very apparently unfortunate to me to know that while I am pretty shocked, and appalled at what has been viewed, nothing will change. It hurts to think about it, it hurts to know that I can't do anything about it. Even something as powerful as this, will not stir people enough to think. We have been regressed into a state in which we do think we are powerless, and even if we are aware of this, we accept it. Why do we accept it... this is in inherently obvious to me in that I do not want to hurt myself, or my loved ones. It's like being psychologically bound into a state in which you know you want to break free of, but you see your captor grinning, and pointing over to a scene taking place just next to you, your family. As I have noted previously, it is painful to know that I will not do anything about it, painful to accept it, and most of all, painful to die with such regret.
 
Upvote 0
#11
hmmm. when you mix facts wildly together and bring them in a new shape, you can nearly tell and proof everything. but the film has several false facts about the acient gods of egypt.

also it is still annoying so hear theroies about the WTC beeing blasted with bombs. those theorie makers should talk to an guy that blast houses.... total bull****.

here is an interesting video for all the pleople saying: "why are there no luggage, seats of engines of the plane left that crashed in the pentagon"

F4 Phantom vs. concrete wall at 800kph:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Zl0MhOdkREQ

pulverised
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
#13
D.a.L-UnteroffizierG said:
here is an interesting video for all the pleople saying: "why are there no luggage, seats of engines of the plane left that crashed in the pentagon"

F4 Phantom vs. concrete wall at 800kph:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Zl0MhOdkREQ

pulverised
Click to expand...

The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom is a 2 seat plane. The Boeing 757-223 is a 280 seat plane. That's a whole different ball game.

Not to mention, you're citing a collision with the type of wall that's used to house nuclear reactors not office buildings. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
#15
[3.SA]Koba said:
The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom is a 2 seat plane. The Boeing 757-223 is a 280 seat plane. That's a whole different ball game.

Not to mention, you're citing a collision with the type of wall that's used to house nuclear reactors not office buildings. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Things which weren't obliterated in the initial impact might have been burned in the fireball and then grinded to very tiny bits in the collapse. Not findig parts of the plane, or not being able to discern parts of the plane from the rubble, makes complete sense to me.

EDIT: sorry, didn't realise you meat the pentagon, and not the WTC.

Without having seen the video in first post, I might refer to that hot sexy chicks link in my signature ;)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
#16
[3.SA]Koba said:
The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom is a 2 seat plane. The Boeing 757-223 is a 280 seat plane. That's a whole different ball game.

Not to mention, you're citing a collision with the type of wall that's used to house nuclear reactors not office buildings. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

yes its a different ball game. a boing 757-223 has a weight of 176,650 lb while a F4 has 30,328 lb.


BUT: a larger airplane does not mean it would survive such a crash because of physics (E = mc2):

a 757 with 800 kph has more impact energy than a f4 . so a larger plane would be even at a slower speed completly destroyed. and about the walls of the pentagon: i know american buildings are normaly build with wood and plastic. but the pentagon is build of solid concrete.

also a cruise missile explodes in a different way than seen on the pentagon video. it dont explodes in a huge hollywood fireball:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=19XXTArAGaM&mode=related&search=
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
#20
It angers me when people keep perpetuating these 'conspiracy theories'. They are playing right into the hands of the Powers That Be, distracting everyone from the *real* issues that are right beneath people's noses.

Poverty, inequality, unjust wars, terrorism, massive overconsumption in the west, pollution. Not some obscure theory that bankers are ruling the world secretly. Plus, when you dig a bit deeper into these theories theres always the jews who are 'behind it';
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

Century of The Self is a very good documentary however.

-S
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back
Jump to latest Follow Reply
Jump to latest Follow Reply
Community News
Forums
Merch
Menu