You can only speak for your self unless, of course, you are a psychic?
You forgot a second possibility: Maybe I have been around here long enough so I have seen the exact same discussion multiple times and participated a lot in them and the consens always was that we don't want to have warcrimes in a game. It took a few pages for the sickos to realize it but eventuelly they got it and if not they at least accepted the fact that we will thankfully never ever see that kind of stuff in the game.
And if there really is no difference between killing a child and an adult, why is there a difference between having sex with 'em?
Because they can't decide for themselves. They are too easy to manipulate. Just watch your beloved "Der Untergang" to see how blind that dumb kid is.
The problem isn't to kill them (self-defense), but to even deploy them as soldiers in a warzone. That's a warcrime and we don't want warcrimes in RO.
Of course warcrimes happened. WW2 was chockfull of them. But that's not what I want to see in my game.
Tell me how the gameplay would benefit from having to kill children?
I can't see a single benefit that would justify the effort to put them in.
So I guess its all about historical accuracy, right?
If so, why don't you suggest concentration camps, mass rapes and hangings? They were part of the war too.
What about a mission where you have to get some more jews into a gas chamber because russians are about to attack soon and you want to get the most out of your deathcamp?
What about a mission where you have to hunt down unarmed civilians (played by players) and hang them all within a time limit?
What about a mission were you have to rape all the women of a village while your teammates force their families to watch? Maybe even have a raping minigame?
And don't call me sick, because all of that happened back then!
If you would REALLY care for historical accuracy and if you would REALLY care about NOT painting a pink flower picture of war, then you must want all these things in the game too.
No?