ad. 1. If you plan to use Windows soley (!!!) for games then I'd install Linux on the 300 GB if 80GB is enough for your games.
ad. 2. I'd install Windows first. Many distros recognise that Windows is installed and then you can boot easily the OS of your choice.
ad. 3. around 2 minutes I'd say.
Ok, Windows first. I've read elsewhere too, so I guess that is the "official" way to go?
Anyway, I'm not going to use Windows solely for games. Basically, it's like this: Linux for internet, music, work etc, and Windows for games, but also internet / music (though less than Linux... so Linux will still be my main OS for internet / music).
I just don't get why I should install Linux on the bigger HD, considering games take up so much more space. Does Linux require so much HD space, or something?
Thanks for the answers, much appreciated.
EDIT: another question, is using Linux really, absolutely 100% a guarantee against never getting spyware / virus?
Vista is becoming ana| retentive like a Mac.
[ ] You never used a Mac.Thats because it basically is a Mac now.. sad innit?
[ ] You never used a Mac.
[ ] You haven't got a clue.
Please make a cross where appropriate.
funny shizzle...sad but funny. the beauty with any linux os is that if you have troubles there are lots of people and places to go for free help. ask a question and you will have a quick responce. M$ forces companies like DELL, gateway, MDG and others to use only M$ OS. they do this by selling the company low cost OS.they do this under the pretense that if that company ever sells anything other than M$ OS in thier boxes, they will then pay full price for any M$ products from then on. If the companies dont comply they are forced to buy M$ OS at full price, pricing thier boxes out of the market. in turn putting them out of buisness. another thing ive heard throught the grape vine: M$ will be putting out the new direct x for vista only. not sure if this is true, but sounds like the type of hardball M$ plays.XP for life!
Thats because it basically is a Mac now.. sad innit?
Gates seems determined to make an OS-X for Grandma, where everything is done by "helpfull" guides and files will be organized in pre-made folders named "My-XXXXX", whereas us gamers and computer litterate people will be sitting there, cluthing our mice so hard our knuckles turn white, trying to fight the urge to give the screen an uppercut and scream obscenities till we pass out from exhaustion!
Now with parental control! woohoo! more bloatware that doesen't actually work, and is probably a pain to disable.. if it even can be..
I also have messed with OSX, and with Vista. Vista's parental controls are only enabled when not running on an administrator account (guest accounts are NOT default, you have to set them that way for kids, etc.). The only thing annoying isn't that bad at all, and is the UAC. It is disabled just as easily as Windows Firewall in XP SP2, through the security window.
Insults ftw! Nice reply btw, I'm glad that my counter-points to everything you said have left you with no worthy arguments except "lol whatever".
[ ] You never used Vista.
[ ] You haven't got a clue.
Please place an X where appropriate.