Another question, are you guys making a new game?
- Thread starter angelangel
- Start date
Sherman VS Tiger...
lol... I think the PTRD realistically has better chances of disabling a tiger....
Freaking crap shermans... the Tiger round would go THRU the entire Sherman tank... hell... I bet the king tiger shot can go thru a few shermans...
Upvote
0
Before you even start, buy yourself a copy of Company of Heroes, take a leaf out of those game designers. Even the bots are intelligent and learn, not like the ones in Red Orchestra who attack a tank with a pistol!
Upvote
0
Hello Inkblot. Nice to see you here.
Anyways, I would rather have the devs concentrate on multiplayer sechsniness than practice-mode.
Anyways, I would rather have the devs concentrate on multiplayer sechsniness than practice-mode.
Upvote
0
The multiplay side of Company of Heroes is far outstanding to any other game that I've ever played in. My only wish that it would play on my new PC, as for some unknown reason it doesn't like my new system. It appears not to like my dual-core 4800+ using 2gig of ram and ATI's X1950XTX 512mb graphics card. 
Upvote
0
Well I mean, the tanks are not really realistic are they, in RO game they will not even drive through a wooden fence or knock a small tree down. The game designers left a lot of real detail out in my opinion in RO.
Upvote
0
Those are engine limitations.
I guess the bots are an issue for players who never knew the mod when there were no bots. I've never used them, and only occasionally bump into them online.
I guess the bots are an issue for players who never knew the mod when there were no bots. I've never used them, and only occasionally bump into them online.
Upvote
0
The choice of not having destroyable fences is kind of a trade-off, really. Imagine that every fence and tree on something like Bondarevo was a destroyable mesh. That means that the server would have to continuously be telling 32 people the condition of 100-some fences and several hundred trees (just guesses at figures here). That is a helluva lot of server lag coming up (OK, I know I exaggerate slightly how it does it but the point is that there would be waaaay too many network relevant actors).
That is not the fault of TW, nor is it especially the fault of Unreal Engine, which, generally speaking, has the least laggy performance of any fps engine due to its net-code. It just is that way.
Upvote
0
You have gone to the furthest extreme when I was merely referring to the fact that if tanks in a game were to be realistic, then it should be able to drive through a wooden fence, brick wall, knock over a tree, or even drive through a house. This facility is available in other games, so why not make RO more realistic, never mind about the trade off.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Personally I'd prefer to play a game that is realistic and believeable than one that isn't, but that's purely my own opinion.
Upvote
0
Next game should be usa vs japan that would be great game. Time to get the greatest power of all time in this game USA.
Lmao?
At the time, America was not the strongest nation...they used some pretty outdated tactics, and the tanks, etc. were pretty crappy. The one thing the US had going for it was the assembly line (other nations did not adopt this yet) which let the US crank out lots of equipment really really fast...But still, the US was not the strongest nation at the time. Germany and argueably Russia were a lot stronger..
and the US is not even close to being the most powerful nation as all time. I'd say there were quite a couple that were more powerful, such as Rome (for its time).
Albeit the US is the most powerful nation in the present-day
Upvote
0
Wrong my friend, I play it on my old machine which I do at every opportunity!The point is, you couldn't play it
Last edited:
Upvote
0
O RLY? Did Rome have a presence in every corner of the globe? Could Rome project its power and enforce its will anywhere on the planet in a matter of days? Did the economy of the entire world depend on Rome? Could Rome defeat every other power on Earth... combined?
I didn't think so.
Upvote
0
Company of Heroes is unrealistic arcade it has no place on this forum cuz its sux
Upvote
0
A little bit of hyberbole perhaps? Honestly, American economic hegemony is being increasingly contested by China and the EU (though the EU is still has alot of kinks to work out). If China ever went off the US dollar standard, our economy would be totally screwed. True we can 'project' our power anywhere at anytime, thanks to the wonder of carrier fleets, but 'enforcing' is an entirley different matter.
As for defeating any power on Earth combined, you sir, live in a dream world. We can barely keep Iraq and Afghanistan under control, war with China would be disasterous, etc. Not to mention we would be absolutely economically isolated, when we already have the largest trade deficit in the world, and its growing.
And in WWII, we were NOT the most powerful country, Russia was, and Germany, honestly, never had the manpower or resources to achieve any of its expansionist aims. The only sphere of influence where America was superior was naval, and even that was in question until the defeat of the Japanese at Midway.
So lets turn down the jingoism. Alienating friends and making enemies is what the Reich did, its not what we should do.
Upvote
0
Company of Heroes is very very unrealistic, but its a good game in its own right, heres some unrealistic things:
1.A G43 is more accurate than any other rifle.
2.Soldier's don't need to reload.
3.2 Shermans can own a tiger.
4.Smokes are basicly energy sheilds in disguise.
1.A G43 is more accurate than any other rifle.
2.Soldier's don't need to reload.
3.2 Shermans can own a tiger.
4.Smokes are basicly energy sheilds in disguise.
Upvote
0
The original point I was attempting to make was that tanks in RO are not able to drive through a wooden fence or knock down a tree, that they were unrealistic in that sense.
Upvote
0