Jeeze, I swear some of you have no faith in Tripwire.
Just because there are a few (and some serious) problems with the BA-64 doesn't mean it going to happen again, especially on an entirely different vehicle.
Sometimes I read these threads, and many of them have very good ideas, but all it takes is one person to post "OMG, its a new Cl0wn Car!!!" and everyone starts piling the thread with how bad this vehicle would be when all they are really talking about is the BA and not the suggestion.
Besides, how can you even assume the Aerosan (or any of the other good infantry vehicle suggestions) would even compare to the BA when the vehicle doesn't even exist in the game. You do realise that they are suggesting the vehicle because of the fact that it isn't there.
Just give us all a break, the BA is a lot of trouble I wont deny that, but quit associating it with entirely different vehicles that dont exist in RO yet, and quit assuming Tripwires going to make the same mistake again, they allready realize whats wrong with the BA and they are working on it, its unlikely their going to cause the same problem with another vehicle after what theyve seen allready.
Now if you all would quit screaming "OMG Cl0wn Car!!!" this thread would have a better chance for some decent argumant/counter-argument so its inclusion can be seriously discussed.
I encourage anybody who wishes to seriously discuss this thread to please post your opinon, weather you agree or disagree doesn't matter, as long as you want to seriously discuss it.