I thought it was funny in Doom 3 with all the 'zomg super laser plasma hand held minigun BFG woop woop' there was still an 8 shot pump action shotgun, lol.
Upvote
0
Which brings us to another important question:
Why do lasers sound "pfieuw pfieuw" in computer games and movies. At uni I have been close to a laser that was strong enough to burn trough a humans skin and it didn't sound anything at all (except for the cooling fans, but they give more of a constant humming noise like a air cooled computer (no surprise since the fans are the same as in an computer))?
and why do I hear the explosions and lasers in star wars?!?! there is no sound in space!!!11
and why do I hear the explosions and lasers in star wars?!?! there is no sound in space!!!11
Yeah, Deus Ex's shotgun was pretty impressive, but I preferred the assault rifle: silencer ftw
Except in space, where they'd take a seconds to minutes to reach their target unless they're very close(within a few lightseconds). Even still, lasers at space combat distances wouldn't be very powerful and its more likely missles would be used far more often.plus you would never see a laser "fly" to a target. As soon as the trigger was pulled it would be at the target. The "laser" beams you see in starwars etc would have to be something like ion beams or similar. (omg stop me doing a physcis degree now!!)
The only reasons why bullets are still used in futuristic games is simple: bullets > lasers gameplay wise.
Its cooler to load a new magazine instead of a power cell, its nicer to hear 'dadadadada' instead of 'pfieuw pfieuw',...
And shotguns are one of my favorites, simply because I like my combat close, personal and bloody.
The humble bullet is not going anywhere anytime soon.
Actually lasers would be great as anti-infantry weapons when mounted on vehicles or fixed positions as a replacement for machineguns, it'd be just as effective and far cheaper. They cauterize the wounds and there's no chance of a ricocheting glancing shot.Lasers woulden't make very good infantry weapons, bullets are so effective because they are brutal, they tumble, fragment, tear, and then theres the shockwave, they cause some very nasty wounds, that, even if not fatally hit, can kill by bloodloss or infection, not to mention leaking toxins from your own body into your bloodstream.
A powerful laser on the other hand, would burn a nice clean hole through someone, and quite posibly also burn the edges of the wound preventing any serious bleeding or infection.. its just not the brutal killer a chunk of speeding metal is.
To get a laser anywhere that lethal, it would have to be a massive and very powerfull thing, but then, even if you could carry it, it could not be opperated safely, a real "collateral damage" problem would arrise from massive over penetration.
The humble bullet is not going anywhere anytime soon.
....in addition to an explosive tip....
What the Baikal?Well H&D2 is a bad game because there is a hunting shotgun in one shack in one of the Czech missions
(courtesy of few random RO players in one random server)
It was a common hunting rifle in Eastern Europe. >_>
Why shouldn't it be in H&D2?
Except in space, where they'd take a seconds to minutes to reach their target unless they're very close(within a few lightseconds). Even still, lasers at space combat distances wouldn't be very powerful and its more likely missles would be used far more often.
If it had legs it would be called "x leg" which doesnWhy does the X wing in starwars have wings?
Why does the X wing in starwars have wings?