[Game] The Armed Assault thread
- Thread starter Ghad
- Start date
Upvote
0
Ok. That would be something thatI think ArmA is supposed to support at least 64 players(slow server) and 100 in high-end servers. Possibly 150 in an uberserver from next year?
. Obviously I am not going to graduate ever. Thanks to ROOST and ArmA (if they havent totally screwed up, and I dont believe in that) and lack of self discipline. Maybe just have to change my major from history to psychology and research all the damage computer games can do to you. ROOST should be mentioned to be highly addictive. Game should have somekind of warnings. Maybe like cigarett boxes. "ROOST can cause serious problems in your real life" "Contact your doctor to get help ending your playing"
Upvote
0
New official trailer - http://www.armedassault.org/web2/downloads/pafiledb.php?action=file&id=9
I want it now.
I want it now.
Upvote
0
It does look good, I luved OFP.
Just hope its not another BF2 grab a vehicle rambo fest where you have to fire a whole clip into a guy to kill him bollox.
Just hope its not another BF2 grab a vehicle rambo fest where you have to fire a whole clip into a guy to kill him bollox.
Upvote
0
LOL what? If you played OFP why would you think that?
It's the most realistic infantry sim-game ever made, and I haven't even played it yet.
Upvote
0
Oh, you guys better read this one, lots of my doubts and questions about the game being answerd there
http://www.ga.com.ba/clanak/514.html
And a resynced version of the trailer is here:
http://www.armedassault.eu/downloads.php?cat_id=2&download_id=16
http://www.ga.com.ba/clanak/514.html
And a resynced version of the trailer is here:
http://www.armedassault.eu/downloads.php?cat_id=2&download_id=16
Upvote
0
CTI with 64-100 people will be INSANE!!!!! Hopefully most people playing arn't noobs and they will listen to the commander
Upvote
0
Lumberg voice (Office Space):
"Yeeeeaaaah... Can I have ArmA now plz?.... Greeeeeeeaaaaaaatttttt"
Me wants the preciouses.
"Yeeeeaaaah... Can I have ArmA now plz?.... Greeeeeeeaaaaaaatttttt"
Me wants the preciouses.
Upvote
0
Supposedly there is no limit as to how many people (ai included) you can put in a mission.
Anyone else looking forward to crashing their computer?
I'm going to put up about 1,000 civies and give me a mg and see how many I can kill with one mag! Or I'll put a bunch in a city and bomb the city and see how many get crushed from falling debris!
Anyone else looking forward to crashing their computer?
I'm going to put up about 1,000 civies and give me a mg and see how many I can kill with one mag! Or I'll put a bunch in a city and bomb the city and see how many get crushed from falling debris!
Upvote
0
lol
I didn't like OFP for many reasons. poor implementation of tanks. armour was poorly modelled (hit points based
) and physics (shell lands where exactly where you hit so no need for fire control system... at least firing smalls arms was more difficult because it takes account elevation) and gun stabilization was same for every tank even thouogh T-54/55 was mechanical and T-80 I think was electric (at least on one axis) and absence of any kind of artillery (this is inimaginable in modern conventional warfare...), AI crew was very poor so you often find yourself driving, loading, aiming, firing, giving orders to nearby units, etc., missions were very cheesy, especiialy in Resistance.. game was poorly researched.. according to OFP Carl Gustav is not a RCL but a saclos atgm lol. inability to join during middle of game (this often made MP games irritating because 10 minutes in the game everyone quit) because of this there was more waiting than playing.
Last edited:
Upvote
0