What a stupid thread.
Also, there is no way to just say "I get this FPS". It fluctuates wildly depending on how many players are in the game, what area of the map you're in, how much combat is going on, artillery, etc.
I have an i5 750 @ 3.2 GHz, 4GB DDR3 1333 MHz and a GTX 570, but the performance is definitely a lot lower that it should be, it's in the 30s and 40s far too often. That's not even on max settings.
Vista x64
Intel core 2 quad @ 2,83
ATI Radeon HD4850 512mb
6 Gb RAM
~25-30 fps on ultra on 64 player servers. ~40-45 usual.
E8400 @ 3.6
4 gb ram
5850 1gb
20-25 fps avg, at medium on 32 player servers.
Please be trolling, oh sweet lord, please.
GeForce GTX 260 Graphics Card 5 years ago?
Gtx 570 <-- 350$ video card.
I dont know if you're trolling, or are too stupid to have actually read the performance criticisms, but there are people complaining about RO2s performance who have incredible systems that still can't handle it. There are also others with mid range systems who have absolutely no performance issues. So grow up and stop the "Your PC just sucks" comments, because it's obvious that that is not a problem as simple as people not having machines powerful enough, and jsut because you have no problems, does not mean there may be an underlying issue with performance.
Like the OP, my computer runs it perfect as well.. I just wish it did for everyone else so they would shut the hell up about it.
Friggin noobs quit trying to run RO2 on ultra with your toaster.
Like the OP, my computer runs it perfect as well.. I just wish it did for everyone else so they would shut the hell up about it.
Friggin noobs quit trying to run RO2 on ultra with your toaster.