The MP40 is just fine, IMHO, but they nerfed the PPSh by adding tons of recoil to it.
It's really not, it has no recoil at all, and it is far to accurate at far to long ranges.
"Ohh but Grobut! We just saw a video of a guy shooting one and the barrel barely climbed!"
Yup, and that's because the guy shooting it is bracing against the recoil, in essence, he's pulling down on the gun with his left arm as he fires it, counteracting the recoil.
And all the auto-guns in HoS try to simulate this, IE you have to pull a bit down on the mouse as you fire to keep it on target, except the MP-40, where there is zero recoil..
That just shoulden't be, there should be recoil, it should not be as bad as it was in Ost, god no, but there should be recoil.
If you are going to simulate the need to brace on the PPSh, then the MP-40 should simulate it too.
"What do you mean the accuracy isen't right Grobut? I read on Wikipedia that the MP-40 has an effective range of 100 meters!"
Yup, but effective-range does not equal accuracy, the effective-range is the maximum range at which the round can still be considdered lethal, but for anything past that range, performance can not be garuenteed.
The 9x19mm round does not have great long range accuracy, it's power, weight, shape, none of it is ment for long range accuracy, and even the modern H&K MP5 series SMG's, which have better accuracy than the MP-40 did, cannot snipe at 100 meters.
Also, the MP-40 fires from the open bolt position, and that is bad news for accuracy, as it means the bolt will slam into the battery just prior to fiering, and the impact of that is likely to thow off your aim a bit just as the gun fires.
Of course, the drawbacks is that the smaller bullet size leads to less weight per projectile than the 9x19 round, which would lead to less "stopping power", but the velocity advantage is a good thing for the particular round.
Actually, that's not entirely accurate, as the 7.62x25 tends to yaw as it penetrates the target, whereas the 9x19 tends to just punch straight through. This means that both rounds actually tend to leave a similar size wound profile, so the difference in "stopping power" is very minor between the two, enough to be statistically unimportant.
The MP 40 was used by the british rather than the sten, it wrecked havoc at Arnhem and before dunkirk performed good accuracy in taking out the riflemen.... It was one of the best SMG's along with the Thompson
That's not really accurate, the Germans LOVED the PPSh, and it was not uncommon for them to use it, instead of their MP-40 any chance they got, the Germans even build their own, they made a direct copy of the PPSh rechambered to 9x19mm and using MP-40 magazines.
And infact, it is the PPSh that is considdered the more accurate gun of the two (not that it had great accuracy, it's still an open-bolt SMG), the 7.62x25mm had better flight charecteristics at ranges, and a longer effective-range aswell.
So in conclusion:
PPSh needs a bit less recoil, and better accuracy.
MP-40 needs to have recoil, and worse accuracy.
They should both be about equally controllable (but actually require you to pull a bit down on your mouse to do so), and none of them should be able to snipe with precision at 100m, at that range we should be talking about groupings, not perfect bullseye hits.