1 of 3 < >

Upcoming Forum Overhaul

We are starting the work to switch our forums, which have been based on a version of the Vbulletin forum software since their inception with the Red Orchestra mod (then VB 3 and currently VB 5.1) to an all new forum software called Xenforo. After researching it, we feel Xenforo is a better choice for the future as it has a vibrant modding and addon community that will allow us to extend the functions of these forums in ways players will enjoy.

As part of this, at some point in the near future these forums will be locked down so we cant merge over all of the existing content into the new forum database. It will likely then be a few more days as we work on the new forum and correct any issues from the merge.
2 of 3 < >

Privay Policy Update

We’ve updated the Tripwire Privacy Notice under our Policies to be clearer about our use of customer information to come in line with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) rules that come into force today (25th May 2018). The following are highlights of our changes:

We’ve incorporated the relevant concepts from the GDPR including joining the EU and Swiss Privacy Shield framework. We’ve added explanations for why and how Tripwire processes customer data and the types of data that we process, as well as information about your data protection rights.

For more information about our privacy practices, please review the new Privacy Policy found here:
3 of 3 < >

Forum Rules

  • Items changed, or highlighted for future attention, on 20 July 2013 are highlighted in yellow.

Global Rules
  • Forum moderators may or may not be Tripwire Interactive staff members, but either way, please respect them, as they are the authority of the forums. Speaking to them with intentional spite will not be tolerated and may result in the loss of your forum privileges.
  • Any decisions made by any member of staff or moderator are final and not subject to discussion. Doing so may result in a ban from the site. The owners of Tripwire Interactive Forums reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason, as well as to remove access to the forums for any individuals with or without warning for breaches of the rules.
  • If you have a complaint regarding another user, PM the appropriate moderators, or if you have an administrative issue, [RO]schneidzekk.

General Behaviour
  • Use the search function before posting. Chances are your question has already been answered.
  • Use a title that describes the content of your post. Don't use all caps or special characters to draw attention either in the title or the body of the post.
  • Up to 10 emoticons are allowed in a post
  • Political discussions are prohibited.
  • Flaming - We do not tolerate abusive, malicious, personal attacks. You will be banned if you persist in this behavior.
  • Trolls - Anyone deliberately antagonizing other forum users by posting 'flame bait' type messages is not welcome. You will be banned (possibly without warning depending on the severity of the issue) if you persist in this behavior.
  • Personal insults (directed at anyone) will result in a ban. If the behavior is not corrected, it will be made more permanent.
  • Constructive criticism is welcome. However keep in mind we (and other forums goers) may not agree with you. If you can't keep the conversation civil, you will be removed from the forums.
  • The use of hyperbole, one liners, and images as part of a forum debate is likely to get you infracted. You have many ways to participate and be a constructive part of this community, even when you disagree.
  • To make the highlighted bits above 100% clear to everyone, the following WILL NOT BE TOLERATED:
    1. Personal attacks, insults, antagonism of any forum-goers, moderators or Tripwire Interactive staff.
    2. Name Shaming and Public "Witch Hunts" are also not allowed.
    3. Breaches of confidentiality and privacy of any sort.
    4. Any form of racism, bigotry or attacks on race, creed or color.
    5. Linking to posts on other forums related to ANY of the above, whether you are the originator or not, without exception.[/COLOR]
  • There has been too much in the way of abhorrent personal behaviors in the past. These will cease. It doesn't matter who started it or who reacted to it - it will all result in moderator action. If you have to indulge your hatreds, for whatever reason, go do it elsewhere - and do not try and drag our forum-goers over to enjoy your hatreds.
  • We understand that people have strong feelings about our games, what we do for a living and how we respond (or don't) to comments on the forums. We all aren't going to agree about everything. So, BE CIVIL in your disagreements!

  • DO NOT Transmit any message, information, data, text, software or graphic files, or other materials ("Content") that is unlawful (including illegal drug usage), harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful or racially, ethnically, sexually or otherwise objectionable. This includes publicizing private information, such as individual's real names, IP addresses and anything else that might be used to identify them to the freakier members of the internet. This also means you may NOT publically share private communications (PM, email or anything else) without the original poster's permission.
  • DO NOT Post or transmit any Content that contains a virus, Trojan horse or other mischievous Content.
  • DO NOT Post or transmit any unsolicited advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail", "spam", "chain letters", "pyramid schemes" or any other form of solicitation.
  • DO NOT link to posts on any other forums, or any other form of media, that breaches our rules. It will be treated just the same as if you had posted it here.
  • DO NOT Double Post, cross Post, "necro post" or restart closed threads.
  • DO NOT Intentionally or unintentionally violate any applicable local, state, national or international law, rule or regulation.
  • DO NOT Upload or transmit any Content that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights ("Rights") of any party.
  • DO NOT complain about being banned from a server and DO NOT complain about other players on servers - that is between you and the admin, no need to get the community involved.

Username, Avatar and Signature Rules
  • Multiple registrations result in a ban.
  • No offensive user names
  • Avatars:
    Avatars are disabled.
  • All signatures should not exceed the following size limits, you can have both text and images
  • - For text signatures: 4 lines normal size, 8 lines small size and up to 100 chars per line. Font sizes above 2 are not allowed. (Blank lines count as lines.)
  • - For images in signatures: 1 image up to 400 pixels wide, 150 pixels tall and 100kb in size plus 2 lines normal size text and up to 100 chars per line
Netiquette: Written text has no inflection, and, as such, you should be careful how you write your messages as interpretation will vary from person to person. Please take advantage of the built-in emoticons to add such expression to your words. Please remember the golden rule: to treat other forum users the way you would like to be treated. Please use common courtesy, and enjoy using Red Orchestra's forums
[COLOR=darkred]Offensive material
The following is a list of some things that MAY be considered "offensive" by the moderators and the team. This is NOT an exclusive list and it does depend very much on context.

Crossing the line into "offensive" territory is likely to get you asked to change your name, sig or avatar or to withdraw/delete posts. This will be done politely by the moderators. If you refuse to comply further action WILL be taken once started, ultimately leading to banning from the forums.

A key point: please attempt to use your brains. What is mild humour to you may well be deeply offensive to others. While we have no intention of acting as politically-correct "thought police", we are on the lookout for those things that can cause offense and, in some cases, are actually still illegal in some jurisdictions.
  1. Names recalling notorious war criminals or personalities.
  2. Names recalling atrocities and war crimes in general, or units with particularly odious histories.
  3. Use of obscenities and expletives.
  4. Blatant racism, mysogynism or many other "ism"s.
  5. Use of symbolism and regalia recalling Nazism or Fascism; this does not include pics of soldiers who happen to have such symbols on their uniform, unless we feel this has been done to provoke. Please note that many Nazi symbols (including the Swastika) are still illegal in Germany and other countries and considered deeply offensive by many Europeans.
  6. Use of symbolism and regalia recalling Stalinism.
  7. On both the previous two, the moderators' views on the intention and impact of use of such symbols will be final - not yours. Please be understanding if you are advised to change something.
  8. In general, if a sig/avatar represents your allegiances in-game and is clearly "in part", it is likely to be fine; if the moderators feel you are trying to demonstrate unpalatable political allegiances, or to use it in an attempt to ridicule or provoke others you WILL be asked to change it. RO is NOT the place to make any extremist political statements of any kind.

So people get the idea, some examples that would be considered offensive, numbered as above:
  1. "Hitler", "Beria"
  2. "NKVD Blocking Detachment", "Einsatzgruppen"
  3. This one should be pretty obvious...
  4. So should this - and it includes calling all Germans "Nazis" and all Soviets/Russians "Commies". It got boring 50 years ago, so stop it.
  5. Use of swastikas, fasces, SS-runes and so on for the Axis.
  6. There is actually very little overt symbolism from the Stalinist era; the hammer-and-sickle isn't offensive per se.

A simple rule-of-thumb: many Europeans find Nazi symbolism of any sort offensive; many Americans still find Soviet symbolism offensive. Engage your brain before using.

Final Note: this is NOT open to debate, so please do NOT start whining and moaning if a moderator asks you to change something. They will advise at first, giving reasons, then, if you take no notice, they will step up the pressure through to banning.
See more
See less

Consistant map balance issues.

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Consistant map balance issues.

    A number of the new maps have significant balance issues. Leading to one team winning most of the time. In some cases almost all of the time.

    A significant hurdle for the attacking team is the A point. The Single spawn locations means a lot of walking is required for the attacking team to control the flanks. The attackers right flank has had some walls knocked down which allows the defending team to take that ground. They were previously unable to. Artillery is largely useless at even cutting off the cap zone. The only real way to take it is to mass charge the front to gain a foothold. Then rely solely on the ambush spawn mechanic to get everyone on it. Simply hoping that you have more men on the ground floor than the defenders have on the first floor. As there are only 2 ways up to the first floor (there is a 3rd way but that's suicide even trying to get to the ladder on their side). This is all very time consuming and when under constant commander strikes very difficult. The Defenders get a lot of visual cover and are protected from artillery.
    The rest of the map is easy enough (B needs a second spawn locations for the attackers really) until you get to the last 2 cap zones. The only real way to get there is through the tunnels. The tunnels that only appear outside the building at 2 locations. Ladders no less. One of which is easily camped by the defenders. The rear of the building is now out of the combat zone for the attackers. In black April the whole idea was to surround the building. But with this new version the only way in is through the front entrances, the side entrance or mantling some boxes at the back. Once you do get in the attacking team now has to hold both E and F simultaneously. Something I have never seen done at all. Spawns don't move up when you capture E. The attackers at this point are struggling for time. The whole last area needs a big rethink as to how it's done. Almost need to make that T-54 driveable. Only ever seen the attackers win ONCE. Played the map many times. They managed to kill all the defenders reinforcements.

    Tickets have been raised at least. But the hardest parts of this map are A and B. The defenders get a commanding view over the main approach and over the attackers left flank. Leaving only the right flank as the viable approach. This is unlike the original where the defenders didn't have much of a view. Again this relies heavily on the ambush spawn ability of the commander. As it's very hard to get good arty marks because of the way the terrain is.
    Once A is taken B is extremely hard to get to. The combat zones are extremely generous to the defenders as well. It allows them to run around in A still and everywhere in between. They can often push forward and defend from a forward flank. Making it very hard for the attackers to push. The way the terrain is here is again not in the attackers favour.

    Apache Snow
    This map is relatively fine until D and E. It largely becomes a steamroll for the attackers. D and E are very large cap zones which allows the attackers to occupy a small portion of each one to cap. Plus the cap zones extend out to where the defenders can't reasonably get to. The attackers can take these zones without even being seen by the defenders who were also in the zones the entire time. It's more apparent with E.
    F is a similar story now. The defenders usually haven't got themselves in a position to defend F properly.
    The last cap G is easier to defend. But it's by no means a stonewall cap zone. With the 3 previous zones generally falling easily the defenders now have to hold G for a long time. Something not easily done.

    Khe Sanh
    Who's idea was it to give the defenders more tickets than the attackers??? That is the single most bat **** crazy balance decision I've seen. Cos guess what. The attackers keep running out of tickets lol. That aside the majority of Keh Sahn games I've played have ended on C and B. Generally not to a lockdown either. But to the attackers running out of tickets. B and C aren't hard to take. What's hard is holding both of them at the same time. The game turns into a massive flip flop of who's holding either point. Both points are easy to retake by the defenders. Especially C. Both cap zones are very far apart and there is a lot of cover in between each point. Slowing down movement between the two and it allows the defenders and attackers to focus a lot of resources towards the center. Which isn't always beneficial for the attackers even when they got several tunnels in that area. They either need to lock or defenders spawns need to be further away or have a longer spawn time.
    A lot of people complain about the A cap zone as well but it's not too hard if you focus on the trenches. There's multiple trenches to take you to A and a lot of shell craters to hide in as well.
    Past B and C I can't really tell. I've been past it twice. Ran out of tickets once and time the other.

    Da Nang
    This map is largely fine. A and B are slogs but they are both cap zones the attackers will eventually claw their way into. The only real difficult cap zone is F. That thing is a damn fortress and with E still active it's a big pain for the attackers to get past that stage. Maybe another broken sewer line in that area would help. As there isn't really a viable approach to F. People can flank it from the attackers left but that's a loooong flank and takes you across an open road right in front of their spawn.
    The main issue with Dan Nang however is time. 30 minutes is too short. 35 minutes might even been too short. Extending the time (and reinforcements along with it) to between 35-40 minutes will make this map a lot more enjoyable for both sides.

  • #2
    I agree on Da Nang time being too short. Really needs at least 10 more minutes on that one.


    • Threule
      Threule commented
      Editing a comment
      Da Nang doesn't need 10, with just 5+ it does fine

  • #3
    agree with all mentioned.

    Especially head-scratching is Khe Sahn defenders getting 100 more tickets than attackers... on a heavily defender biased map


    • #4
      Agree on all mentioned too. Khe Sanh is the worst issue for me though. People in chat stating it is a 'tactical' map. But try being -so- tactical in random game. So no, way way too hard for attacker. And not fun thus, which is what it should be about. Having no chance feels like 'muhaha' for defender way too much.


      • #5
        For balance we keep an eye on player chatter, our own experience as well as stats sent back from servers. Map balance can change month to month and week to week as players learn and discover new routes and defense points causing things to swing wildly. We try and push out a balance pass to a map when things swing too far out of a range and stay there.
        Pretty, what do we blow up first? - Myn Donos


        • #6
          I feel like its still to early to say if there's a balance issue or not. Khe Sanh for example my first few games went terribly as an attacker, it's slowly gotten better though the more I play it. The team you have really makes the biggest difference. I've noticed it tends to goes best when most of the team hits one flank while a smaller portion infiltrates the other. It is one of the more challenging maps. DMZ seems fine to me play wise (aesthetically I feel like it could use a little something and a bit more cover, but that's no big deal).
          Apache Snow has been a toss up, again depending on the team you have. It can definitely play a little like Kobura where if the attackers build up momentum from the first two sets of objectives it can be over quick.
          I haven't played Saigon or Da Nang enough yet to weigh in on those.

          None of the new maps have any game breaking aspects to them, its not like Resort for example where if the US has no pilots they're 100% doomed.