@Unus Offa, Unus Nex
thinning out the rims are a separate issue entirely. America got out of Vietnam in April, 1975, and I'm lobbying the devs to make a simple change so they don't use weapon sights that came out in 1982. I agree with you that the rear peep sights have a completely unrealistic and unsympathetically useless feel to them right now, despite what Beskar Mando says. But the fact is that the 3D model the devs chose is historically wrong, asynchronistic, is so simple to fix, and it is distinct from your concern.
I have a Colt M16A1 upper receiver literally 3 feet away from me. I've trained with the M16, firing hundreds of rounds at ranges from 20-500 yards, stationary and on the move, and I will say the sight picture is beyond f---'d up as is.
thinning out the rims are a separate issue entirely. America got out of Vietnam in April, 1975, and I'm lobbying the devs to make a simple change so they don't use weapon sights that came out in 1982. I agree with you that the rear peep sights have a completely unrealistic and unsympathetically useless feel to them right now, despite what Beskar Mando says. But the fact is that the 3D model the devs chose is historically wrong, asynchronistic, is so simple to fix, and it is distinct from your concern.
I have a Colt M16A1 upper receiver literally 3 feet away from me. I've trained with the M16, firing hundreds of rounds at ranges from 20-500 yards, stationary and on the move, and I will say the sight picture is beyond f---'d up as is.
Upvote
0