Yoshiro posted on RO2 steamgroup something like this:
That tweet says:
and link leads us to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lahti_L-39
That tweet says:
and link leads us to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lahti_L-39
New AT rifle confirmed?
- Thread starter Apos
- Start date
I don't know. Twitter is so confusing and I just can't link one message to another to understand what they are trying to say 
Upvote
0
I don't know. Twitter is so confusing and I just can't link one message to another to understand what they are trying to say
This
Upvote
0
so how did he learn that said rifle with his last name exists? Ramm just goes, oh hey, check out this wiki article i just pulled up on my computer....there's a gun with your same last name. pretty neat huh?
be interesting to see how this weapon will be used. according to the wiki info, it required at least two soldiers to carry, so would this mean a special two-man unit to be anti-tank? or perhaps just one super strong Hero could carry it on his own
Upvote
0
so how did he learn that said rifle with his last name exists? Ramm just goes, oh hey, check out this wiki article i just pulled up on my computer....there's a gun with your same last name. pretty neat huh?
That might be more plausible than seeing a Finnish AT rifle in Stalingrad. But who knows, maybe it'll be for elite AT class, as it seems to be semi-auto.
Upvote
0
![[TW]Ramm-Jaeger](/data/avatars/s/0/2.jpg?1568638684){kind=avatar}
We used a Lahti 20mm to record the sound for the AT Rifle that we're actually featuring. This was due to the real AT Rifle (which had out at the range) malfunctioning on the day we went to do the recording. Thus my conversation with the PC Gamer guy with the same last name
Upvote
0
PTRSwe used a lahti 20mm to record the sound for the at rifle that we're actually featuring. This was due to the real at rifle (which had out at the range) malfunctioning on the day we went to do the recording. Thus my conversation with the pc gamer guy with the same last name
You wouldn't record a semi-auto anti-tank rifle for a bolt action one.
Upvote
0
I hope there isn't much different between the real sound of those riflesWe used a Lahti 20mm to record the sound for the AT Rifle that we're actually featuring. This was due to the real AT Rifle (which had out at the range) malfunctioning on the day we went to do the recording. Thus my conversation with the PC Gamer guy with the same last name
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
OK that's it, I refuse to buy RO:HOS now.I hope there isn't much different between the real sound of those rifles
It's a slippery slope ... first the wrong AT Rifle firing sound, next no more dedicated servers!
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
We used a Lahti 20mm to record the sound for the AT Rifle that we're actually featuring. This was due to the real AT Rifle (which had out at the range) malfunctioning on the day we went to do the recording. Thus my conversation with the PC Gamer guy with the same last name
Actually I would put my money for Solothurn S-18/100 or S-18/1000. Allthough that weapon would most definately need 2-man crew to be usable, so could it be Solothurn afterall...but atleast the sound of Lahti L-39 and Solothurn S-18/1000 would be close, since both had same cartridge. PTRS would on the other hand have probably pretty different sound.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
I'm sure an audio engineer can tweak it to sound more like a PTRS since it used smaller rounds.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
