Upvote
0
What will we see from RO:HoS at GamesCom 2009?
- Thread starter Vakka
- Start date
Originally Posted by [TW]Ramm-Jaeger 
Yes, but a trained soldier (even a poorly trained one), will likely run faster than a video game programmer that sits on their duff all day
[QUOTE=D.a.L-mistk
Yes, but a trained soldier (even a poorly trained one), will likely run faster than a video game programmer that sits on their duff all day
[QUOTE=D.a.L-mistk
Upvote
0
No you will not get footage of things that aren't done yet, or you will pick over it for no good reason... oh wait..
Upvote
0
Thank you Yoshiro, that's what I wanted to know, whether it's final or in the middle of WIP.
Upvote
0
Almost everything is still a WiP. Some things are more final then others, but the point of an alpha means things are subject to change. One thing that makes ROHOS alpha look better is that alot of content from the original RO has been used as a placeholder. If I remember correctly the first content in terms of models in game were ported RO:Ost player models and weapons. This allowed the code team to work with some visuals rather then abstract place holders.
Once you hit beta stage, that is when you are "feature complete" for the most part and are just working on fixes and balance and trying to fill gaps you might feel have come up in systems or gameplay.
Once you hit beta stage, that is when you are "feature complete" for the most part and are just working on fixes and balance and trying to fill gaps you might feel have come up in systems or gameplay.
Upvote
0
I think the graphics turned out better than how they look in the screen shots.
The only big thing that really bugs me is how it kinda seems it zooms in a little when you sprint. It looks very weird. I also didn't like the slight zoom in iron sights.
I also hope the HUD indicator thing can be turned off by the server.
Also:
That lockdown feature I think is a mistake, especially for clan matches.
The only big thing that really bugs me is how it kinda seems it zooms in a little when you sprint. It looks very weird. I also didn't like the slight zoom in iron sights.
I also hope the HUD indicator thing can be turned off by the server.
Also:
That lockdown feature I think is a mistake, especially for clan matches.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
all the dev posts dont take away my worry on the where bullets come from detection circle.
I find it unimmersive and kills gameplay.
I find it unimmersive and kills gameplay.
Upvote
0
Okay Yoshiro gotcha.
So if it's still alpha I don't have to lose faith on 1st person full body awareness, do I?
So if it's still alpha I don't have to lose faith on 1st person full body awareness, do I?
Upvote
0
when rewatching the vid, the zoom does seem extreme. won't that mean that as soon as you expose yourself, you will get sniped instantly by people who seem so far away that you can hardly see them when not zooming at them. does it really need to be made more easy to shoot people, than how it currently is in RO?
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
in reality people you see also dont change their size when you start running or aim at them.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Both of the above posters have good points. The only option now is a fight to the death to determine who is right.
Upvote
0
He's got a point there. One complaint I've had is the ability to whip your weapon around as fast as your mouse - I would think the weight of an MG-34 would slow that down a bit. I wouldn't mind either slowing down the max turn radius per second, or implement "catch-up" for your weapon after your eyes/head snap into place. I wouldn't be surprised if that's already in the pipeline (since as lot of other weapon immersion stuff is in).
Otherwise, looks great, and I think the compromises for better Situational Awareness are necessary and will lead to better gameplay. I also love the fact that the hardcore types can play on stock "realism" servers
Can't wait to see the vehicle stuff!
Congrats TW
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
W said:I myself prefer a static FOV, as i can live more easily with off distances than with nausea inducing FOV changes.
Seconded.
Upvote
0
I myself prefer a static FOV, as i can live more easily with off distances than with nausea inducing FOV changes.
How about this for nausea inducing, when you go to IS, most of the view zooms into a realistic scaling in sort of a bubble in the middle. While the outside view darkens a bit (like a vignette), but compresses the rest of your perepheral view into that small space. That way you can still sense movement.
Sure it'll look alien and probably ugly, but it's one way of dealing with perepheral vision while keepin a realistic view scale.
Upvote
0