Upvote
0
The RO:HoS Fact Thread
- Thread starter Ralfst3r
- Start date
- Status
omg 2 mainweapons...
now im really turned off
cya again when some new gameplay vids showing dual wielding MG42 backflipping nazihunters bunnyhopping and throwing shambeh bambehs all around
i got the same feeling about RO:HoS as i have about OFP2
arcardey gameplay with a "hardcoremode" and devs ensuring the realismcrowd its realistic, but its not
now im really turned off
cya again when some new gameplay vids showing dual wielding MG42 backflipping nazihunters bunnyhopping and throwing shambeh bambehs all around
i got the same feeling about RO:HoS as i have about OFP2
arcardey gameplay with a "hardcoremode" and devs ensuring the realismcrowd its realistic, but its not
Upvote
0
I don't know if your post is entirely sarcastic, but I am somewhat concerned about being able to have two main weapons. If there is a weight system where you can carry two main weapons, does that mean there are still classes? It would be kind of lame if you can have a Mosin Nagant and PPSh at the expense of grenades and more ammo.
Upvote
0
I think having a 2 main weapons shouldnt go beyond grabbing a magazine from the new weapon. As irl where in hell can you put the extra magazine also for gameplay reasons.
Upvote
0
I believe it was stated that you COULD carry two primary weapons at a disadvantage, but you don't START with two weapons. So in other words, you'd have to find one and pick it up (and if your weight was too full as is, you'd have to drop something in its place).
Upvote
0
Run n Gun Vs Dual Carrying Vs Dual Wielding
Run n Gun Vs Dual Carrying Vs Dual Wielding
Im sure most have seen these pics.
http://www.katardat.org/marxuniv/2002-SUWW2/Images/images05-stalingrad.html
There are a few examples of soldiers carrying backpacks etc and Bulky Clothing anything that slows down a Run n Gunner is good, that said if they dropped all their gear , fine. Speed of movement "through" terrain is IMHO important to emulate, not movement "over" terrain.
Nothing wrong with a packhorse(Person) bringing up valuable ammo and weapons, But wielding them and carrying are very different concepts.
And denying weapons to enemy is a valid strategy.
But seeing a person leap from inside a clown car and dropping a charge of some type and instantly gunning down two or three people is not the type of "Hero" i'd like to see in Stalingrad.
Run n Gun Vs Dual Carrying Vs Dual Wielding
Im sure most have seen these pics.
http://www.katardat.org/marxuniv/2002-SUWW2/Images/images05-stalingrad.html
There are a few examples of soldiers carrying backpacks etc and Bulky Clothing anything that slows down a Run n Gunner is good, that said if they dropped all their gear , fine. Speed of movement "through" terrain is IMHO important to emulate, not movement "over" terrain.
Nothing wrong with a packhorse(Person) bringing up valuable ammo and weapons, But wielding them and carrying are very different concepts.
And denying weapons to enemy is a valid strategy.
But seeing a person leap from inside a clown car and dropping a charge of some type and instantly gunning down two or three people is not the type of "Hero" i'd like to see in Stalingrad.
Upvote
0
guys....his quote from the TW devs was all that was needed.
for arguing about the aspects of the ability to carry two primary weapons, there's already 5 pages worth over here:
[URL="http://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/showthread.php?p=487889#post487889"][url]http://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/showthread.php?p=487889#post487889[/URL][/URL]
for arguing about the aspects of the ability to carry two primary weapons, there's already 5 pages worth over here:
[URL="http://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/showthread.php?p=487889#post487889"][url]http://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/showthread.php?p=487889#post487889[/URL][/URL]
Upvote
0
i geuss technically "unconfirmed".....has anyone spotted it in any images/video?
however i'd ASSUME that i'd be in since it was in production and use well before the battle. not every soldier could get their hands on the newer models so it would only make sense soldiers were still carrying the weapon
however i'd ASSUME that i'd be in since it was in production and use well before the battle. not every soldier could get their hands on the newer models so it would only make sense soldiers were still carrying the weapon
Upvote
0
This may not be "fact", but I think we can be pretty sure the T34 tank and Tiger or King Tiger will be in the game... and probably the Panzer IV.
Also, I think TWI mentioned something about a Panzershreck on the HOS website?
Also, I think TWI mentioned something about a Panzershreck on the HOS website?
Upvote
0
Panzer IV is definately in (the question here is: which versions?).
Panzer III, I guess.
......to be continued.
But I doubt they'll put in an armored ogre.
Upvote
0
I haven't seen a single mention of tanks being in so far, so... I think we can expect them in, but as of yet still unconfirmed.
Upvote
0
cause there hasn't been anything....the only thing we know 100% is "vehicles" which is not specifically tanks. everything else is speculation
Upvote
0
I think, that we can be absolutely sure, that there will be no Tiger or Tiger II or Panzerschreck in RO:HoS. Because there weren
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Panzer IV is definately in (the question here is: which versions?).
Panzer III, I guess.
......to be continued.
But I doubt they'll put in an armored ogre.
panzer IV F1 and pazner IV F2
panzer IV G and H were built in 43
panzer III will be also in the party i think
what is a german army wihtout its famous panzers ??
the problem is not hte panzer
it is the sdkfz
axis need more sdkfz !
sdkfz 251
sdkfz 250
sdkfz 221 (mg 34 only )
Upvote
0
that mention has been removed from the official announcement, so i guess its not even 100% confirmed, maybe 90%
and according to CoD:WaW, wich we all know is the non plus ultra in historical accuracy, Stalingrad was littered with Kingtigers
maybe Treyarch found some new evidence?
Upvote
0
- Status