What I love are atheists who think they're representatives of science for some reason.
And then they come up with nonsense like "we carbon dated dinosaur bones so we know they're millions of years old". Yeah, no, would be cool if we could though.
But it's always worth it to listen to some dope explain evolution to you as if it was a conscious process, like some fish decided "hey, I think I should grow a couple of legs so I can walk over there", and they still think this conscious, guided idea of evolution they have concocted from watching simplified-to-a-fault cartoons about science is anything but "intelligent design". Because god didn't create giraffes, that would be stupid, some horse decided "if only I had a longer neck so I could reach up there. Let's wait a couple of hundred generations and see if things improve. [waits] Ah, there we go, guess I'm a giraffe now". You're describing intelligent design too, except you dismiss the notion of a designer and you say "nature" designed it.
Get a clue on how evolution works, please!
Unreflected dismissal of religion just because a majority of the bible isn't factually true annoys me too. "Ololol, god didn't create the earth in six days because there weren't even days then, lol" We know, genius. That's not the point, even if some stupid modern day bible thumper thinks it is.
The idea that religion is just there to explain physical events (i.e. "lightning? Guess the gods are angry!") was already considered stupid when the bible was written and the stories have a point. And it's not to explain how stuff works by repeating "god did it, lol".
The fact that you're still missing the point and you're arguing that "actually, lightning happens because of friction in the..." is only marginally less embarrassing than running around today saying "god did it, lol".
tl;dr stupid atheists and stupid religious people need to accept that they have to respect each-other.
Intelligent people from both camps already know.
And then they come up with nonsense like "we carbon dated dinosaur bones so we know they're millions of years old". Yeah, no, would be cool if we could though.
But it's always worth it to listen to some dope explain evolution to you as if it was a conscious process, like some fish decided "hey, I think I should grow a couple of legs so I can walk over there", and they still think this conscious, guided idea of evolution they have concocted from watching simplified-to-a-fault cartoons about science is anything but "intelligent design". Because god didn't create giraffes, that would be stupid, some horse decided "if only I had a longer neck so I could reach up there. Let's wait a couple of hundred generations and see if things improve. [waits] Ah, there we go, guess I'm a giraffe now". You're describing intelligent design too, except you dismiss the notion of a designer and you say "nature" designed it.
Get a clue on how evolution works, please!
Unreflected dismissal of religion just because a majority of the bible isn't factually true annoys me too. "Ololol, god didn't create the earth in six days because there weren't even days then, lol" We know, genius. That's not the point, even if some stupid modern day bible thumper thinks it is.
The idea that religion is just there to explain physical events (i.e. "lightning? Guess the gods are angry!") was already considered stupid when the bible was written and the stories have a point. And it's not to explain how stuff works by repeating "god did it, lol".
The fact that you're still missing the point and you're arguing that "actually, lightning happens because of friction in the..." is only marginally less embarrassing than running around today saying "god did it, lol".
tl;dr stupid atheists and stupid religious people need to accept that they have to respect each-other.
Intelligent people from both camps already know.
Upvote
0