2. Fallschirmjager Server #2 up

[7.62x54r]

We have started up a second server. So add it to your favorites in case you can't get in the first one : )

Server IP: 208.100.45.112

Za Rodinu!
http://forums.steampowered.com/forum...ser_online.gif http://forums.steampowered.com/forum...reputation.gif http://forums.steampowered.com/forum...ons/report.gif http://cdn.store.steampowered.com/pu...ocial/buzz.gif

[Mormegil]

Awesome.


BTW: What do you have the rules set so 0 vs. 0 reinforcements doesn't always have the defender winning on attrition TE maps (i.e. Sparta), when they still hold territory?

[Nezzer]

You should add te new custom maps to the rotation now that redirect is up

[Yurizle]

Dude 1 server is enough. It's bad as it is that this is the only populated server on with some weird rules like 0v0 tickers on spartanovka victory goes to the wrong team apart from other similar server side rules catering to one side of the team. Also alot of times the "speedhack" is just unberable.

It's a decent server only because its the only server

[Gudenrath]

Originally Posted by Yurizle

Dude 1 server is enough. It's bad as it is that this is the only populated server on with some weird rules like 0v0 tickers on spartanovka victory goes to the wrong team apart from other similar server side rules catering to one side of the team. Also alot of times the "speedhack" is just unberable.

It's a decent server only because its the only server

Talk about ungrateful players.

[Roland Kaul]

Originally Posted by Yurizle

Dude 1 server is enough. It's bad as it is that this is the only populated server on with some weird rules like 0v0 tickers on spartanovka victory goes to the wrong team apart from other similar server side rules catering to one side of the team. Also alot of times the "speedhack" is just unberable.

It's a decent server only because its the only server

Feel free to post the IP of your server.

[Mormegil]

I'm grateful for the server, but I'm still curious why you guys set that particular rule.

[Floyd]

I'm glad someone in the US has a populated server. And I mean absolutely no offense when I say I hope you guys give some thought about dropping the player count down to about 52-60. I think you'd see a marked improvement in performance and never notice there were 4-10 few players. Win/win for all.

Good luck with server #2.

Now quit reading the forums, scan those screenshots, and get those servers streaming to pbbans

[Deadbolt]

should make it four servers of 32 players each instead of 2 at 64. that would be awesome.

[[SM]Fluttershy]

Excellent, I'm glad to see a second server so we can get the server overflow moved here.

[Aurien]

Originally Posted by Floyd

I'm glad someone in the US has a populated server. And I mean absolutely no offense when I say I hope you guys give some thought about dropping the player count down to about 52-60. I think you'd see a marked improvement in performance and never notice there were 4-10 few players. Win/win for all.

Good luck with server #2.

Now quit reading the forums, scan those screenshots, and get those servers streaming to pbbans

Originally Posted by [1BF/1R]Terror

should make it four servers of 32 players each instead of 2 at 64. that would be awesome.

Because some people won't touch servers with less than 64 player max count. 7th Cav's 64 player realism server was usually full and active. Once they dropped their player count I stopped going on their server and now almost every time I see it on the list it's empty.

[Floyd]

Originally Posted by Aurien

Because some people won't touch servers with less than 64 player max count. 7th Cav's 64 player realism server was usually full and active. Once they dropped their player count I stopped going on their server and now almost every time I see it on the list it's empty.

Yeah, and I just dont' understand that player mindset. Its almost impossible to tell the difference of two to five fewer players per side (60 -52 players). Yet, people would rather play on servers that struggle to perform than play a really smooth game. Dropping four players per side makes a world of difference in performance and is neglible with regards to gameplay. The server is less loaded and the clients with lessor machines don't struggle as much either.

I'm not blaming the admins. Though it would be nice if all the admins would get together and agree to hold off on the big numbers till the server (and client) cpu usage is optimized a bit more. But that'll never happen....

[Mr Vain]

Originally Posted by 7.62x54r

We have started up a second server. So add it to your favorites in case you can't get in the first one : )

Server IP: 208.100.45.112

Za Rodinu!
http://forums.steampowered.com/forum...ser_online.gif http://forums.steampowered.com/forum...reputation.gif http://forums.steampowered.com/forum...ons/report.gif http://cdn.store.steampowered.com/pu...ocial/buzz.gif

I wish you all the luck guys !!

[ihatemayo]

I second the 52 man server!!!

[Tummel]

Originally Posted by Mormegil

Awesome.

BTW: What do you have the rules set so 0 vs. 0 reinforcements doesn't always have the defender winning on attrition TE maps (i.e. Sparta), when they still hold territory?

It's a known bug, not a server option.

[Colt .45 killer]

I second the motion to have customs up on #2. Odessa please!

[jackastronaut]

AWESOME. It's my favorite server, and when I do actually have time to play it's always full. THANK YOU.

[Yurizle]

Originally Posted by Tummel

It's a known bug, not a server option.

Never happened on 7th Cav and other servers though. But yeah its really annoying.

[Sensemann]

I too have the hope that your 2nd server will have Butovo and Ogledow on the rotation.
More maps are needed to keep me interested in this game.

[LugNut]

Glad to see another, as your server is normally the ONLY one I see in my browser that isn't full of bots, just actual players. If fact, I can rarely get in, it's always full.