Who said anything about lone sniper? I'm effective by myself, sure, akin to the sniper in the sense that I'm most effective off of objectives, covering flanks and providing fire support. The sniper eliminates high value targets, I handle crowd control.
However, if I can get 1-2 riflemen with me, suddenly, I become an unstoppable menace. I can basically set up anywhere as long as I have some folks covering my back. I handle crowd control and they pick off the stragglers and keep them from shooting me in the back.
I'm effective alone, and I'm super-effective with a group. We don't need any gamey mechanics to kick ***. We dominate the battlefield if we play correctly. As long as we're doing our job, having other people jump in and help by doing their jobs is only going to make us more efficient.
And just look at all the people in this thread that talk about LMGs being used for sustained fire to know what I mean about spraying at cover. You shouldn't ever fire your LMG without there being a good chance of a killshot, or you're just giving away your position to the enemy sharpshooters.
How does any of what you said support your argument that you are using the role how it's meant to be. The germans and the russians NEVER sent their MG out into the middle of no where, where no one could support him quickly if need be, to rack up kills. This is a silly argument and this only prove that TWI is going the way of CoD. NEVER NEVER would they send the CORE of the squad out by himself... especially with no one there.
Proof?
Why in God's name would they fire an MG-42 without the tripod, especially considering that this was a hardened and fortified defensive position that had had several months to establish itself?
Indeed you are wrong sir. I'm sorry but get your facts straight before you start posting stuff on a forum that is ripe with history junkies. You have to remember the length and size of the wall they had build. having 100's and 100's of tri-pods sent over there would be a waste of reasorces considering they were fighting another war on the other side of germany and the war to the west hadnt even started yet. right as you got off the beaches you were met with these scattered in select places: http://i45.servimg.com/u/f45/11/45/98/54/tobruk10.jpg
And here: http://media.photobucket.com/image/normandy MG position/jgfive/Brittany10/Brittany10.jpg
It was so the Germans could dismount and move their MG into another location quickly if need be and pop up in another place. it's also easy to carry 25+lbs plus ammo instead of un-securing the MG and carrying 45+lbs plus ammo. The bunkers were not that of saving private ryan.
The MG's that were facing the beach were dug into the grass, set up with sand bags, had special concrete holes with a wall in front of them, and so on so they had something that block shots from hitting them directly from the beach but allowed them to shoot the length of the beach. This allowed them to utilize the full effective range of the MG-34/42 of 800 meters.
Upvote
0