How much heavier would a gun with 70 rounds be? I'm sure that's what he was implying.
Sure is
Upvote
0
How much heavier would a gun with 70 rounds be? I'm sure that's what he was implying.
I think a better decision would be to nerf/remove/incinerate the mkb42 rather than buff the ppsh
I think a better decision would be to nerf/remove/incinerate the mkb42 rather than buff the ppsh
However I do agree with your other point that perhaps the PPSh recoil, and heck maybe even MG34/DP28, should go down a bit. Say 20% reduction on the base recoil (don't forget it goes down with experience too.)
You are 100% right, because the two are not comparable. One fires a full rifle round while the other fires a shortened rifle round. One is a battle rifle while one could be considered an assault rifle.But we can both agree that it doesn't remotely compare to the Mkb, right?
I read your full post. Maybe you should have read mine instead of skimming it. I was reinforcing your point, but I guess you didn't see that.How about you actually read the original post instead of skimming through it? Try doing that from now on so you don't make misinformed posts that are frustrating to read.
I never said the AVT should be balanced with the Mkb. I said it sucked compared to it, which it in fact does, and that the PPSh could be made more realistic which would also have a side effect of balancing the game. There's nothing wrong with balance if it's achieved within a historical context. Which is ironic since the thing causing the problems, the Mkb, has no historical right to be in the game to begin with.
I read your full post. Maybe you should have read mine instead of skimming it. I was reinforcing your point, but I guess you didn't see that.
I also said, "I do agree that the PPSh needs to have its recoil lowered, however."
And I also said, "(Plus the Mkb42 should not even be there.)"
You, sir, skimmed my post.
You're right. I didn't read just your post; I read a lot of the posts below yours AS WELL. Those two semi-paragraphs of text weren't directed at you. You just let them be."Honestly, this would be like comparing an M14 and an M16, and saying that the M16 needs to be nerfed because it is too accurate and has no recoil. It's absolutely ridiculous."
"Since when was war ever balanced??? "rabble rabble this is a video game, not war, rabble rabble." BS, don't use that argument. This game was meant to be realistic, not rock-paper-scissors."
I never said the Mkb should be nerfed or that anything should be balanced in a gamey way; this is what you suggested. You didn't read my post, don't pretend that you did. If so you have serious problems in the reading comprehension department.
You're right. I didn't read just your post; I read a lot of the posts below yours AS WELL. Those two semi-paragraphs of text weren't directed at you. You just let them be.
Sorry. I will return two times after I am done directly discussing a quote instead of once with reinforcing points corresponding. Hopefully that will make my posts more clear.You directly addressed a quote from my post. Who are you kidding?
You have to get 1000s of kills with the PPSH to even get the drum mag, and by that point there is no telling how much the stat buffs at that level will effect the recoil and such.