Tripwire Interactive Forums

Go Back   Tripwire Interactive Forums > Red Orchestra 2 / Rising Storm Forums > RO2/RS General > General Discussion

Reply
Click here to go to the first Dev post in this thread.  
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2010, 04:16 PM
Zetsumei's Avatar
Zetsumei Zetsumei is offline
Rising Storm Team
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 11,622
Default Main gun tank sights.

In the video of igromir we see that when a different range of the sights gets dialed in that the recticle stays in the centre.

Like the sniper scope shouldn't the actual reticle move up and down depending on the range dialed? Like the picture below, or did the pzIV have a different more advanced system?

http://images.yuku.com/image/gif/33d...b11565e813.gif
__________________
Unless specifically stated otherwise, anything I say reflects only my personal opinion and not that of Rising Storm.

Last edited by Zetsumei; 11-04-2010 at 04:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2010, 04:29 PM
Bobdog's Avatar
Bobdog Bobdog is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,910
Default

If you'd read the History and Tactics guide that comes with Ostfront, you'd know how these sights work
__________________

YOU DARE AGREE WITH ME?!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-05-2010, 01:19 PM
sampsa's Avatar
sampsa sampsa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reserve
Posts: 299
Default

This has been bothering me for a while now and this was thread closely attached to it. If I remember correctly there was some delay in T-34's tower turning. When the gunner stopped pushing button that made the tower turn there was a little dealy before the turning actually stopped. Is this going to be implemented into ROHOS? Would also be little balance for inferior P4's favor.

Then again, I think that every tank that time had some dealy...
__________________
"Streams won't hold you, rocks won't stand
For every object overcome,
engineers get the glory"
Reply With Quote
  Click here to go to the next developer post in this thread.   #4  
Old 11-05-2010, 07:05 PM
[TW]Wilsonam's Avatar
[TW]Wilsonam [TW]Wilsonam is offline
VP, Tripwire Int.
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 3,497
Default

Actually, stupidly, Zets is quite right... another little piece we haven't got in yet. And my writing in the very old guides was... wrong.

And there is "lag" in the power traverses on many WWII tanks - both in accelerating and stopping. Gunners would switch to manual traverse for fine tuning...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2010, 07:33 PM
Mormegil's Avatar
Mormegil Mormegil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nargothrond
Posts: 3,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [TW]Wilsonam View Post
Actually, stupidly, Zets is quite right... another little piece we haven't got in yet. And my writing in the very old guides was... wrong.

And there is "lag" in the power traverses on many WWII tanks - both in accelerating and stopping. Gunners would switch to manual traverse for fine tuning...
It's nice to see Devs admit when they're wrong. Seriously, that's the sign of a good researcher.

Edit: I know this because I'm a professional researcher (biological sciences). Luckily, I've never been wrong...wait a sec.
__________________

IS-2: Greatest Tank of Clone War II
"Soda Popinki" in game

Last edited by Mormegil; 11-06-2010 at 03:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2010, 08:11 PM
evulclown evulclown is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mormegil View Post
It's nice to see Devs admit when they're wrong (I, of course, am never wrong). But seriously, that's the sign of a good researcher.
Got to agree to that!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-2010, 09:03 PM
Bobdog's Avatar
Bobdog Bobdog is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,910
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [TW]Wilsonam View Post
Actually, stupidly, Zets is quite right... another little piece we haven't got in yet. And my writing in the very old guides was... wrong.
http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/9...rammjaeger.jpg

Dammit man, for once I think I have the high ground and you let me down

Ah well
__________________

YOU DARE AGREE WITH ME?!

Last edited by Bobdog; 11-05-2010 at 09:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-05-2010, 10:50 PM
Unus Offa, Unus Nex's Avatar
Unus Offa, Unus Nex Unus Offa, Unus Nex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,285
Default

According to what I've been explained by a guy who actually works on WW2 tanks, atleast the hydraulic traverse system used on the Panther & Tiger was accurate enough to be used for fine tuning in traverse alone. According to him you can vary the speed of the traverse by applying different amounts of pressure to a pair of pedals mounted at the gunners feet used to control direction & speed of turret traverse. Raising and lowering the gun ofcourse still required manual operation of a handwheel.

Not sure about the electric system used in the early Panzers, or the hydraulic one used in Russian tanks. But apparently the systems used in the Sherman & T-34 were none-variable one speed only, requiring manual operation for fine tuning aim.

Last edited by Unus Offa, Unus Nex; 11-05-2010 at 10:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2005 - 2013, Tripwire Interactive, LLC