Yes, meaning 1/3 of all students had a 5.Wait, What? Scores from 1 - 5 and 1/3 of the students had a Negative score?
Upvote
0
Yes, meaning 1/3 of all students had a 5.Wait, What? Scores from 1 - 5 and 1/3 of the students had a Negative score?
According to wikipedia it's illegal in some jurisdictions if you must believe the person is a minor and that's the case here, I'd say. Why it's illegal I don't know. Presumably to make those exact sting operations work.
Yes, meaning 1/3 of all students had a 5.
Got a 3(1 is best, 5 is worst/failed) on my first university exam in roman property law. 1/3 of all students were negative lol.
It doesn't have anything to do with math. If you get a 5 you failed and did not pass the test, therefore you are "negative". In austria it's like this(both in school and university): 1 = Very Good, 2 = Good, 3 = Okay, 4 = Still sufficient, 5 = not sufficient
Then, I assume, you still had sex with a minor and that's that.What if you have sex with a minor but you believed she was over 18?
I doubt even the most ever-so-ironic hipster would go to the length of hitting on little girls all night (which, I can only assume, must be a chore to begin with) and bringing condoms to their li'l rendezvous and acting the whole thing out until that Hansen dude showed up some day, at what, girl #2486's place?Also it's easy to say you didn't believe the whole set up in "to catch a predator" and you just went there fully aware of the whole scam. The condoms were just to make it seem you were taking the bait.
Then, I assume, you still had sex with a minor and that's that.
What's your point? That because it's enough to get you in trouble if you believed you were hitting on a kid (!) suddenly only your interpretation of what happened counts?
I always wonder how in "to catch a predator" they are able to arrest those people while they actually did nothing wrong yet. They didn't even chat with an underage girl, it's a paid actress. I'm not supporting them but you can't arrest a guy for something he was about to do if it wasn't a set up. Force them to go to therapy however is another case.
Yea but they chat with a paid actress who's over 18. Nothing illegal with that. Perhaps they could interrogate them and get a search warrant but I think most of them don't have anything incriminating at home.
What if you have sex with a minor but you believed she was over 18?
Also it's easy to say you didn't believe the whole set up in "to catch a predator" and you just went there fully aware of the whole scam. The condoms were just to make it seem you were taking the bait.
But can you arrest someone based on assumptions that he was going to have sex with a minor if the girl wasn't a paid actress. It's like the movie Minority report, is it justified to punish someone for something he was about to do? It's even more of a question in "to catch a predator" since they dangle supposed jailbait infront of a guy's face and when he bites they arrest him.
It's just odd they can arrest you for thinking bad things.
You know, even normal people who are not out to have sex with minors may carry condoms in their wallets. Sometimes even sadly optimistic people, but still!What I get from it is that when you're going to meet a minor, don't bring any condoms because if you get caught you can just tell them you weren't actually going to have sex with her.