Regarding performance
- Thread starter [TW]Ramm-Jaeger
- Start date
All these things i've done a long time ago(including pc cleaning)no use,still 15-20 fps!
Upvote
0
Thank you John! and I Thank your TripWire Team also! you and your Team have made a wonderful tight WW2 Tatical Fps Shooter! Thank you for the great game and the Dedication you put into it! Cheers and good luck on improving the performance! 
Upvote
0
Just the fact that you've acknowledged the issue is enough to make me happy. My sincere thanks.
Upvote
0
This makes a lot of sense now.
A lot of people simply expect far greater performance than they are getting, as they think RO2 / UR3 is a 'light weight' game with regards to graphics.
Not that people don't genuine issues too.
A lot of people simply expect far greater performance than they are getting, as they think RO2 / UR3 is a 'light weight' game with regards to graphics.
Not that people don't genuine issues too.
Upvote
0
Does any of this mean large tank-maps are going to be unlikely unless they're bare of trees and bushes and stuff (at medium to long distances)?
Upvote
0
My biggest issue is the actual graphics to actual performance.
Let's face it, game looks outdated (equivalent to 4-5 year old game) so there is no reason AT ALL that it should perform like Crysis.
If it looked great/new benchmark....I'm fine with it, but it doesn't. FAR FAR FAR from that.
So the performance issues are not justified.
Let's face it, game looks outdated (equivalent to 4-5 year old game) so there is no reason AT ALL that it should perform like Crysis.
If it looked great/new benchmark....I'm fine with it, but it doesn't. FAR FAR FAR from that.
So the performance issues are not justified.
Upvote
0
Map optimizing ?
My FPS are hovering between 15 and (rarely) 50.
My CPU ([email protected]) usage hovers at 50% MAX, ALL THE TIME ON ANY MAP and my GPU (6950 2gb) usage hovers around 20-30% MAX with pits at 0% during which my game is stuck at 15fps ON ANY MAP.
And I have horrible stuttering ALL THE TIME, which are even worse when the artillery is called.
Here is a screenshot showing the kind of performance I have (on medium, upper left is my GPU usage, bottom left is each CPU core usage)
Don't tell me it is bad map optimization, if it was, my CPU and/or my GPU usage would be at 100% most of the time ; this is something deeper and different here.
If my GPU or CPU usage was 100% or even 80%, I'd say "yeah ok, time to buy new hardware" but here my computer has enough horsepower to run the game twice, and if it was possible I'm sure it wouldn't change anything to my average FPS.
It's good to hear you are working things out but I'm affraid you are going the wrong way.
Now the only hope I have left is a brand new saving AMD driver optimized for RO2...
My FPS are hovering between 15 and (rarely) 50.
My CPU ([email protected]) usage hovers at 50% MAX, ALL THE TIME ON ANY MAP and my GPU (6950 2gb) usage hovers around 20-30% MAX with pits at 0% during which my game is stuck at 15fps ON ANY MAP.
And I have horrible stuttering ALL THE TIME, which are even worse when the artillery is called.
Here is a screenshot showing the kind of performance I have (on medium, upper left is my GPU usage, bottom left is each CPU core usage)
Don't tell me it is bad map optimization, if it was, my CPU and/or my GPU usage would be at 100% most of the time ; this is something deeper and different here.
If my GPU or CPU usage was 100% or even 80%, I'd say "yeah ok, time to buy new hardware" but here my computer has enough horsepower to run the game twice, and if it was possible I'm sure it wouldn't change anything to my average FPS.
It's good to hear you are working things out but I'm affraid you are going the wrong way.
Now the only hope I have left is a brand new saving AMD driver optimized for RO2...
Last edited:
Upvote
0
I agree. Saying that Crossfire works, but we don;t see any gains because our CPU's are too weak seems a little bit silly.
Especially seeing I have a high clocked top of the line CPU that never gets above 40% usage.
Upvote
0
Maybe you didn't actually read the opening post?
And what game from 4 -5 years ago are you referring to?
The game looks fantastic to me... but the world would be very dull if we all had the same taste.
Upvote
0
Rendering. Distance. No. Comparison. "Faked" distance details do not count. Crysis 2 is almost a corridor shooter compared to Far Cry, for example. Please consider the facts and details before making assumptions - RO2, as John says, is pumping far more total geometry than Crysis is. The shiny shiny has blinded you to the details I'm afraid
Upvote
0
even more good news, i think the performance might affect me, i seem to get a solid 20~ fps no matter what detail setting (or map) i put the sliders at, if i nudge detail and texture detail to high, its the same frame rate as ultra. although my pc is getting toward 3 years old now. its budget and there is always the chance i have some kind of bottleneck. hardware never was my 'thing'.
phenom II x2 545 3.0ghz
4gb ram
4650 hd 1gb
1600x900 res
shadows i keep on low fx and processing on med. game looks great still and i don't struggle with 20fps, i just feel that i could be getting 30 at least perhaps if there was more gpu usage.
phenom II x2 545 3.0ghz
4gb ram
4650 hd 1gb
1600x900 res
shadows i keep on low fx and processing on med. game looks great still and i don't struggle with 20fps, i just feel that i could be getting 30 at least perhaps if there was more gpu usage.
Upvote
0
Rendering. Distance. No. Comparison. "Faked" distance details do not count. Crysis 2 is almost a corridor shooter compared to Far Cry, for example. Please consider the facts and details before making assumptions - RO2, as John says, is pumping far more total geometry than Crysis is. The shiny shiny has blinded you to the details I'm afraid
It's irrelevant to the end user. What I see is FAR FAR FAR from Crysis as far as visuals go.
But I understand, unfortunately most people won't.
I'm pretty sure that's equivalent to onboard graphics. You are lucky you can even play the game to be honest.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
...and one of the reasons why you're CPU limited is because there are thousands of discrete objects rendered in a single frame. Each one of those objects requires the CPU to crunch some data and send that to GPU for rendering. So yea, it's partly a map optimization issue too.
Upvote
0
Lets face facts here guys, when the game is only using 30 to 50 % of our gpu's somethings wrong, i have yet to see my gpu usage on my 580 go over 50 somthing % im confident that they will fix these issues but for now the game is broken.
Upvote
0
I agree with Skewp, the framerate was the worst on Pavlov. I found that deleting the config files gave me enough of a bump to be able to finish the level, but of course I'd like to see what the patch can do!
I love the support you guys have, there are plenty of us out there appreciative of your efforts, and understanding enough to realize that the game isn't patched by waving a wand or snapping your fingers. Thanks so much for all your hard work!
I love the support you guys have, there are plenty of us out there appreciative of your efforts, and understanding enough to realize that the game isn't patched by waving a wand or snapping your fingers. Thanks so much for all your hard work!
Upvote
0
yeah its getting on i heard the 4670 is about 20% faster but i've never had a game where setting the detail higher ended with the same fps as a lower setting. i think my card renders faster than some of the 5xxx series.
Upvote
0
i found that if you delete the game erase all folders of it and reinstall and defrag you will get better performance. now this does not fix all problem but some for many. try it
Upvote
0