Just as I figured, caught your hand in the cookie jar "son"It's all a matter of interpretation son. Why do I need to quote anybody when the posts are all here for you to see? You are splitting hairs...arguing for its own sake.
Who was the one looking for an argument? As I recall you were the one calling people naive then using the internet geek "Orly ". (Troll much?)
..then not having the testicle fortitude to even backup your statement?
Chicken sh-it, pure and simple
Once again, I ask you to quote where you think anyone said statistics were irrelevant.