Minor, I know, but I noticed there is no 3rd person animation for the checking of ammo. Just wondering if it's intentional or bug?
RO2 No 3rd person ammo check?
- Thread starter Proud_God
- Start date
Upvote
0
That three-word combination is the answer to a few too many aspects of this game for my liking.
Upvote
0
That three-word combination is the answer to a few too many aspects of this game for my liking.
I agree its unfortunate but the game needs to run.
Upvote
0
. . . and how would an extra animation, that is played so infrequently affect performance so much? I'd put the reason for this on the laziness of the developers.
Upvote
0
Agree. Its 2014... such animation even performed by the whole server at the same time, can't drop the fps to unplayable state (if even causes any impact at all)
Upvote
0
that three-word combination is the answer to a few too many aspects of this game for my liking.
+1
Upvote
0
Same reason you can't see your own shadow, you have no mouth animations, and so on.
TWI says its for performance reasons, the stuff is there easy to add. So I don't think it's pure laziness.
TWI says its for performance reasons, the stuff is there easy to add. So I don't think it's pure laziness.
Upvote
0
One of my favorite features of dibbler's mutator is that you can see your own shadow. I would like to see that in the vanilla game. I don't see how one extra shadow can affect performance, tbh.
Upvote
0
I'm not saying it does. I'm saying that's what TWI would say imo.
If anything, the shadows look weird when you check ammo and your shadow dosn't move.
Upvote
0
No performence drop when we tested IOM with 64 people.
Atleast I never dropped below 62fps, my GPU&CPU load stayed in the normal boundaries and not a single person was complaining about worse performence.. you don't render them all at the same time anyway.. unless you play Appartments or junk like that
Last edited:
Upvote
0
That dial-up server supposed to survive 10 people at once is not a good testing environmentWell, except for the ping
Upvote
0
I didn't say that's what you said either.
What I was trying to say is that TWI's explanation for the lack of your own shadow being rendered doesn't make sense.
Upvote
0