Actually, if you read the thread, you'd see it was meant to be handled differently for purposes of a new play style. And right here, I'm just making a suggestion, if you have reasons like these to say "no", great, hit me with it but no need to get mega-defensive and raeg and tell me to shut up.I picked it out carefully for a reason Gibby. i'm not even modeling it - i gave a list of choices to a friend who picked the m249 as the one he wanted to model. But suck it up. I didn't pick it because it was in cod, or arma, or CSS or any other retarded game. IT WAS PICKED BECAUSE ITS THE GUN THE TEAM WANTED! Gimme a better reason or shut up. Oh, and the bren gun fires slower than the SCAR, has within 10 ammo count, and uses a slightly larger round. So, its a puffed up verion of the scar.
My reasoning is is, TWI are letting guns get in the game because they are up to TWI standard. Will your M249 be up to their standards? Probably! If so, congratulations. But here's a good reason to counter yours - would anyone in the team care to have a little bit of originality? Would you like to perhaps see a little originality in KF? If so, since you have the skill to get it in there, don't waste it by making M249 SAW model #102318. I'm not implying that you drool over terrible games, I'm implying that you and your team don't want to think about being a little bit different. Hell, don't make a GPMG or a Bren. Go and find a nice-looking MG that has little or no exposure in videogames and change that.
Now approach this in a little more civilised way or shut up.