..sometimes i wonder.
But nutters aside i can see why many ppl chose German.
For the bulk of the eastern front conflict they were the underdog, with generally speaking technically superior equipment and tactical knowledge facing the insurmountable odds of a rampaging, somewhat more primative, enemy that grossly outnumbered them.
This is often the traditional protaganist's role in games.
I agree with you , however when some people say that the Germans had better equipment , i have some doubts now , perhaps i could discuss this with you and you could correct me but here is how i see it :
If we look at tanks for instance , they had T-34's and KV1's since 1941 that probably had no equivalent at the time , then later they had at least as good tanks if not better and in far greater quantities (T-34/85 , IS2 etc ) . If we look at small arms , they had the Ppsh41 that was more reliable than mp40's , higher rate of fire and more ammos , gladly used by German troops , you see it often in documentaries . Rifles , they had the best semi-auto rifle in the SVT40 , a lot more reliable than early G41 that were susceptible to jamming because of humidity , dusts etc. , also a well manufactured Mosin was still very accurate and with a longer barrel than the Karabiner . Then if we look at snipers , Russians had the better optics that you could adjust with your fingers easily and quickly , the sight could be zeroed very quickly with just 2-3 shots before the sight is perfectly aligned (zeroed) , whereas the German optic had to be modulated with turning a screw with a tool , which was difficult in the winter (and slow ) , you needed at least 4-5 shots to get it zeroed right
Then if we look at the equipment (clothes ) , i saw a documentary on Stalingrad telling Soviet had the warmest equipment up to 4-5
Last edited:
Upvote
0