What Nagels had too say...holds true....when using 'onboard com / TS'
and Nimsky
I do use suppressive fire (firing down a street in the hope to make a few kills for example, or to block a chokepoint), but the guy with the better aim will always win in a firefight. As it should be imo. So in other words, suppressive fire only works to force the enemy to take cover. But as soon as he's behind cover, expect that he will shoot back very accurately.
if half the players that play RO,cant handle a bolt that maybe overstating it i know...ill keep moving if...if i have enough sprint left..and there's good cover ahead...if i Know Nagel's is there i might just take the first bit of cover
and Nimsky
I do use suppressive fire (firing down a street in the hope to make a few kills for example, or to block a chokepoint), but the guy with the better aim will always win in a firefight. As it should be imo. So in other words, suppressive fire only works to force the enemy to take cover. But as soon as he's behind cover, expect that he will shoot back very accurately.
if half the players that play RO,cant handle a bolt that maybe overstating it i know...ill keep moving if...if i have enough sprint left..and there's good cover ahead...if i Know Nagel's is there i might just take the first bit of cover
Upvote
0