Also I've been saying it a lot of times, this is not about realism or anything else it's about the gameplay (karmakazeNZ reread my posts) I never said it wasn't realistic I said it wasn't fun or challenging.
Try taking your own advice. The game play is brought about by the realistic game mechanics. The game is MEANT to be realistic. If you don't like that, too bad. That's what it was advertised as.
You may be right though, you may be able to shoot accuractly with a bullet in your body at 60-80 meters away
A certain Fijian won the VC for operating a 25 pounder artillery piece single handedly for quite some time AFTER he had his jaw shot off. Saving his unit from a massively overwhelming attack in the process. He was hit several more times, and after getting help from another member of his unit, who was also wounded, and at points aiming and firing the gun at point blank range, he succumbed to his wounds. The soldier that came to assist carried on fighting, wounded, for another lengthy period of time until the attack was finally driven back with air strikes.
It's more than possible. It happens quiet a lot actually. You have to do something pretty amazing to even get noticed.
But still if you think RO:HOS is fun because it's super realistic and you enjoy the gameplay then there's little to discuss I fear.
Because you have nothing to discuss. You know what I'm saying is true, you just don't want to admit it.
PS: it's not bout how I play, it's how everyone plays, you can shoot a bullet in the camping spots and be 90% sure to get someone.
No ****. Bad players, play badly. Good players beat them. Are you surprised?
Upvote
0