First off, what are you talking about? I have a negative opinion on a feature SUGGESTION from the community. That's not bashing RO2. I obviously care, but that doesn't mean I have to care about the detail obsessed community trying to make RO2 into a RO+, or Arma. I'm someone who liked RO somewhat but thought it was clunky as hell, and want to see RO2 be a great shooter, not a great 3d history lesson. I'm a huge history buff, but it has doesn't matter in a video game, in fact it's kind of disturbing.
you know that good 20% of the suggestions from the community here will most likely land in game due to the fact that those same suggestions were in RO.As for the RO1 felt clunky,yes it did,iven a long player of RO will tell you he wish that his soldier didnt felt like stiff robot + the fact that you cant interupt actions that are already in process.
But as you see from the videos RO2 is different in this areas,its more forgiving for new comers and veterans also.
But as for the sugestion in details that this community cares,I mean I wasnt here from the beggining of the game but to me it looks like that TWI team were more obsessed with historical accurate details of clothes,vehicles,weapons,accurate maps and the people who fell for this game bit the bullet and they are more into the details than TWI itself.
I know I'm not full of it,dev team travelled all the way to Russia to take pictures of that factory,and museum and what not else....these sort of details that they descided to do in the game its not because the regulars here are detail freaks,because TWI are freaks them self when it comes to history accurate stuff in general.
It wont bring anything into the game core,but game will feel unique than any other game out there.
Upvote
0