Thick Rifle Scope reticules...why?
- Thread starter Conscript
- Start date
You can adjust the range meaning you can set it so that the target will be hit at the tip of the crosshairs or even above the tip of the crosshairs.
If anything sights that have a dot in the middle or a cross in the middle for me block exactly that spot i want to look at the middle of my scope. By setting the range slightly higher than your distance allows you to aim for instance a bit below the target and hit him. Giving you a full and clear picture of your enemy.
Upvote
0
In ost you could slightly change the scope reticule anyway. I believe there is an option that slightly manipulates the reticule thickness.
Therefore, like some of my other posts, as long as they don't change that option, this concern is not important.
Therefore, like some of my other posts, as long as they don't change that option, this concern is not important.
Upvote
0
Really? I've never heard of this. All I knew was that you could go from "textured" (black around scope) to the "3d" kind or whatever where you see outside the scope as well.
Upvote
0
The 3d scope was pointier since all 3d scopes used the soviet sight design. And in a way by changing to the smaller scope the recticle is smaller as well. But in all reality that doesn't change the real width.
Upvote
0
In my OSt, there is an option to change scope detail. There are 3 different settings, low medium and high. I know they change the scope reticule slightly.
Upvote
0
big and small 3d scope always show a pointy russian scope sight in Roost. Where as the textured scope of the K98 shows the wide less pointy one.
So in general you cannot select so much between different scope sights, as it just happens to be that textured and 3d use a different cross hair.
So in general you cannot select so much between different scope sights, as it just happens to be that textured and 3d use a different cross hair.
Upvote
0
You're right, shut down the forums, everything's available on Google anyway right? I mean, I should of gone to Google with a vague, rather specific history question, rather than approach a forum full of people who might be knowledgeable on the subject.
And it's not like I wanted to promote a discussion about the game mechanics at all is it? God forbid I should do that on the discussion forums for the very game in question!
And it's not like I wanted to promote a discussion about the game mechanics at all is it? God forbid I should do that on the discussion forums for the very game in question!
Upvote
0