Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules

CHANGES
  • Items changed, or highlighted for future attention, on 20 July 2013 are highlighted in yellow.
Global Rules
  • Forum moderators may or may not be Tripwire Interactive staff members, but either way, please respect them, as they are the authority of the forums. Speaking to them with intentional spite will not be tolerated and may result in the loss of your forum privileges.
  • Any decisions made by any member of staff or moderator are final and not subject to discussion. Doing so may result in a ban from the site. The owners of Tripwire Interactive Forums reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason, as well as to remove access to the forums for any individuals with or without warning for breaches of the rules.
  • If you have a complaint regarding another user, PM the appropriate moderators, or if you have an administrative issue, [RO]schneidzekk.
General Behaviour
  • Use the search function before posting. Chances are your question has already been answered.
  • Use a title that describes the content of your post. Don't use all caps or special characters to draw attention either in the title or the body of the post.
  • Up to 10 emoticons are allowed in a post
  • Political discussions are prohibited.
  • Flaming - We do not tolerate abusive, malicious, personal attacks. You will be banned if you persist in this behavior.
  • Trolls - Anyone deliberately antagonizing other forum users by posting 'flame bait' type messages is not welcome. You will be banned (possibly without warning depending on the severity of the issue) if you persist in this behavior.
  • Personal insults (directed at anyone) will result in a ban. If the behavior is not corrected, it will be made more permanent.
  • Constructive criticism is welcome. However keep in mind we (and other forums goers) may not agree with you. If you can't keep the conversation civil, you will be removed from the forums.
  • The use of hyperbole, one liners, and images as part of a forum debate is likely to get you infracted. You have many ways to participate and be a constructive part of this community, even when you disagree.
  • To make the highlighted bits above 100% clear to everyone, the following WILL NOT BE TOLERATED:
    1. Personal attacks, insults, antagonism of any forum-goers, moderators or Tripwire Interactive staff.
    2. Breaches of confidentiality and privacy of any sort.
    3. Any form of racism, bigotry or attacks on race, creed or color.
    4. Linking to posts on other forums related to ANY of the above, whether you are the originator or not, without exception.
  • There has been too much in the way of abhorrent personal behaviors in the past. These will cease. It doesn't matter who started it or who reacted to it - it will all result in moderator action. If you have to indulge your hatreds, for whatever reason, go do it elsewhere - and do not try and drag our forum-goers over to enjoy your hatreds.
  • We understand that people have strong feelings about our games, what we do for a living and how we respond (or don't) to comments on the forums. We all aren't going to agree about everything. So, BE CIVIL in your disagreements!
DO NOTs
  • DO NOT Transmit any message, information, data, text, software or graphic files, or other materials ("Content") that is unlawful (including illegal drug usage), harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful or racially, ethnically, sexually or otherwise objectionable. This includes publicizing private information, such as individual's real names, IP addresses and anything else that might be used to identify them to the freakier members of the internet. This also means you may NOT publically share private communications (PM, email or anything else) without the original poster's permission.
  • DO NOT Post or transmit any Content that contains a virus, Trojan horse or other mischievous Content.
  • DO NOT Post or transmit any unsolicited advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail", "spam", "chain letters", "pyramid schemes" or any other form of solicitation.
  • DO NOT link to posts on any other forums, or any other form of media, that breaches our rules. It will be treated just the same as if you had posted it here.
  • DO NOT Double Post, cross Post or restart closed threads.
  • DO NOT Intentionally or unintentionally violate any applicable local, state, national or international law, rule or regulation.
  • DO NOT Upload or transmit any Content that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights ("Rights") of any party.
  • DO NOT post cheats or exploits; THIS INCLUDES ALL/ANY REFERENCES TO HACKING, PIRATED SOFTWARE etc.
  • DO NOT complain about being banned from a server and DO NOT complain about other players on servers - that is between you and the admin, no need to get the community involved.
Username, Avatar and Signature Rules
  • Multiple registrations result in a ban.
  • No offensive user names
  • Avatars:
    Avatars are disabled.
  • All signatures should not exceed the following size limits, you can have both text and images
  • - For text signatures: 4 lines normal size, 8 lines small size and up to 100 chars per line. Font sizes above 2 are not allowed. (Blank lines count as lines.)
  • - For images in signatures: 1 image up to 400 pixels wide, 150 pixels tall and 100kb in size plus 2 lines normal size text and up to 100 chars per line
Netiquette: Written text has no inflection, and, as such, you should be careful how you write your messages as interpretation will vary from person to person. Please take advantage of the built-in emoticons to add such expression to your words. Please remember the golden rule: to treat other forum users the way you would like to be treated. Please use common courtesy, and enjoy using Red Orchestra's forums
Offensive material
The following is a list of some things that MAY be considered "offensive" by the moderators and the team. This is NOT an exclusive list and it does depend very much on context.

Crossing the line into "offensive" territory is likely to get you asked to change your name, sig or avatar or to withdraw/delete posts. This will be done politely by the moderators. If you refuse to comply further action WILL be taken once started, ultimately leading to banning from the forums.

A key point: please attempt to use your brains. What is mild humour to you may well be deeply offensive to others. While we have no intention of acting as politically-correct "thought police", we are on the lookout for those things that can cause offense and, in some cases, are actually still illegal in some jurisdictions.
  1. Names recalling notorious war criminals or personalities.
  2. Names recalling atrocities and war crimes in general, or units with particularly odious histories.
  3. Use of obscenities and expletives.
  4. Blatant racism, mysogynism or many other "ism"s.
  5. Use of symbolism and regalia recalling Nazism or Fascism; this does not include pics of soldiers who happen to have such symbols on their uniform, unless we feel this has been done to provoke. Please note that many Nazi symbols (including the Swastika) are still illegal in Germany and other countries and considered deeply offensive by many Europeans.
  6. Use of symbolism and regalia recalling Stalinism.
  7. On both the previous two, the moderators' views on the intention and impact of use of such symbols will be final - not yours. Please be understanding if you are advised to change something.
  8. In general, if a sig/avatar represents your allegiances in-game and is clearly "in part", it is likely to be fine; if the moderators feel you are trying to demonstrate unpalatable political allegiances, or to use it in an attempt to ridicule or provoke others you WILL be asked to change it. RO is NOT the place to make any extremist political statements of any kind.
Examples:
So people get the idea, some examples that would be considered offensive, numbered as above:
  1. "Hitler", "Beria"
  2. "NKVD Blocking Detachment", "Einsatzgruppen"
  3. This one should be pretty obvious...
  4. So should this - and it includes calling all Germans "Nazis" and all Soviets/Russians "Commies". It got boring 50 years ago, so stop it.
  5. Use of swastikas, fasces, SS-runes and so on for the Axis.
  6. There is actually very little overt symbolism from the Stalinist era; the hammer-and-sickle isn't offensive per se.
A simple rule-of-thumb: many Europeans find Nazi symbolism of any sort offensive; many Americans still find Soviet symbolism offensive. Engage your brain before using.




Final Note: this is NOT open to debate, so please do NOT start whining and moaning if a moderator asks you to change something. They will advise at first, giving reasons, then, if you take no notice, they will step up the pressure through to banning.
See more
See less

Everyone loves a good debate... PC Gamer Article

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Everyone loves a good debate... PC Gamer Article

    ... so here is the kickoff for one, from a discussion between Evan Lahti of PC Gamer and our own John Gibson, while Evan was out here for a look at Rising Storm:

    http://www.pcgamer.com/2013/03/13/ca...a-2-interview/

    Discuss

  • #2
    I think that Cod is a skill based shooter but that there is just too much murk around the game. For me games these days just try to cram in way too much into the game, and in the end the total balance and cohesion gets the long end.

    Games rather add 3 more features, than actually continuing to work and refine what they have.

    The old Quake & UT games had limited functions and abilities, but every single function and weapon was nearly balanced into perfection. Which meant that with little knowledge you could already get close to knowing all there is, at what point the only differentiation factor is skill. A quake game is actually easier to get into than for instance a cod game.

    I think RO2 fell prey to the same thing in a sense. RO2 got a lot of nice things on the feature list, but a lot of those sadly are still at a point that you could remove them and nobody would notice. (think squad system for instance).

    So for me I think too many games are trying to create feature lists that are as long as possible. While in the process start to forget that actually every single thing added needs to have a reason within the same universe.

    A big danger of for instance RPG like systems is the effect that older players that are better than newer players, will get the better goodies as well. Making it often in games that not necessarily the best player will come out at the top, but rather the player that played the game for the most hours will come out at top.

    I've always been a fan of simple games, however every single feature in my opinion should be learnable and controllable by the user. Recoil - allow people to learn it, Suppression/Sway - allow people to compensate it.

    I can understand as well that any form of delay be it in starting to move or putting up iron sights can feel frustrating to players. The primary reason being it gives you a brief moment where you are not in control of your character any more.
    However in case of say RO after a while you find out, that sometimes inherently negative things such as delays, can actually generate an overall gameplay that generates a better experience. With the difficulty of RO being that its in a fine place inbetween the games aiming at simulation like the Arma series and the more Arcade shooters.

    Personally I always liked the game for the similarity of RO compared to instagib in terms of fatality, as well as the ability to control all sorts of assets like sway and recoil. However although RO2 got great additions, in terms of simplicity, and competitiveness I would probably still say that the RO mod before 3.0 was my favourite incarnation.
    Last edited by Zetsumei; 03-14-2013, 12:34 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      I concur with what Zetsumei said: well worked-out, deep gameplay is the most important thing.


      [QUOTE=Ramm]but I
      Supporting:
      Disapproving: progression, spawn on SL, spawns close to cap (RSOD)
      Since: beta 1.0 UT2003

      Comment


      • #4
        i played it once and i must say, it's realy hardcore game
        i agree with everything that John Gibson said! that's dirty true.

        Comment


        • #5
          Meh, I still have fun in-game, feature bloat or no feature bloat.

          Faults aside, Red Orchestra 2 is still one of the best MP shooters out there. It's certainly the one I put the most time in.

          The start was a little rocky, but it sounds like Tripwire now knows that a harsh, unforgiving, realistic feel is what makes their game stand out.

          Then again, I guess I'm from the other side of the COD-to-clunky spectrum... anything faster-paced than Classic weapons handling is too fast for me. That healthy bit of sway and a bit of a delay to iron sights is what keeps me in love with the game.
          sigpic
          Classic forever.

          Comment


          • #6
            Action mode aside though, let's be fair on saying there are definitely some inconsistencies with his game and his argument.

            Case in point the emphasis on momentum and speed while maintaining the ability to sprint full speed up and down stairs, or the system that rewards players not for their skill, but for how long they use their weapon and progress it. It was fine for Killing Floor because it was a team-based game against AI, but RO2 isn't that concept.
            Last edited by Zennousha; 03-13-2013, 06:37 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              +100 respect points

              Comment


              • #8
                I agree completely. And reading from the comments on the article, so does everyone else. I'm glad to see there are many other like-minded gamers.

                I see the word is out now that Evan went over to try out Rising Storm, and I hope to see some positive remarks relating to the game. I feel that Rising Storm has a wider appeal than RO2 because of the pretty setting, the weapon variety, and playing as Americans of course...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Is this supposed to be irony?

                  You guys basically took the CoD formula and applied it to Red Orchestra. Ruining a unique game and community in the progress. Now you're saying "CoD has ruined a generation" ? Is this a joke?

                  I can't believe how two-faced TWI has become. Not counting that this is just a cheap advertisement attempt for Rising Storm, trying to get attention by throwing mud at mainstream games.
                  Last edited by Rak; 03-13-2013, 08:14 PM.

                  RO Bitter-Veteran. Creator of RO-Kryukovo.
                  I support the "RO Devs Classic" mode!11

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Y
                    Originally posted by Rak View Post
                    Is this supposed to be irony?

                    You guys basically took the CoD formula and applied it to Red Orchestra. Ruining a unique game and community in the progress. Now you're saying "CoD has ruined a generation" ? Is this a joke?

                    I can't believe how two-faced TWI has become. Not counting that this is just a cheap advertisement attempt for Rising Storm, trying to get attention by throwing mud at mainstream games.
                    I know, I was like isn't that the game style they went after with the sequel. Maybe they finally realized they should stick with their original take on a first person shooter, but I doubt it. Like you said, it's more of marketing scheme like what they did when they released ro2.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Rak View Post
                      Is this supposed to be irony?
                      My thoughts. Appearently he still doesn't really realize that a lot of the competitive guys left the community because they cod-ified the gameplay and lowered the skill ceiling to a ridculous level. Fair enough, he provided some good laughs.
                      Beta rig: i5 2500k // 8GB Ram // ATI 5750 // Win7

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hmmm,

                        To be a small fish in a big (COD'ish) pond

                        - or -

                        To be the big fish in a smaller (Realism) pond.

                        --------------------------------------------------

                        For the most part, I agree with what John has said in the article. The makers of COD have created a pretty but dumbed down game that the masses have somehow flocked to. They play it because of the commercials, because its easy, because all their other friends play it, whatever and that is ok if that's what you like. But it has dumbed down what people expect and what they think a game should play like and that is a shame because it seems to confuse a lot of dullards who can't think outside the box about how to play another game.

                        As for the rest, I go back to my pond statement and you can make of it what you will.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Rak View Post
                          Is this supposed to be irony?

                          You guys basically took the CoD formula and applied it to Red Orchestra. Ruining a unique game and community in the progress. Now you're saying "CoD has ruined a generation" ? Is this a joke?

                          I can't believe how two-faced TWI has become. Not counting that this is just a cheap advertisement attempt for Rising Storm, trying to get attention by throwing mud at mainstream games.
                          Hahaha, absolutely right. Leave the irony and sarcasm to us Germans. We are better at it.

                          I read the interview and all I can do is *facepalm*. Good luck with Rising Storm!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            To be fair to part of the gaming crowd, I should probably also point out that, for consoles, 4-person split screen is probably one reason why Halo and COD games sell so well... and why I'll take an hour and blow off some steam by hunting down my roommates in Black Ops 2 or Halo 4 on the Xbox every once in a while... even if my preference is unquestionably biased towards less pedestrian games.

                            It DOES help when a friend who doesn't game much comes over and is still able to scavenge a few kills and doesn't feel too bad about themselves.

                            Exclusively PC gamers have no such excuses, though.
                            sigpic
                            Classic forever.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by =GG= Mr Moe View Post
                              Hmmm,

                              To be a small fish in a big (COD'ish) pond

                              - or -

                              To be the big fish in a smaller (Realism) pond.
                              This really.

                              Frankly, I don't think TWI making RO2 have a separate action mode was that great an idea. I think it's damn good of them to make the effort to try appeal to different kinds of players, but I don't believe it being worthwhile. If TWI did RO2 as classic mode to begin with, we'd probably have new tanks and transports by now, no? The "easy mode" is like a throwaway feature.

                              RO2 is in a niche of its own, and it's best to keep it that way. That's why it was successful in the first place, because it filled one attractive niche. And it's a niche that's not for everyone. And that's okay. It's the same reason why I don't play The Sims.

                              However, it's smart to make the game accessible. RO1 was clunky and tough to get into (though it was wholly rewarding) and some key things just weren't explained very well to new players. RO1's formula as a game is totally fine, it's just the difficulty of understanding it at first and some of the game's limitations/old tech that really needed to be improved.

                              But if the spoon-feeding FPS games out there didn't exist in the first place to become the popular thing, I think TWI would be better off when it came to appealing to the playerbase as they wouldn't have had to try attracting them. The initial release could have went down better in that regard, too.

                              But yes, if it came down to a vote, I'd vote that TWI should become the big fish in a new pond. Not a little fish in the other pond. I wanna see more games with the complexity and the rewarding experience of RO and KF, I'd like developers elsewhere someday say "hey, these guys called Tripwire are really raking it in by filling niches instead of appealing to the lowest common denominator, let's try it out ourselves."

                              It'd be like the 90s again, but with new technology.
                              Last edited by C_Gibby; 03-13-2013, 09:39 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X