Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

WIP Forum Upgrade

Please pardon our mess as we continue to iterate on the forum style, css and images. If you have any suggestions be sure to let us know in the off topic part of the forum!
2 of 2 < >

Forum Rules

CHANGES
  • Items changed, or highlighted for future attention, on 20 July 2013 are highlighted in yellow.
Global Rules
  • Forum moderators may or may not be Tripwire Interactive staff members, but either way, please respect them, as they are the authority of the forums. Speaking to them with intentional spite will not be tolerated and may result in the loss of your forum privileges.
  • Any decisions made by any member of staff or moderator are final and not subject to discussion. Doing so may result in a ban from the site. The owners of Tripwire Interactive Forums reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason, as well as to remove access to the forums for any individuals with or without warning for breaches of the rules.
  • If you have a complaint regarding another user, PM the appropriate moderators, or if you have an administrative issue, [RO]schneidzekk.
General Behaviour
  • Use the search function before posting. Chances are your question has already been answered.
  • Use a title that describes the content of your post. Don't use all caps or special characters to draw attention either in the title or the body of the post.
  • Up to 10 emoticons are allowed in a post
  • Political discussions are prohibited.
  • Flaming - We do not tolerate abusive, malicious, personal attacks. You will be banned if you persist in this behavior.
  • Trolls - Anyone deliberately antagonizing other forum users by posting 'flame bait' type messages is not welcome. You will be banned (possibly without warning depending on the severity of the issue) if you persist in this behavior.
  • Personal insults (directed at anyone) will result in a ban. If the behavior is not corrected, it will be made more permanent.
  • Constructive criticism is welcome. However keep in mind we (and other forums goers) may not agree with you. If you can't keep the conversation civil, you will be removed from the forums.
  • The use of hyperbole, one liners, and images as part of a forum debate is likely to get you infracted. You have many ways to participate and be a constructive part of this community, even when you disagree.
  • To make the highlighted bits above 100% clear to everyone, the following WILL NOT BE TOLERATED:
    1. Personal attacks, insults, antagonism of any forum-goers, moderators or Tripwire Interactive staff.
    2. Breaches of confidentiality and privacy of any sort.
    3. Any form of racism, bigotry or attacks on race, creed or color.
    4. Linking to posts on other forums related to ANY of the above, whether you are the originator or not, without exception.
  • There has been too much in the way of abhorrent personal behaviors in the past. These will cease. It doesn't matter who started it or who reacted to it - it will all result in moderator action. If you have to indulge your hatreds, for whatever reason, go do it elsewhere - and do not try and drag our forum-goers over to enjoy your hatreds.
  • We understand that people have strong feelings about our games, what we do for a living and how we respond (or don't) to comments on the forums. We all aren't going to agree about everything. So, BE CIVIL in your disagreements!
DO NOTs
  • DO NOT Transmit any message, information, data, text, software or graphic files, or other materials ("Content") that is unlawful (including illegal drug usage), harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful or racially, ethnically, sexually or otherwise objectionable. This includes publicizing private information, such as individual's real names, IP addresses and anything else that might be used to identify them to the freakier members of the internet. This also means you may NOT publically share private communications (PM, email or anything else) without the original poster's permission.
  • DO NOT Post or transmit any Content that contains a virus, Trojan horse or other mischievous Content.
  • DO NOT Post or transmit any unsolicited advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail", "spam", "chain letters", "pyramid schemes" or any other form of solicitation.
  • DO NOT link to posts on any other forums, or any other form of media, that breaches our rules. It will be treated just the same as if you had posted it here.
  • DO NOT Double Post, cross Post or restart closed threads.
  • DO NOT Intentionally or unintentionally violate any applicable local, state, national or international law, rule or regulation.
  • DO NOT Upload or transmit any Content that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights ("Rights") of any party.
  • DO NOT post cheats or exploits; THIS INCLUDES ALL/ANY REFERENCES TO HACKING, PIRATED SOFTWARE etc.
  • DO NOT complain about being banned from a server and DO NOT complain about other players on servers - that is between you and the admin, no need to get the community involved.
Username, Avatar and Signature Rules
  • Multiple registrations result in a ban.
  • No offensive user names
  • Avatars:
    Avatars are disabled.
  • All signatures should not exceed the following size limits, you can have both text and images
  • - For text signatures: 4 lines normal size, 8 lines small size and up to 100 chars per line. Font sizes above 2 are not allowed. (Blank lines count as lines.)
  • - For images in signatures: 1 image up to 400 pixels wide, 150 pixels tall and 100kb in size plus 2 lines normal size text and up to 100 chars per line
Netiquette: Written text has no inflection, and, as such, you should be careful how you write your messages as interpretation will vary from person to person. Please take advantage of the built-in emoticons to add such expression to your words. Please remember the golden rule: to treat other forum users the way you would like to be treated. Please use common courtesy, and enjoy using Red Orchestra's forums
Offensive material
The following is a list of some things that MAY be considered "offensive" by the moderators and the team. This is NOT an exclusive list and it does depend very much on context.

Crossing the line into "offensive" territory is likely to get you asked to change your name, sig or avatar or to withdraw/delete posts. This will be done politely by the moderators. If you refuse to comply further action WILL be taken once started, ultimately leading to banning from the forums.

A key point: please attempt to use your brains. What is mild humour to you may well be deeply offensive to others. While we have no intention of acting as politically-correct "thought police", we are on the lookout for those things that can cause offense and, in some cases, are actually still illegal in some jurisdictions.
  1. Names recalling notorious war criminals or personalities.
  2. Names recalling atrocities and war crimes in general, or units with particularly odious histories.
  3. Use of obscenities and expletives.
  4. Blatant racism, mysogynism or many other "ism"s.
  5. Use of symbolism and regalia recalling Nazism or Fascism; this does not include pics of soldiers who happen to have such symbols on their uniform, unless we feel this has been done to provoke. Please note that many Nazi symbols (including the Swastika) are still illegal in Germany and other countries and considered deeply offensive by many Europeans.
  6. Use of symbolism and regalia recalling Stalinism.
  7. On both the previous two, the moderators' views on the intention and impact of use of such symbols will be final - not yours. Please be understanding if you are advised to change something.
  8. In general, if a sig/avatar represents your allegiances in-game and is clearly "in part", it is likely to be fine; if the moderators feel you are trying to demonstrate unpalatable political allegiances, or to use it in an attempt to ridicule or provoke others you WILL be asked to change it. RO is NOT the place to make any extremist political statements of any kind.
Examples:
So people get the idea, some examples that would be considered offensive, numbered as above:
  1. "Hitler", "Beria"
  2. "NKVD Blocking Detachment", "Einsatzgruppen"
  3. This one should be pretty obvious...
  4. So should this - and it includes calling all Germans "Nazis" and all Soviets/Russians "Commies". It got boring 50 years ago, so stop it.
  5. Use of swastikas, fasces, SS-runes and so on for the Axis.
  6. There is actually very little overt symbolism from the Stalinist era; the hammer-and-sickle isn't offensive per se.
A simple rule-of-thumb: many Europeans find Nazi symbolism of any sort offensive; many Americans still find Soviet symbolism offensive. Engage your brain before using.




Final Note: this is NOT open to debate, so please do NOT start whining and moaning if a moderator asks you to change something. They will advise at first, giving reasons, then, if you take no notice, they will step up the pressure through to banning.
See more
See less

Attacking the Attacker

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Attacking the Attacker

    When in a campaign mode game I see this far too often. You are on the defense, you deploy in game with already less tickets than the enemy, and for some reason instead of 'digging in' and playing 'defense' the troops disregarding 'suggestions' from the commander get up and 'run' at the enemy, essentially 'attacking the attacker' and then wonder why they lost.


    Every map here can be defended if it actually is, even Apartments. People complain about Bridges but Apartments is far more unbalanced and no one cares for it 'meets' their need. Sit in the right and left doorways and defend the hallways and basement doorways, LMG's crossing the center alley gap from the flanks, and the enemy has to come to you. If you give them no way to enter the left and right buildings, or go through center how can you not win and defend Apartments for example. Sill do not understand why the fixed machinegun on the 2nd floor of left building is never manned, and a troop or two guarding the stairwell up to him, the MMG can hold the front better than any asset available to the defense, but is readily ignored. But every game the defender throws himself at the attackers and again wonder how they lost. Offense is not always the best defense.


    Setting up crossfires behind cover, not taking the enemy on 'nose on nose' and effective deployment of weapons systems and every map is defendable.


    Now reverse the scenario. If I am attacking there is the 'break' point where you can not win. In the campaign mode it is more advantageous to now go into a defensive posture and 'bleed out' the defenders as they will almost on cue 'attack the attacker'. Bleed them down to zero and preserve my troops, as the attacker even though I did not 'win' the map I won the combat power aspect of the game, and the enemy has to deal with lower numbers the next map played.


    In the campaign mode territories as well as combat power is how you 'win' the campaign, the individual battles are secondary. Your bleeding out the combat power of the enemy while preserving yours you will win the campaign.
    Last edited by oldsoldier173; 03-27-2014, 02:37 PM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post
    In the campaign mode territories as well as combat power is how you 'win' the campaign, the individual battles are secondary. Your bleeding out the combat power of the enemy while preserving yours you will win the campaign.
    On this sentence I disagree. Attrition is not victory.
    Combat power is for campaign what is reinforcement is for a round.
    Win the combat power is look like wining the reinforcement.
    You can lost with high reinforcement.

    Attrition of reinforcement or attrition of combat power is good.
    But victory is not given mainly by this practice.

    Attrition just help to win a team. But a team need to take victory first.
    A good commander will make attrition works for victory. But it's team who takes victory - helped or not by attrition of combat power and reinforcement of enemy troop.

    Attrition is not victory. Attrition can give victory, sometime, if attrition is well used by headquarter.


    example :

    -In game:
    in apparts you can have
    germans with no reinforcement against russians with a lot of reinforcement
    and german win because they kill all russians in the tactic sectors during last minutes of round

    -In campaign :
    "the campaign, the individual battles are secondary"
    No. Because when you lost your last sector of map you lost.
    Last edited by ro2player; 03-27-2014, 03:00 PM.
    [QUOTE=Duchstein;1277141]Festung Europe will end RO2 lol[/QUOTE] Go in He.l with your game. RO 2 will end Festung Europa.
    "My Way ? ...Stalingrad !"

    Comment


    • #3
      You missed the point, you can own less territories than the enemy but you get his combat power to below '0' you win regardless of how many territories you own.


      Attrition of the enemy reflects on his combat power the next round. The 75/25 attack/defend win as well as casualities inflicted on the enemy and how many of your troops are left alive all combine to provide the 'combat power' available for the next round of the campaign. Individual games this does not apply, only in campaign mode.


      There are times you are stalled as an attacker, with time available to 'waste', I order a sit back and defend, and the defender 'attacks', we bleed them out some, and then resume the advance, with the enemy now concerned that his tickets are far below ours, giving the attacker more options.


      You have to play this game like 'chess' rather than charge at each other and hope you are luckier than the enemy in what you do.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post
        You missed the point, you can own less territories than the enemy but you get his combat power to below '0' you win regardless of how many territories you own.
        Oldsoldier,
        You will surely recognize : Win by attrition does not come really often.
        Attrition is not a victory. Attrition help to bring victory in your side.

        Lost a sector has not "no importance". No. Each sector is important.

        Reinforcement are importants. Sectors are importants.
        You are more easily by defeat by loses of sector than loses of reinforcement. (even if it's possible it's right)

        Attrition is an instrument to make more easy the victory.
        Attrition has a impact more and more visible inside the round.

        Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post
        Individual games this does not apply, only in campaign mode.
        I am talking about combat power for a campaign and reinforcement for a round.
        Attrition work inside campaign look like attrition works inside a round.

        Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post

        Attrition of the enemy reflects on his combat power the next round. The 75/25 attack/defend win as well as casualities inflicted on the enemy and how many of your troops are left alive all combine to provide the 'combat power' available for the next round of the campaign. Individual games this does not apply, only in campaign mode.


        There are times you are stalled as an attacker, with time available to 'waste', I order a sit back and defend, and the defender 'attacks', we bleed them out some, and then resume the advance, with the enemy now concerned that his tickets are far below ours, giving the attacker more options.


        You have to play this game like 'chess' rather than charge at each other and hope you are luckier than the enemy in what you do.

        You can win a map by attrition of reinforcement sometime. Apparts, Commissars, Fallen

        Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post
        You have to play this game like 'chess' rather than charge at each other and hope you are luckier than the enemy in what you do.
        Commander should ban luck from his vocabulary I think...
        Last edited by ro2player; 03-27-2014, 03:22 PM.
        [QUOTE=Duchstein;1277141]Festung Europe will end RO2 lol[/QUOTE] Go in He.l with your game. RO 2 will end Festung Europa.
        "My Way ? ...Stalingrad !"

        Comment


        • #5
          Now sit back and look what you wrote. How do you 'win' except by attriting the enemy and inflicting more casualities on him than he does to you. The way the points system is set up, killing more of them than he does of you increases the points you are awarded in combat power for that round.


          You need to look at the Big picture in these games, not just the immediate round. If I continue to throw my troops in a unwinnable round, and end up with excessive casualities or total elimination of troops, how does that affect me next round or the round after.


          There are times I will let an enemy win a round and territory to preserve my combat power for later in the round. It is part of the 'chess' game, sacrifice a 'pawn' to take his rook.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post
            Now sit back and look what you wrote. How do you 'win' except by attriting the enemy and inflicting more casualities on him than he does to you. The way the points system is set up, killing more of them than he does of you increases the points you are awarded in combat power for that round.
            If you take all the maps of Stalingrad you win. Even with big loses.
            You win before attrition for you or your enemy come.

            More quickly you capture all the sector, more you will win without BIG ATTRITION in campaign. More you wait, bigger will be your attrition.

            Victory by attrition is a slow victory.

            Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post
            There are times I will let an enemy win a round and territory to preserve my combat power for later in the round. It is part of the 'chess' game, sacrifice a 'pawn' to take his rook.
            A territory ? but if attacking this territory will bring you heavy loses ??
            It's better in this case to defend.
            You will not suffer havy lose as the attack for this bloody sector will risk to cost to your army.
            Last edited by ro2player; 03-27-2014, 03:31 PM.
            [QUOTE=Duchstein;1277141]Festung Europe will end RO2 lol[/QUOTE] Go in He.l with your game. RO 2 will end Festung Europa.
            "My Way ? ...Stalingrad !"

            Comment


            • #7
              A good team will at times elect to defend rather than attack in order to conserve his combat power, and lower the opponents. It is not a case of territory, but how many casualities you can inflict on the attacker and minimalize yours.


              You can as stated win the game without taking all the territories, simply by reducing the enemies combat power to below '0' and it is not hard to do.
              Last edited by oldsoldier173; 03-27-2014, 03:33 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post
                You can as stated win the game without taking all the territories, simply by reducing the enemies combat power to below '0' and it is not hard to do.
                Not hard but slow. It make the game more slow. You meet more often death by capture than death by attrition in campaign.

                It's possible but not often realised. More often territory count more than combat power. (each territory should be see as number of combat power...)
                [QUOTE=Duchstein;1277141]Festung Europe will end RO2 lol[/QUOTE] Go in He.l with your game. RO 2 will end Festung Europa.
                "My Way ? ...Stalingrad !"

                Comment


                • #9
                  In my experience, it's usually best just to keep attacking until you've captured every territory. I've literally never ever seen a Combat Power campaign victory or loss, only conquest.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Jank View Post
                    In my experience, it's usually best just to keep attacking until you've captured every territory. I've literally never ever seen a Combat Power campaign victory or loss, only conquest.
                    Jank,

                    Idea of Oldsoldier works only if team is blocked with low combat power
                    Heavy loses pinned the team in defense.
                    Attrition works in the long run.

                    Wanted to win volontary the game in defense by attrition is possible but comes not often. Attrition doesn't mean victory necessary. Attrition help to take victory. it's an instrument.

                    A exceptional case :
                    We can see a good team pinned in defense by attrition inside the last sector of the campaign and who defeat attacking enemy team because they killed all its combat power ticket ! In the end defending team had more combat power tickets than enemy team and finished them by an victorious attack.

                    I really don't see it often.
                    Last edited by ro2player; 03-28-2014, 08:29 AM.
                    [QUOTE=Duchstein;1277141]Festung Europe will end RO2 lol[/QUOTE] Go in He.l with your game. RO 2 will end Festung Europa.
                    "My Way ? ...Stalingrad !"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      'We' bleed out the Germans of Combat power and won last nights 'campaign' on a 'pub' server last night with 3 territories still in German hands.


                      It can be done if done right, finally the 'troops' began to listen last night and 'defended' when it was time, and 'attack' when it was time. A lot of this depends on the people on the server. If they are playing for themselves, issues, if they play as a team pretty easy to do.


                      At 'Station' for example, 100& full server, formed a defensive perimeter along the 'A' line and the Germans never even 'capped' 'A' and lock-downed out with massive casualities we only had moderate loses. Troops stayed defensive, in cover, not moving and the Germans just walked into the fires, a fantastic job by the Russian troops.


                      As the Commander I played 'chess' on the radio, watched our blue dots, organized the defense, shifted forces as needed based on the red enemy counters, you know things real commanders do, kept troops informed, recon up and mortars firing, never fired my personal weapon and 'kill' count still in high 40's through mortar fire alone. SL's did their jobs and acted as my forward 'spawn' points, troops were spawning on SL's forward instead of long dashing from rear area spawns. The whole night on every map played a real pleasant Command 'exercise' and the troops learned something as I kept explaining what I was doing and why, and once they saw it worked, easy night.
                      Last edited by oldsoldier173; 03-28-2014, 08:37 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post
                        At 'Station' for example, 100& full server, formed a defensive perimeter along the 'A' line and the Germans never even 'capped' 'A' and lock-downed out with massive casualities we only had moderate loses. Troops stayed defensive, in cover, not moving and the Germans just walked into the fires, a fantastic job by the Russian troops.
                        Map Station is often more hard to attack than to defend.
                        On this forum I have heard, it's one most difficult map.

                        I think : each map is difficult. A part of problem is :
                        - quality of troop
                        - quality of commandship.

                        It's possible to win in Station. Victory is still possible. On each map.
                        [QUOTE=Duchstein;1277141]Festung Europe will end RO2 lol[/QUOTE] Go in He.l with your game. RO 2 will end Festung Europa.
                        "My Way ? ...Stalingrad !"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          We did the same with Apartments twice, defended and won, as we 'defended' by choice and the attacker picked the 'easy' map Apartments. Defend both the right and left building enterences, troops in C but back in the building defending the windows, troops defending basement doorways and LMG's to right and left flanks of center alley crossfiring from cover. We let them take A and B, and then the crossfires just decimated them, they never got to cap 'C' either time.


                          We 'won' Bridges by taking J and K and then let them 'attack' us to take them back which they could not but for some reason kept trying and again inflicted massive casualities on them, then resumed advance. Won with over 10min left, they has '0' tickets left, we had over 200. (and no smoke thrown till we got to second bridge and final assault)


                          The game is akin to 'chess' as I explained before, sometimes you sacrifice a 'pawn' to get the enemy to go for something you 'show' him, and then he walks his 'rook' into an ambush he never saw coming.


                          Now think troops, are you the 'attack the attacker' type as well, until you meet a true defense you think it actually works.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by oldsoldier173 View Post
                            We did the same with Apartments twice, defended and won, as we 'defended' by choice and the attacker picked the 'easy' map Apartments. Defend both the right and left building enterences, troops in C but back in the building defending the windows, troops defending basement doorways and LMG's to right and left flanks of center alley crossfiring from cover. We let them take A and B, and then the crossfires just decimated them, they never got to cap 'C' either time.


                            We 'won' Bridges by taking J and K and then let them 'attack' us to take them back which they could not but for some reason kept trying and again inflicted massive casualities on them, then resumed advance. Won with over 10min left, they has '0' tickets left, we had over 200. (and no smoke thrown till we got to second bridge and final assault)


                            The game is akin to 'chess' as I explained before, sometimes you sacrifice a 'pawn' to get the enemy to go for something you 'show' him, and then he walks his 'rook' into an ambush he never saw coming.


                            Now think troops, are you the 'attack the attacker' type as well, until you meet a true defense you think it actually works.
                            Oldsoldier,
                            If enemy commander play in attrition way : fight for quick victory.
                            If enemy commander play for quick victory : fight for attrition victory.

                            It's dilemma of use of combat power inside campaign and use of reinforcement inside round. HOW you will use it ? (also mixed with territory and sector of campaign map) Few sectors are more easy to capture than antohers...

                            It's look like battle between Alcyoneus and Hercules. Alcyoneus was invincible when he was on ground. Fight your enemy in the ground where he is weak ...look like Hercules fought Alcyoneus not on his own ground !

                            Use nature of the enemy commandship against himself !
                            ...and not only in attrition scale.
                            Last edited by ro2player; 03-28-2014, 11:58 AM.
                            [QUOTE=Duchstein;1277141]Festung Europe will end RO2 lol[/QUOTE] Go in He.l with your game. RO 2 will end Festung Europa.
                            "My Way ? ...Stalingrad !"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The tactic goal in RO 2 is not necessary the destruction of the enemy army but the defeat of the enemy army and enemy commandship.
                              Last edited by ro2player; 03-29-2014, 12:05 PM.
                              [QUOTE=Duchstein;1277141]Festung Europe will end RO2 lol[/QUOTE] Go in He.l with your game. RO 2 will end Festung Europa.
                              "My Way ? ...Stalingrad !"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X