Not so, the uber-engie does have a greater foundation in plausibility than the RO2 equiv.: Nomad's (insta-repair in his mind, apparently) mobile repair crews. The TF2 Engie is an entity that is mobile, has to reach the asset and can be killed whilst attempting to repair said asset; whereas the nanite potato delivery vessels are fixed, indestructible, everlasting, are located in silly places and cannot be stolen (so you can make a dash for that nanite potato stack that's currently within enemy terrirory and it will dutifully fix you up just as readily as it will still fix up enemy tanks). Make no mistake, both approaches are ***-backward and worthy of raspberries but the BF silliness-approach is more authentic than the RO2 silliness-approach. Of course, one of these two game is meant to be silly, the other isn't.The idea that an M1's longevity is massively increased by someone following it around with a power wrench is just patently ridiculous and has no possible analogue in reality.
Pulling back to a safe location for AFV field repair should only mean one thing in RO2: the initial spawn point. (That
Upvote
0