Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules

CHANGES
  • Items changed, or highlighted for future attention, on 20 July 2013 are highlighted in yellow.
Global Rules
  • Forum moderators may or may not be Tripwire Interactive staff members, but either way, please respect them, as they are the authority of the forums. Speaking to them with intentional spite will not be tolerated and may result in the loss of your forum privileges.
  • Any decisions made by any member of staff or moderator are final and not subject to discussion. Doing so may result in a ban from the site. The owners of Tripwire Interactive Forums reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason, as well as to remove access to the forums for any individuals with or without warning for breaches of the rules.
  • If you have a complaint regarding another user, PM the appropriate moderators, or if you have an administrative issue, [RO]schneidzekk.
General Behaviour
  • Use the search function before posting. Chances are your question has already been answered.
  • Use a title that describes the content of your post. Don't use all caps or special characters to draw attention either in the title or the body of the post.
  • Up to 10 emoticons are allowed in a post
  • Political discussions are prohibited.
  • Flaming - We do not tolerate abusive, malicious, personal attacks. You will be banned if you persist in this behavior.
  • Trolls - Anyone deliberately antagonizing other forum users by posting 'flame bait' type messages is not welcome. You will be banned (possibly without warning depending on the severity of the issue) if you persist in this behavior.
  • Personal insults (directed at anyone) will result in a ban. If the behavior is not corrected, it will be made more permanent.
  • Constructive criticism is welcome. However keep in mind we (and other forums goers) may not agree with you. If you can't keep the conversation civil, you will be removed from the forums.
  • The use of hyperbole, one liners, and images as part of a forum debate is likely to get you infracted. You have many ways to participate and be a constructive part of this community, even when you disagree.
  • To make the highlighted bits above 100% clear to everyone, the following WILL NOT BE TOLERATED:
    1. Personal attacks, insults, antagonism of any forum-goers, moderators or Tripwire Interactive staff.
    2. Breaches of confidentiality and privacy of any sort.
    3. Any form of racism, bigotry or attacks on race, creed or color.
    4. Linking to posts on other forums related to ANY of the above, whether you are the originator or not, without exception.
  • There has been too much in the way of abhorrent personal behaviors in the past. These will cease. It doesn't matter who started it or who reacted to it - it will all result in moderator action. If you have to indulge your hatreds, for whatever reason, go do it elsewhere - and do not try and drag our forum-goers over to enjoy your hatreds.
  • We understand that people have strong feelings about our games, what we do for a living and how we respond (or don't) to comments on the forums. We all aren't going to agree about everything. So, BE CIVIL in your disagreements!
DO NOTs
  • DO NOT Transmit any message, information, data, text, software or graphic files, or other materials ("Content") that is unlawful (including illegal drug usage), harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful or racially, ethnically, sexually or otherwise objectionable. This includes publicizing private information, such as individual's real names, IP addresses and anything else that might be used to identify them to the freakier members of the internet. This also means you may NOT publically share private communications (PM, email or anything else) without the original poster's permission.
  • DO NOT Post or transmit any Content that contains a virus, Trojan horse or other mischievous Content.
  • DO NOT Post or transmit any unsolicited advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail", "spam", "chain letters", "pyramid schemes" or any other form of solicitation.
  • DO NOT link to posts on any other forums, or any other form of media, that breaches our rules. It will be treated just the same as if you had posted it here.
  • DO NOT Double Post, cross Post or restart closed threads.
  • DO NOT Intentionally or unintentionally violate any applicable local, state, national or international law, rule or regulation.
  • DO NOT Upload or transmit any Content that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights ("Rights") of any party.
  • DO NOT post cheats or exploits; THIS INCLUDES ALL/ANY REFERENCES TO HACKING, PIRATED SOFTWARE etc.
  • DO NOT complain about being banned from a server and DO NOT complain about other players on servers - that is between you and the admin, no need to get the community involved.
Username, Avatar and Signature Rules
  • Multiple registrations result in a ban.
  • No offensive user names
  • Avatars:
    Avatars are disabled.
  • All signatures should not exceed the following size limits, you can have both text and images
  • - For text signatures: 4 lines normal size, 8 lines small size and up to 100 chars per line. Font sizes above 2 are not allowed. (Blank lines count as lines.)
  • - For images in signatures: 1 image up to 400 pixels wide, 150 pixels tall and 100kb in size plus 2 lines normal size text and up to 100 chars per line
Netiquette: Written text has no inflection, and, as such, you should be careful how you write your messages as interpretation will vary from person to person. Please take advantage of the built-in emoticons to add such expression to your words. Please remember the golden rule: to treat other forum users the way you would like to be treated. Please use common courtesy, and enjoy using Red Orchestra's forums
Offensive material
The following is a list of some things that MAY be considered "offensive" by the moderators and the team. This is NOT an exclusive list and it does depend very much on context.

Crossing the line into "offensive" territory is likely to get you asked to change your name, sig or avatar or to withdraw/delete posts. This will be done politely by the moderators. If you refuse to comply further action WILL be taken once started, ultimately leading to banning from the forums.

A key point: please attempt to use your brains. What is mild humour to you may well be deeply offensive to others. While we have no intention of acting as politically-correct "thought police", we are on the lookout for those things that can cause offense and, in some cases, are actually still illegal in some jurisdictions.
  1. Names recalling notorious war criminals or personalities.
  2. Names recalling atrocities and war crimes in general, or units with particularly odious histories.
  3. Use of obscenities and expletives.
  4. Blatant racism, mysogynism or many other "ism"s.
  5. Use of symbolism and regalia recalling Nazism or Fascism; this does not include pics of soldiers who happen to have such symbols on their uniform, unless we feel this has been done to provoke. Please note that many Nazi symbols (including the Swastika) are still illegal in Germany and other countries and considered deeply offensive by many Europeans.
  6. Use of symbolism and regalia recalling Stalinism.
  7. On both the previous two, the moderators' views on the intention and impact of use of such symbols will be final - not yours. Please be understanding if you are advised to change something.
  8. In general, if a sig/avatar represents your allegiances in-game and is clearly "in part", it is likely to be fine; if the moderators feel you are trying to demonstrate unpalatable political allegiances, or to use it in an attempt to ridicule or provoke others you WILL be asked to change it. RO is NOT the place to make any extremist political statements of any kind.
Examples:
So people get the idea, some examples that would be considered offensive, numbered as above:
  1. "Hitler", "Beria"
  2. "NKVD Blocking Detachment", "Einsatzgruppen"
  3. This one should be pretty obvious...
  4. So should this - and it includes calling all Germans "Nazis" and all Soviets/Russians "Commies". It got boring 50 years ago, so stop it.
  5. Use of swastikas, fasces, SS-runes and so on for the Axis.
  6. There is actually very little overt symbolism from the Stalinist era; the hammer-and-sickle isn't offensive per se.
A simple rule-of-thumb: many Europeans find Nazi symbolism of any sort offensive; many Americans still find Soviet symbolism offensive. Engage your brain before using.




Final Note: this is NOT open to debate, so please do NOT start whining and moaning if a moderator asks you to change something. They will advise at first, giving reasons, then, if you take no notice, they will step up the pressure through to banning.
See more
See less

Something that worries me slightly.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Something that worries me slightly.

    I've decided to start playing Ostfront and DH again, for nostalgic reasons and because I enjoyed both games immensely. I can't say either of them are dead, because there is atleast one full server full of regulars.

    One thing I noticed is the sheer volume of die-hard RO1 and DH players who are blissfully unaware of the progress RO2 has made since its launch. Very many of them don't even know the classic mode is being made let alone being tested. It saddens me because the Classic mode truely has the potential to bring back some of the players that RO2 lost.
    [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/2GlNelD.png[/IMG]

  • #2
    I don't think that's all that worrisome. While RO2 is in a state where it could use all the (good) players it could get, 1 or 2 full 50 (or less) man servers in RO1 or DH I don't think is indicative of anything in particular; especially if those people are blissfully unaware of what is going on in RO2 (that means they apparently never cared enough to check in on progress or knew enough about TWI to even know there would be progress). Besides, it's a reality of PC gaming that previous games get played even after the new game is out. That's pretty normal. It doesn't even mean all those people actually tried or ever will try RO2. I myself have done this. Buy a game when it is dirt cheap after the sequel has come out, but never go to the sequel. It'd be great if those people can and do join or rejoin RO2 community, but if they don't, they don't.

    Comment


    • #3
      Just mention the RO2 progress etc in the public chat when you are playing RO1 or DH, without getting pushy. My 2 cents
      ASUS M5A99X EVO R2.0, ASUS GTX650TI-OC-2GB,AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition FX-6300,8 GB Corsair RAM,Win 7 64,SATA drive

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by oldslowguy
        Just mention the RO2 progress etc in the public chat when you are playing RO1 or DH, without getting pushy. My 2 cents
        So does this mean RO II player counts are so low one has to go back to the old RO I in an attempt to leach players from them? Or in other words, when one is playing in-game (DH) and concentrating on playing, one (especially admins) does not like useless, distracting spam on voice/chat about unrelated RO II stuff.



        .
        Last edited by Field Marshal Rommel; 04-07-2012, 01:50 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          A lot of the people still in DH or RO:Ostfront (though certainly not everyone) are limited by hardware, and literally haven't even bought RO2 or tried it yet because they can't run it. I know several players at least for which that is the case.
          sigpic
          Classic forever.

          Comment


          • #6
            Not concerned. Once the game is polished, press releases will be sent out and Tripwire will roll with their standard dog and pony show. If the game is good, the players will come.

            New players.

            I doubt TWI would be investing time and treasure at this point without a plan to generate new revenue. Patience.

            Comment


            • #7
              did you realise how bad RO1 and DH actualy are when playing them again, i played Dh not long ago and cudnt believe how much effort it ook to get over walls and generaly take cover while getting shot at

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Dr.Phibles View Post
                did you realise how bad RO1 and DH actualy are when playing them again, i played Dh not long ago and cudnt believe how much effort it ook to get over walls and generaly take cover while getting shot at
                Yeah, I was less impressed with DH than I was with RO1.... DH has a lot of content, but spawn bunkers don't help things, and many elements / models / animations in DH really bugged me.

                The last time I tried to play DH for any length of time, I found my favorite weapon (Sten MK II) had sights that blocked most of your view of the target and the muzzle flash basically made you lose any tracking of your target.... and the Thompson wasn't much better...... and the fact that the majority of the servers I could find basically focused on nothing but US vs. German, I lost interest quickly, as I've played way too many FPS's that revolved around the US, and US weapons (Medal of Honor, Call of Duty, Day of Defeat, etc.) Yes there are Canadian/British forces in DH, but again, trying to find a decent server that offered those forces was hard to find.

                The model for the Sten MKII bugged the hell out of me too.... I've handled a Sten MKII a few times as my father had one in his WWII Collection, and comparing the DH Sten to the Sten I held in my hands, the DH Sten looked like a thin metal pipe, 3/4 the actual size it should have been..... and as mentioned before, the sights on the DH Sten were horribly done.

                Heck back in the mod days of RO, I decided to model my own Sten MKII (and MKV):



                And while I could have pumped up the polys and add more detail to my model when I had more time, it's still a lot closer to the real thing than the DH Sten:



                Just the perspective of most of the DH weapons were just.... bad..... many of them were really thin, yet really long. The friggin ammo clip shown above was almost as long as the weapon. So many people hammer on how much realism was in DH..... but they couldn't even get the weapons looking right, not to mention the excessive muzzle flashes.
                Last edited by Cpt-Praxius; 04-09-2012, 11:37 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Thats an impressive looking Sten there man. Did you draw the textures yourself or did you use a photo as a base, because I could never get those right. To be honest though, I have little experience with 3D modeling for this kind of thing. Ironic as I use AutoCAD and SolidWorks all the time if you're familiar with them. Even more unlikely, I have a half-finished Sten MkII model myself that I did in SolidWorks as part of my design portfolio, I got through the exterior and the clip, but never finished the trigger mechanism or the bolt, that thing is a beastly work of machining, ill post it up though if i find the files.
                  [COLOR=White]"But it turns out realistic doesn't always equal fun, for example the game features No Crosshair! TEH NOES!!!!1!!!one!!" -XPlay Review.[/COLOR]
                  [COLOR=Red][/COLOR]

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by [Mad_Murdock] View Post
                    Thats an impressive looking Sten there man. Did you draw the textures yourself or did you use a photo as a base, because I could never get those right.
                    I created the textures from scratch in Photoshop based on various photos and my memory of my father's Sten MKII.

                    The model isn't really par with today's in-game models, as it was designed for UT2004/RO:CA era modeling, thus I cut some corners such as the details on the side of the Sten being just textured on (not modeled) in order to keep below the 5000 poly count that was the average back then.

                    I find trying to modify photos is more trouble than it's worth compared to doing it from scratch, as lighting & angles can screw the look of the model when brought into the actual game, which uses in-game lighting & shading to do all that.... having shading in the texture can mess up the overall look.

                    To be honest though, I have little experience with 3D modeling for this kind of thing. Ironic as I use AutoCAD and SolidWorks all the time if you're familiar with them.
                    I used AutoCAD before, but over a decade ago when I was in a Mechanical Drafting course (AutoCAD 2000).... since then I hardly touched AutoCAD and pretty well forget how to use it now, lol. I've seen SolidWorks and I think I used it a couple of times, but my knowledge in that program is even less.

                    My experience in 3D Modeling/Animation is mostly in Maya and 3DS Max. (Mostly Maya though)

                    Even more unlikely, I have a half-finished Sten MkII model myself that I did in SolidWorks as part of my design portfolio, I got through the exterior and the clip, but never finished the trigger mechanism or the bolt, that thing is a beastly work of machining, ill post it up though if i find the files.
                    Cool.... it'd be interesting to see, but I never bothered with all the mechanics of the trigger or bolt system, as you'd never see that stuff in-game anyways
                    Last edited by Cpt-Praxius; 04-10-2012, 01:26 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Giuliano View Post
                      Very many of them don't even know the classic mode is being made let alone being tested.
                      As one of those oldschool people, I think many of us do know but it still isn't good enough. The main problem I've heard is the maps. In original RO and DH, modders made large scale combined arms maps that really gave you a feeling of being in a huge conflict. The current maps are a fraction of what we love, and it just feels cramped and too fast paced. The realism is great, but the pacing is just way off and reminds me more of mainstream games than RO. The old maps also had a feeling of a frontline. I don't know how to really explain it, but there were always certain areas that both teams would come to a standstill in and it would be the most intense fighting. Breaking through the enemies frontline was the greatest feeling. Maybe I just haven't played enough, but in RO2 it doesn't feel like there is much of a frontline. I'll be with some teammates in a shootout with the enemies, when somebody runs up and shoots me in the back. It just felt more like some kind of halo style deathmatch, where you cruise around the map and try to shoot up single enemies.

                      Once the devs release the new tanks and transports, if add some big maps then you'll see people coming back. I preordered the game, played it for a while, then gave up on it. I still check back to see the progress, but it still doesn't do it for me enough to play routinely.
                      Last edited by Sonicpanda; 04-10-2012, 10:43 PM. Reason: wording

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I still play RO1 on a regular basis and it's a ton of fun, but I play RO2 too. I can enjoy both and even darkest hour, it's not because there is still players on ro1 than they are not playing RO2 too. Both games are greats, no one is more realistic than the other, they are different so I see nothing to be worried about.


                        Originally posted by Dr.Phibles View Post
                        did you realise how bad RO1 and DH actualy are when playing them again, i played Dh not long ago and cudnt believe how much effort it ook to get over walls and generaly take cover while getting shot at
                        I find RO1 and DH still enjoyable, and taking cover is easier since you will not face the "can't prone here" message
                        Last edited by jackrabbitslim7; 04-11-2012, 08:00 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I predict (again), that the classic mode (no matter how much I welcome it) will split the community again.

                          Some will stay with realism, others classic. I for one, won't have both games on my system.

                          A great example of how it will break the community. The most popular server is taking votes on what mode to play. I fear that the only server that can stay consistently full will now have its population halved.
                          monster

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by >< f4ct0r...13 View Post
                            Some will stay with realism, others classic.
                            But then there are people like me who will either play classic or nothing. And the main reason there aren't players is because of the big flop on release, with all the bugs and problems. I remember on release day there were thousands of players, now it seems like it doesn't break 100.
                            Last edited by Sonicpanda; 04-11-2012, 10:28 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Sonicpanda View Post
                              But then there are people like me who will either play classic or nothing. And the main reason there aren't players is because of the big flop on release, with all the bugs and problems. I remember on release day there were thousands of players, now it seems like it doesn't break 100.
                              And while you'll only play Classic, I'll only play the two existing game modes..... and when the existing servers decide to pick one or the other, everybody's options of servers running what they want will be reduced even further, which will most likely create a number of new problems.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X