• Please make sure you are familiar with the forum rules. You can find them here: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/index.php?threads/forum-rules.2334636/

PAX Interview (sorry, gonna have to read :P)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
#101
Stormer said:
the game should punish the people who don't want to cooperate, not reward them
Click to expand...

You can always ask the Commander to unlock his Tank in Chat, but its way better with lockable Tanks as having one in there who doesn't cooperate. And this gets prevented with lockable Tanks.

This prevents (sorry for rude language) random idiots, to spoil someones Game. More often that not people who friendly ask something will be capable of Teamplay, so lock first, unlock for nice Teamplayers.
 
Upvote 0
#102
Stormer said:
the game should punish the people who don't want to cooperate, not reward them
Click to expand...

A game shouldn't "punish" anyone, specially someone who doesn't want some random idiot to ruin the fun, which is far too common. And last time I checked, games were supposed to be rewarding and fun experiences.

but, according to you, the game should give you 3 options:

1 - being an *** at the spawn until (if) you get rid of the griefer .

2 - get griefed

3 - get punished by the game


I'm so glad you don't work at TWI
 
Upvote 0
#104
Stormer said:
the game should punish the people who don't want to cooperate, not reward them
Click to expand...

No offense, but in a public game the chance of team tanking is very, very low. Like, near zero. RO:Ost proved this. Now that you can lock the tank, it gives you three advantages:


  1. You won't end up with a noob in your tank (and most people are tank noobs)
  2. You won't get grieved as much (for some reason tanks attract a LOT of grievers, TK'ers, idiots etc)
  3. You can choose who enters your tank, e.g. a buddy who DOES know what he's doing.
All those advantages, and more, result in a much more enjoyable experience for everybody. If anything, you get MORE teamwork with the new system, not less.
 
Upvote 0
#105
Nimsky said:
No offense, but in a public game the chance of team tanking is very, very low. Like, near zero. RO:Ost proved this. Now that you can lock the tank, it gives you three advantages:


  1. You won't end up with a noob in your tank (and most people are tank noobs)
  2. You won't get grieved as much (for some reason tanks attract a LOT of grievers, TK'ers, idiots etc)
  3. You can choose who enters your tank, e.g. a buddy who DOES know what he's doing.
All those advantages, and more, result in a much more enjoyable experience for everybody. If anything, you get MORE teamwork with the new system, not less.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
It would be great if they would allow to chose whether your tank is closed or opened by default. And depending on that, you could either open it for specific people, or close it for specific people.
That could be useful for players that have no problems team-tanking on public servers and like to have their tanks opened, though they'd want to be able to easily add idiots to "black list" so they'd never have to deal with them again, still having the tanks opened for the rest.
 
Upvote 0
#109
Nimsky said:
Yep, Spartanovka looks non-urban.
Click to expand...

yes and it also looks like it could be big/open enough for combined arms.

also:

Tanks Only? - yes, one of the 10 stock maps currently in development will be focused completely on amour…..so tanks only, and this time there’s enough tanks to go around!
Click to expand...

i'm pretty certain this map won't be in an urban setting.....seeing as there could possibly be 64 tanks in it :eek::)
 
Upvote 0
#117
Galslacht said:
Please, for god sake, no, no Kaukasus or Baksan Valley. Those maps are the worst of ROOST. Nadespam galore and badly balanced (except for Baksan).
Click to expand...
Ugh totally agreed. I hated both Baksan Valley and Cock-o-saurus more than any other maps in the retail game AND the mod. Honestly, I can't see why people loved Kauk (har har) so much either ... it never had any gameplay flow and basically amounted to one team camping from spawn the entire game.
 
Upvote 0
#118
hockeywarrior said:
Ugh totally agreed. I hated both Baksan Valley and Cock-o-saurus more than any other maps in the retail game AND the mod. Honestly, I can't see why people loved Kauk (har har) so much either ... it never had any gameplay flow and basically amounted to one team camping from spawn the entire game.
Click to expand...



I like camping. Tents, campfires, marshmallows ... good times.



But, yeah, Kaukauses was only fun on the Soviet side.
 
Upvote 0
#119
Lucan946 said:
Kaukaus was an awesome map, I think. Baksan was very forgettable, although I'm not sure I'd call it bad. I dislike it in the way that I dislike Odessa, but I don't think Odessa is bad.
Click to expand...

:eek:
:confused:

Odessa was one of the BEST maps in RO:OST!

It had great balance, variety (closed up areas, long shooting ranges), and non linear paths (loved going round the long way to sneak up on some Axis).
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back
Jump to latest Follow Reply
Jump to latest Follow Reply
Community News
Forums
Merch
Menu